blenderdumbass . org
Reviews
by Troler
Free Software fundamentally misses the point. It fails on a practical, ideological, economic, and political level. Letβs examine precisely how (in a slightly different order for the purposes of presentation).
9 Minute Read
White shirt is stained with jam, nose is runny, my body is fuming. Sleepy head is ringing, as the toes are bashing to the pavement. I look like a creeper, at least no one knows where I'm headed. "Do I look suspect, like I've committed a crime?" Nay, there is nothing there. I am just just thankful and pleased that my soul is no longer cynical. Because I am running to watch a James Cameron film. A film by the name of The Odyssey%29), eh... Billie Eilish β Hit Me Hard and Soft: The Tour (Live in 3D).
β© Reply
This warrants an explanation. For I was very hesitant to go the film, I mean, there is little what ties me to Billie Eilish. As I was reading up the Wikipedia page%29) of the movie weeks ago, a peculiar name jumped out to me. 'Twas Robert Rodriguez, who directed the first documentary film about Billie Eilish: Happier Than Ever: A Love Letter to Los Angeles. Jim and Rob have quite a relationship, as both of them worked on Alita: Battle Angel. Why would Jim make a documentary film about the same musician his good pal did half a decade prior?
β© Reply
The conventional story goes as follows, James Cameron was working on the sequel to Game Changers and he bonds with the movie's executive producer Maggie Baird over their vegan lifestyle. As the movie is going to be 3D (it is James Cameron, the director's surname is camera, of course it is in 3D), naturally he tells Maggie Baird about his other 3D demos. Here and there a thought popped into the head, why not film Billie Eilish concert in 3D? That's how the story went. As can be seen in this podcast
But I believe James Cameron is leaving out the part where he wanted to outdo Robert Rodriguez. I mean, the coincidence is too great just to be a fluke. This is James Cameron we're talking about, this is Χ’Χ§Χ, his name literally means to pay attention. And he did.
c:1 β© Reply
Well, how do the movies compare...
β© Reply
I cannot say, for I have not seen the Robert Rodriguez film, I may someday, but now I must leave the story here untold. Maybe BlenderDumbass is going to watch it and take something out of his ass. For now the story ends here.
β© Reply
No, I'm not some tough guy, who likes to play it rough with readers. No, I know my limits, I'm aware this is enough intrigue. I'm not getting away by making you read more and more, just so the text would bloat up and minds would curl. Guys, I'm not that type of guy. My chest is chaste, not puffed up with megalomania. Is it getting difficult to follow what I'm saying? Good, that is intended, since I want you to suffer. I'm not the bad type of person. I'm not the one who's going to mess with your mom, nor girlfriend. No, I'm more likely to seduce your daddy. Because I need sugar. I'm feeling like a bad guy, oh, this is not good. Where is my headed? Billie Eilish!
c:2 β© Reply
Even before I sat down, even before I bought the ticket, my mind was met with the sight of dozens of girls with popcorn and cokes and in their hands. They were no older than 16, no younger than 11. So many adolescent girls, awaiting to watch a 3D James Cameron film. What am I kidding, the focus was Billie Eilish. Why else would they come? The ticket was pricier than usual, which is to be expected, the film is in 3D after all.
β© Reply
What was not expected, was the fact there was a lonely woman sitting at the first row. Her hair was grey and it didn't seem like there was any sort of girl with her. Strange. It seems like even seniors want to see Billie Eilish.
β© Reply
What they got at the start was a timelapse of construction of the arena. That's how the film began. What they got at the end was the deconstruction of the arena. That's how the film ended. Quite poetic, isn't it?
β© Reply
James Cameron was more so an assistant with the 3D than full on visionary, that title goes to Billie Eilish herself. As the documentary revealed, she's quite involved into the whole process. For her, the hue of the lasers matter as much as the actual music. For an artist acutely concerned with a full-sensory experience, having a 3D experience is just a natural evolution.
β© Reply
The plot evolution was not natural. Since it intercut between the entire concert and behind the scenes stuff, achronologically. The main tie-in was the emotional and plot relevance. When Billie Eilish is talking to James Cameron, who's holding a camera as large as his body, about loneliness, there is a cut to a melancholic song.
β© Reply
Not all cuts are ideal. Given the movie was shot during a live concert, it is justifiable to a point. I refer to the jittery point of focus. There were cases where there was a cut to the whole arena and then back to Eilish at a different focal point. For a movie about such an energetic, jumpy person, it is an issue. Of course, I wasn't expecting to see Steven Spielberg or Michael Bay sense of flow. There are more cuts and camera movement during intense song sequences, so the editor, Ben Wainwright-Pearce, knew what he was doing. The movie still has very good editing. I can forgive the frequent fade-to-black in the retrospective.
c:3 β© Reply
What especially caught my attention, was the character of James Cameron. What I saw of him in the behind the scenes of Avatar documentary was just a glimpse, here I had a luxury of watching James Cameron in 3D, like he intended. There was one scene, where the concern ended and the fans at the front were crying their eyes out. And James Cameron asks them what they thought about Billie Eilish performance. The fans are so in the motion of what just occurred, it does not register to them James Cameron is the one asking the questions. I doubt if they were awake they'd care that much, I would. But that has more due to the man being a kindred soul than a successful film-maker.
