[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon scene] Articles

Steven Spielberg Promotes Sharing

January 06, 2023

👁 95

https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=jurassic&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1
https://www.google.com/ : 👁 2
License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 3 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


20 Minute Read



When you make a film, you tent to seek inspiration and advice from those who make good films. Before September my main activities were my job and the articles I write. I did some programming on the side. Like the infamous FastLBRY LBRY client. But that was it. ↩ Reply

Since I bought the new computer and now have a capacity to get real work done, I continue my movie project that I started back in the beginning of 2020. So I make a film. Daily. And therefor I seek inspiration and advice from those who make good films. ↩ Reply

It should not be a surprise that I clicked on an hour long interview between James Cameron, J.J.Abrams and Steven Spielberg. What was a surprise though, was what they said. I bookmarked the section in my browser, here is the link. ↩ Reply

Here is a transcript: ↩ Reply

Steven Spielberg: ↩ Reply

You have to understand that this is... this is a... an amazingly collaborative... open information medium that we're in. That there is no such thing... and that there should never be any such thing as trade secrets. There should be nothing like that. That's should all be open. We find, discover something, we should be so proud of it, we should invite everybody in to take a look at it. The way you got all of us on to the stage at Playa to watch how... you know, your movie Avatar was, was just starting out. It-it-and this is how we discover these things. So... yeah... I'll take credit for being open-minded enough to say to Dennis Muren - "Okay we're gonna change the paradigm... We gonna shoot all of Jurassic Park digitally. You know, with digital dinosaurs." And ah... And there is only 60 shots in the movie, you know. There is only 60 digital dinosaur shots in all of Jurassic Park. There is like 350 Stan Winston puppets. So Stan Winston has the majority of credit for Jurassic Park. But ah... but those 60 shots kind of started a whole new era.
↩ Reply

James Cameron: ↩ Reply

Yeah, but the balance continuously shifted away from prosthetics and more towards...
↩ Reply

Steven Spielberg: ↩ Reply

Yes. That's true...
↩ Reply

James Cameron: ↩ Reply

...digital in the subsequent Jurassic Park films. Right?
↩ Reply

Steven Spielberg: ↩ Reply

Right... right... because the second Jurassic Park film that I directed had 180 digital shots.
↩ Reply

James Cameron: ↩ Reply

Yeah. But your point is, is absolutely critical. You know, that a... if we are, if we're as Open Source as we can be, it's, it's... it's enlightening self-interest. Other people are gonna go, advance the, the... you know, the technique. And the next time we want to do something, solve a special problem, somebody else would have figured out how to do it. You know, when I wrote Avatar I didn't know how to make it. And nobody did. But I knew that other people would be figuring out all the pieces of it. That over time... All I had to do is wait. You know?
↩ Reply

Yes. James Cameron used "Open Source" instead of "Libre" or "Free". And it kind of tickles some language breaking nerves. I bet Richard Stallman would have written a whole essay on this use of "Open Source". But I also bet if he would hear how terribly they talk, he would get just angry. It feels like they both need speech coaches. Or they might even have ADHD. Both of them. Which is kind of a good thing. You know, I found out recently that it's far more entertaining to listen to a talk of a person that has ADHD, compared to a person that is focused. But all of that is besides the point. ↩ Reply

Probably two of the biggest film directors of the last 40 or so years, kind of agree with freedom in a way. Probably they just care about the tools that they use to do their job. Similar to how I might feel about Blender or various Blender-Organizers that I wrote. Or if we are talking about this article, how I might feel about Emacs. And if you come to James or Steven and ask them to put a Creative Commons license on the final film, they might swear at you. But maybe not. And they truly care about freedom. And that's the studios that force stupid restrictions to be present on the customers of the films. ↩ Reply

Anyway. What an unexpected place to find something to do with Free Software, isn't it? Let's talk about film-making, Libre Culture and how they are connected, or could be connected. ↩ Reply

But first... on a totally related ( film-making note )... ↩ Reply

↩ Reply

[embedded image]


I hate her bicep in this image. Though I already fixed it for the movie itself. ↩ Reply

This was a very good week for the Moria's Race project. I've advanced from talkie walkie scenes to action. I mean, there will be action is just about a few shots from now, from when I'm typing. Expect the next live-stream to contain some already. If not the next one, than the next after the next one. I don't think you need to wait until the next after the next after the next one. ↩ Reply

Here is, by the way, a short summary of what's done during the last week ( And yes I'm aware about the length of the video. It took me two days to compress a week of footage into an hour. So it is a "short summary"... shut up!): ↩ Reply

lbry://@blenderdumbass#f/mr-ph-w3#e ↩ Reply

( Please comment something on it. I need to know if I'm doing well or not. ) ↩ Reply

