by Blender Dumbass Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
Spoilers for Magnolia 1999
15 Minute Read
Magnolia - a large flowering plant species in the subfamily Magnolioideae of the family Magnoliaceae.↩ Reply I have a fear about my current movie project that is not entirely unfounded. If everything works out as it should and I get to the point of pre-production, I might need to hire a good lawyer. The script has major roles for children, but due to the child-labor laws, the money for such roles is paid to the parents and not the children themselves. I want to come up with a way to make it so the kids are the ones that control the money. Otherwise I fear, the parents will steal it from them. Kind of like what we see in the 1999 film Magnolia by Paul Thomas Anderson.
↩ Reply Magnolia is a complicated, layered experience. We follow different story-lines all converging on a single thematic point. And it seems like the movie must be about respecting the children.
↩ Reply We have the wunderkind child character played by Jeremy Blackman who is pretty much forced onto a TV show by his father, played by Michael Bowen ( who you may know from Kill Bill as Buck who likes to Fuck ). In this movie his character is also a villain of sorts. He is pretty much abusing his son, forcing him to participate in a TV show, because of the money that he is going to make. And while the movie has enough moments to make it absolutely undeniable that the father character is a piece of shit ( even thought he isn't quite as fucked up as Buck ), the movie makes its point even clearer, by showing us a man that once used to be a wunderkind on that very show.
↩ Reply This man, played by William H. Macy, is a pathetic sort of guy with a lot of childhood trauma specifically because of the painful experience of seeing his parents take his money from him ( due to those same child-labor laws ).
↩ Reply On the other side of the spectrum, we have the TV show host himself, played by Philip Baker Hall, with whom Paul Thomas Anderson pulls off a sort of near Epstein-files kind of revelation about Hollywood. He, allegedly, molested his daughter, played by Melora Walters, who is utterly fucked up because of it. Also the TV show's wife is played by Melinda Dillon who you may know from Spielberg's Close Encounters of the Third Kind, but that's besides the point...
↩ Reply This daughter character meets a police officer played by John C. Reilly who breaks the rules and asks her for a date. Earlier, though, this officer runs into a little boy, played by Emmanuel Johnson, who is an aspiring rapper. He performs in front of the police officer, claiming that he just revealed to him all of the details about a murder case. But the officer ( and by extend, the audience of the film ) did not hear the words of the child. Child doing a rap performance is merely amusing to the police officer. Meaning nobody takes him seriously.
↩ Reply Just for the context of this review, and to break the mold, to actually respect the damn kid, let's attempt to listen to what he has to say. Here are the lyrics of his little performance ( taken from the text of the screenplay ):
↩ Reply Presence - with a double ass meaning↩ Reply gifts I bestow, with my riff, and my flow↩ Reply but you don't hear me though↩ Reply think fast, catch me, yo↩ Reply cause I throw what I know with a↩ Reply Resonance - fo'yo'trouble-ass fiend in↩ Reply weenin yo-self off the back of the shelf↩ Reply Jackass crackas, bodystackas↩ Reply dicktootin niggas, masturbatin' yo trigga↩ Reply butcha y'all just fake-ass niggas↩ Reply livin' to get older↩ Reply with a chip on your shoulder↩ Reply 'cept you think you got a grip,↩ Reply cauze you hip gotta holster?↩ Reply Ain't no confessor, so busta, you best just↩ Reply Shut The fuck up, try to listen and learn↩ Reply Check that ego - come off it -↩ Reply I'm the profit - the proffesor↩ Reply Ima teach you 'bout The Worm,↩ Reply who eventually turned to catch wreck↩ Reply with the neck of a long time oppressor↩ Reply And he's runnin from the devil, but the↩ Reply debt is always gaining↩ Reply And if he's worth being hurt, he's worth↩ Reply bringin' pain in -↩ Reply When the sunshine don't work, the Good Lord↩ Reply bring the rain in.↩ Reply Let's rewind a bit to get a little bit of a context to this whole ordeal. Our officer is called for a disturbance. Somebody were yelling in their house. He came to check. He finds a lady that is immediately screaming at him about her rights. Suspicious of her he goes into the house to inspect it further and finds a body of a man in her closet.
↩ Reply After, as the movie progresses and this woman is asked by investigators, Paul Thomas Anderson's script and directing makes a very good attempt to force the audience to pay attention to one point of the investigation. A person nicknamed "The Worm".
↩ Reply As you can see, "The Worm" appears in the kid's rap lyrics: Ima teach you 'bout The Worm. What does that mean? is The Worm the killer? Who is said Worm? Well, let's dig a little deeper.