β© Reply
What's more is that Billie Eilish has a dog petting session during each tour. Given she owns two dog shelters, as does her family. No wonder her mother Maggie is vegan, eating meat in front a dog is just cruel. This petting helps the musician to unwind. James Cameron find the experience pleasing and states that he'll do it next time in his movie. So, expect there to be canines in the set of Ghosts Of Hiroshima.
c:4 β© Reply
The beaming energy of Billie Eilish was channeled in an intriguing way, that of the camera. When she sung Bad Guy, it was not enough to run around the stage jumping around and getting the crowd hyped up. No, she picked up a handheld 3D camera, sang, jumped and ran around. For the real audience, the camera was not the biggest thing, but for the cinema seers, 'twas a whole another level. Seeing the singers face up close felt surreal and intimate. The movie did emphasize intimacy between Eilish, people are her and the audience, so it makes sense.
β© Reply
Sensitivity is the core of the film. When there was a sad song I can't recall the name of, I don't listen to Billie Eilish movie, if you didn't get that by this point, had a profound impact on the audience. Both on and away from the screen. To a point where they were sobbing, eyes all red and watery. I hear girls behind the seat crying with the people. For them, the concert was not just on the screen, it was just there, in real life.
β© Reply
3D bridges that gap. During the tail end of the film, there was a giant explosion of confetti. I can't emphasize how real everything looked. With so many tiny moving objects, 3D truly shined. There were cases where I just wanted to reach out and touch that confetti. But it just continued to fall to the ground. My hands couldn't intercept it, but the heart felt moved, to a point of being able to assume the pictographic fiction as reality.
β© Reply
Then the movie ended with a souring applause. It felt like I was in an actual concert. The girls were so moved by the experience, they for a moment believed they were in a concert.
β© Reply
Am I mad? Do I enjoy being mad? How come I felt like the disturbance the audience made by clapping actually improved the experience? I guess, it was because I didn't feel alone. I'm not scared to say it and I mean it. When you see the movie for the Billie Eilish directorial prowess combined with James Cameron experience, you get a great mix. It smells perfect, not like some cheap cologne of another film trying buck off a music star).
c:5 β© Reply
Fin.
β© Reply
1
Find this post on Mastodon
Predator 1987 was always a B-movie
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/95/Predator_Movie.jpg/250px-Predator_Movie.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
π 20 π¬ 3
As I observed in my review of Predator 2, the Predator films feel very B-movie-like. And the first film, John McTiernan's 1987 Predator is not an exception.
#predator #horror #ArnoldSchwarzenegger #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Don't Look Up 2021 is Melancholia, but a comedy
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5c/Don%27t_Look_Up_2021_film.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
π 30 π¬ 4
A lot of people see the 2021 Adam McKay film Don't Look Up as something that fails to communicate the message of climate change well enough. McKay stated that the movie was written specifically to point people at the absurdity of the "climate crisis". And yet the film's allegorical comet / asteroid doomsday plot seems to fail at giving it justice. For once an asteroid that is about to destroy the planet is nobody's fault. While the climate change is somebody's fault. But if you look at the movie relatively to other disaster flicks of the same type ( like Armageddon and Melancholia ) you see something rather interesting.
#dontlookup #climatechange #adammckay #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
The Killing of a Sacred Deer 2017 is Yorgos Lanthimos's attempt to show Lars Von Trier how to properly corrupt the audience
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8f/The_Killing_of_a_Sacred_Deer.png)
Blender Dumbass
π 15 β€ 1 π¬ 4
I was afraid of 2017 absurdist horror film by Yorgos Lanthimos The Killing of a Sacred Deer, because I know it involves a murder of a child. Ever since Lars Von Trier utterly traumatized me with his depiction of this very thing in The House That Jack Built I avoid movies like this. But seeing Bugonia the other day, where I attempted to psycho-sexually analyse Lanthimos, I realized that I avoided a movie that potentially has a lot of what I need for such an analysis. So I braved myself and saw the damn film. Now I think the film was about corrupting the audience enough that they would feel good about a child being murdered. I'm not joking. That is how the movie is structured.
#thekillingofthesacreddeer #YorgosLanthimos #horror #film #movies #review #cinemastodon
A Sacrifice 2025 is a bit amateurish
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a8/A_Sacrifice_poster.jpg/250px-A_Sacrifice_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
π 9 π¬ 1
Ridley Scott has a full family of filmmakers. His brother Tony Scott is a legend. But Ridley also has kids. His son Jake Scott is a bad ass music video director that started already branching out into feature films. Luke Scott directed a cool little 2016 sci-fi horror film Morgan. And was a second unit director on a lot of recent Ridley Scott films. And then there is Jordan Scott, Ridley's daughter that wrote and directed the 2025 thriller A Sacrifice.
#ASacrifice #JordanScott #EricBana #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Weapons 2025 should be nominated for best picture
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6d/Weapons_film_2025.jpeg/250px-Weapons_film_2025.jpeg)
Blender Dumbass
π 19 π¬ 1
It is not often that a horror films appears to tickle the right nerves from the high-brow crowd of cinema critics. With 93% Rotten Tomatoes score though, it is safe to assume that Zach Cregger's Weapons from 2025 is one of those rare movies.
#weapons #horror #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Powered with BDServer
Plugins
Themes
Analytics
Contact
Mastodon