[icon ] blenderdumbass . org

Free Software
Title
Author
Post Text
Description
Comments
Hashtags


[icon reviews]RoboCop 1987 foreshadows a lot

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 3 💬 0



There are ( at least ) 3 types of movies: Corporate bullshit, like the shit Disney produces now a days, which for some reason are popular as heck; smart films with a strong message, which win awards but fail at the box office; and the third type: a film with a message, disguised as corporate bullshit, to trick the audiences that it's the shit they wanna see, while actually being the shit they need to see. Paul Verhoeven's 1987 film RoboCop is from the third type.


#RoboCop #NancyAllen #PaulVerhoeven #film #review #movies #politics


[icon reviews]Basic Instinct 1992 is Verhoeven trying to be De Palma who is trying to be Hitchcock

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 3 💬 1



It is known that the best films from Alfred Hitchcock were done during the days of the code. The restrictions on nudity and graphic violence gave us iconic Hitchcockian moments like the shower scene in Psycho, where Hitch pulls of a totally kosher psycho-sexual ejaculation of ultra-violence. When the code gave way to the MPAA rating system, Hitchcock didn't really know how to react, producing mediocre films, giving way to directors like Brian De Palma who stepped into his shoes, to give us, more-modern Hitchcockian thrillers like Dressed To Kill. But by the end of the 80s, as De Palma stepped down from this Hitch-immitation role, and before Robert Zemeckis ultimately took this title with his 2000 film What Lies Beneath, there was also Paul Verhoeven and his psycho-sexual thrillers, like 1992 Basic Instinct.


#BasicInstinct #PaulVerhoeven #SharonStone #MichaelDouglas #film #review #movies #cinemastodon



[icon user] Login