↩ Reply The first paragraph, titled "Presence" seems to be about the premise of the scene itself. The kid already knows that the police officer is not actually listening: gifts I bestow, with my riff, and my flow, but you don't hear me though. But because it has a double ass meaning, in my opinion it is also an attempt from the kid, to actually try to make the police officer to listen: think fast, catch me, yo, cause I throw what I know.
↩ Reply The second paragraph, Resonance, appears to be addressed at the police themselves. It is a dump of feelings of the kids about the police. They are a bunch of: fake-ass niggas livin' to get older with a chip on your shoulder. Except you think you got a grip, cauze you hip gotta holster? The chip on your shoulder probably means the badge, and then hip gotta holster means that the cop has a gun. ( Poetic, because this cop ends up losing said gun later ).
↩ Reply The kid then asks the cop to pay more attention: Shut The fuck up, try to listen and learn. And then he proceeds to tell an interesting story, which is thematically relevant to this movie as a whole: Ima teach you 'bout The Worm, there is somebody who's nickname is "The Worm" ( the same Worm that the investigators are trying to find ), who eventually turned to catch wreck with the neck of a long time oppressor. Hm... Who tried to catch wreck? Who tried to help someone who was about to wreck? Who tried to help someone to deal with the long time oppressor? That could be it.
↩ Reply Perhaps the woman was struggling with domestic abuse that got to such a troublesome extent that she had to do something rather drastic about it. There comes a vigilante "The Worm". A guy who kills said abuser, to free the woman from the abuse. As the kid says in the end of it: When the sunshine don't work, the Good Lord bring the rain in. Or in other words: sometimes you gotta punish the motherfucker.
↩ Reply Rain, though, is also quite interesting thematically. Because right after that, the film has a biblical kind of rain. The rain is so utterly insane that the mere presence of it in the scenes builds tension on its own. Yet, as somebody who saw the film would know, that is not the only biblical reference in the movie that has something to do with the word "Rain".
↩ Reply At one point the movie starts to go completely off rails. We start to see billboards and other advertising signs in the background of the film saying "Exodus 8:2". As you probably know that is a reference to the Torah ( aka the Bible ). Or more specifically to the part in the story of Moses ( that was trying to free Jews from the Egyptians ) where God punishes the Egyptians by sending upon them a huge hoard of frogs.
↩ Reply And then it starts raining frogs, in the film.
↩ Reply That is this very strong, very intense reference to the story of the Exodus. But what is Exodus really about? Well, as I have analyzed in my very old article on the matter, it is about freedom. But not just about freedom itself. It is about the cost of achieving it.
↩ Reply In a nutshell: the Jews were slaves to the Pharaoh, but they wanted to get free. Moses, using his connections, tried to help them become free. When this didn't work, God himself helped, by fucking up the Egyptians in a lot of very fuck up ways. Until the Pharaoh gave up and let them go.
↩ Reply But that is not it. There is the second part. The 40 year long journey it took to walk between Egypt and Israel. Do you know that modern Israel has a boarder with modern Egypt? And walking even from, say, the pyramids, to Jerusalem, by foot, should not take longer than maybe 2 weeks. Yet they wondered for 40 years. Why? Well... They were fucked up.
↩ Reply Jews were so used to the slave mindset that they couldn't figure out how to live on their own. But their kids. Well they were born free. They could figure it out. This is a story about childhood trauma.
↩ Reply So this rapper kid later finds a woman, played by Julianne Moore ( who you may know from Spielberg's second Jurassic Park film, or a thematically relevant film with Natalie Portman from 2023 called May December, or a yet another thematically relevant remake of Carrie from 2013 ), who is overdosed on medication, probably in an attempt to end her own life. She is very fucked up herself.
↩ Reply She is a young wife of a old dying man, who we learn pretty much immediately is a sort of a son-of-a-bitch. He is being cared by a nusre-guy played by Philip Seymour Hoffman, who he asks to find his son, played by Thomas Mapother the 4th, also knows as Tom Cruise ( who you may know from at least 2 Spielberg films, but that's besides the point ).
↩ Reply Critics often say that this role of Tom Cruise is the best role he ever did, mainly because the character he is playing is not too dissimilar from Tom himself. Same energy. Same awkward oversexualism. Same sort of charisma. But also same sort of underlying, kind of, patheticness somewhere deep in the core. His character in this film is selling men a rule-book to how to get women. He is monetizing misogyny by promising incels that they will get a pussy. One of the first lines he says in the film is "Respect the Cock".
↩ Reply That then leads to a very awkward interview with a female interviewer, played by April Grace ( who was in Spielberg's AI: Artificial Intelligence ), which reveals a lot about the trauma of this character. Basically his dying father's son-of-a-bitch-ness, fucked him up enough that he developed this misogynystic incelhood. And so now the father wants to apologize.
↩ Reply Funny that he ends up giving the interview to a person, played by an actor, who was in Spielberg's AI, actually. AI was originally Stanley Kubrick's project, but since he died ( in 1999, the year Magnolia came out ) Spielberg was assigned to finished the job ( by Kubrick's widowed wife ). But here is the thing: Spielberg also was helping finish the nearly finished, at the time last film by Stanley Kubrick Eyes Wide Shut, which also came out in 1999 and which coincidentally is also starring Tom Cruise.
↩ Reply But prepare your brains to be blown. Both Eyes Wide Shut and Magnolia are kind of about similar things. Both do the sort of near Epstein-files kind of revelation that I talked about in the beginning of this review. And both are extremely psycho-sexually analyze-able.
↩ Reply So we learn that you have to respect kids. And we see multiple examples of what happens when you don't. So is that it? Is that the whole premise of the film? How about there is another layer to it. A layer that would be explained only in 2021 when Paul Thomas Anderson released his almost recent film Licorice Pizza ( that have roles for two of Spielberg's daughters ).
↩ Reply How can the same film-maker have a problem with the TV host character for, allegedly, molesting his daughter, but then make a movie where Philip Seymour Hoffman ( who played the nurse ) 's son Cooper Hoffman plays a 15 year old boy in love with a grown woman, and where the movie is not seeing it as anything remotely problematic?
↩ Reply The frogs. I think the frogs give us the answer. When Tom Cruise comes to the father to see him dying, he is not there to be crying. He is pissed at his son-of-a-bitch father for his son-of-a-bitch-ness. But then he actually does forgive him. The woman, his young wife, originally married him, so she could inherit the money, when he dies. But she can't anymore. She knows he was a son-of-a-bitch, but she doesn't care about it anymore. She loves him now. She forgave him.
c:1c:2↩ Reply The first frog falls, when the police officer is about to arrest a man who is trying to break into the place he works. This is our, now adult, guy, who once was on the TV show. He just stole money from his boss, played by Alfred Molina ( who you may know from Spielberg's Indiana Jones, or later from Sam Raimi's Spiderman 2 ), but now he wants to return the money. The police office spots him, thinking that he is a burglar. He doesn't forgive him. He doesn't let him go. And the frog falls on his car.
↩ Reply Exodus 8:2↩ Reply
If you refuse to let them go, I will send a plague of frogs
↩ Reply "What can you forgive?", repeats the police officer in the end of the film, "What can you forgive?". A stellar example of the corruption of the audience.
↩ Reply Happy Hacking!!!↩ Reply
Bad Boys 2 is Michael Bay's most Bayhem! film. Man of fire is a huge leap in Tony Scott's directorial career. It is depressive, slow, simple, yet affective. It is both flashy and gruesomely slow. It is both overly edited and undercut.
Having only a quarter of a million dollars, director Nicolas Winding Refn and actor Tom Hardy decided to make a period piece based on true events. Just so you know, period pieces are usually far more expensive to make than contemporary films. And yet they had almost nothing, in terms of budget to pull this movie off. How the hell did they do that?
In my review of Robert Rodriguez's film Machete Kills I speculated that Quentin Tarantino introduced a small reference to Grindhouse movies in Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood to fulfill a rather outlandish promise from the fake trailer of Machete 3 in the beginning of Machete Kills. That there would be a Grindhouse movie with Leonardo DiCaprio. I think Paul Thomas Anderson just beat Tarantino in this regard. His 2025 film One Battle After Another ( starring DiCaprio ) is a straight up remake of the first Machete.
The Predator franchise started its life as a masculine super-macho, mega-violent little B-Movie with Arnold Schwarzenegger. In my review of the first film, I even speculated, for a second, that it might have even been racist. Something that a certain side of political spectrum finds to be a quality of a movie. That certain side of the political spectrum really didn't get when Dan Trachtenberg decided, he is making a feminist, native-American movie in the same franchise.
In the year 2022 Steven Spielberg directed a film about his own life, in a little known feature The Fabelmans. Although not a full documentary, it's semi-fictional nature was still education. The movie was teaching the audience how to make movies, how a single spark of The Greatest Show on Earth inspired Spielberg to become a director.
Ridley Scott has a full family of filmmakers. His brother Tony Scott is a legend. But Ridley also has kids. His son Jake Scott is a bad ass music video director that started already branching out into feature films. Luke Scott directed a cool little 2016 sci-fi horror film Morgan. And was a second unit director on a lot of recent Ridley Scott films. And then there is Jordan Scott, Ridley's daughter that wrote and directed the 2025 thriller A Sacrifice.