On the other note I'm very worried for the Odysee corporation. See, every live-stream that I make generates about 5 GB ( 4 hours ) of video recording. And then I publish them to LBRY. Which means that those videos get uploaded to the Odysee's servers as well. Just to keep them around in case nobody else wants to host them. That would not be a big problem, but the full live-stream recordings are not watched by people. The first one got about 10 view total. And the other ones are at 0 each. ↩ Reply

Maybe we can all just take a bit less than 72 hours of our lives and watch the full recordings, so they get above 0. But ultimately the choice is yours. Hope you'll waste your time with me. ↩ Reply

They are available on: lbry://@MoriasRace:3 ↩ Reply


[embedded image]


What would be the film industry if film directors didn't talk to each other?


If we go backwards versus forwards... I want to do it, so not to spoil the result ahead of the time ...we can imagine a further set of events: ↩ Reply

Ready Player One or Tintin would not be made. Since James Cameron would not provide Steven Spielberg with the necessary knowledge of "How to shoot Avatar?". It could seems like a trivial task. It took James Cameron only about 14 years to make the Avatar 2 trailer. Let's see how long it's gonna take till the release itself. But it's still just 14 years. I'm older than that. I'm as old as two Avatar movie productions. So it's rather trivial, isn't it. ↩ Reply

Well, the production of both TinTin and Ready Player One ( not even talking about the not-marvelous boring marvel universe of tele-shows ) are highly dependent on the same kinds of technologies that were used on the first Avatar. Things like virtual cameras and face capturing rigs were developments of various technical teams under the supervision of James Cameron the king the first. ↩ Reply

Of course if directors would not talk to each other, Avatar itself would not be made. See, motion capture was not a development for Avatar. Films like Peter Jackson's King Kong and scary "uncanny valley" cartoons of *Bobert Zemeckis, like the infamous Christmas film where all of the characters are played by Tom Hanks used motion capture. Gollumn from a movie that some people use as a marriage ring could be considered a motion capture creature. Even though it was much more manual. Hell, Titanic has motion capture. Terminator 2 has a form of motion capture. And it was made in 1992. ↩ Reply

But what about simple things? Suspense, for example was made popular by Alfred Hitchcock. Having "cock" in your name is probably profound. I could not even imagine how much terror and suspense there might be with a cock that is hitchhiking. Maybe because of these fact he could have figured out suspense on his own. But he didn't invent it. He, as everybody else, learned it from somebody else. ↩ Reply

If you take everything in life. If people do not communicate, there is no progress. If people did not develop speech. We would have forgotten long time ago about the invention of fire. And then wheel. Imagine the fire being proprietary. And only one person can know how to make one. Imagine lighting another fire from a fire and then getting a copyright violation notice. ↩ Reply

Of course everything could be reverse engineered. Perhaps fire was reverse engineered. Perhaps a lightning storm caused a branch to light up. Or too much sun caused a bush to light up. And a primitive person saw the fire and though that it's warm and useful for some things. And tried to replicate it. Maybe... Also it could be an accidental discovery. The thing is. This person shared his knowledge with others. And therefor started the human race. ↩ Reply

Before there was fire, there was no cooked food. Before there was cooked food, people had to chew all day long to get some nutrition. Try eating meat raw. It's very hard to chew. And then it's very badly digesting. Therefor to have energy from food, you have to eat a lot of it and therefor eat all the time. But as soon as you cook the meat it chews nicely and digests quickly. Not even talking about that it's more tasty when cooked. So if fire was not developed, people would not have time to do anything else. They would just eat all the time. ↩ Reply

But now that there is fire, there is a lot of free time. And therefor a lot of possibility to get curious. To learn, to share knowledge. To progress as species. My big brain, so big that Marvin the Paranoid Android would definitely be sad about it, is a consequence of the person who invented sharing his knowledge with other people. Perhaps by the standards of IQ tests and alike that person was a complete dumbass. But yet, he is a genius, compared to some people in our lifetimes. I'm looking at you, the entirety of Apple Corporation. ↩ Reply

Free Software and the Film Industry


It's rather strange to think that film industry would use Free Software. After all, they have the money to purchase software that is proprietary. And that's true. And they do use a bunch of Autodesk Mayas and Adobe Photoshops. But guess what else the film industry uses... ↩ Reply

Blender, for example, the program that started the whole "Blender Dumbass" joke to begin with... The program I use to animate Moria's Race... One of the most complex and huge Free Software projects, probably behind only GNU, Emacs and a very small thing called the Linux Kernel... This program is starting to slowly show up in the film industry. ↩ Reply

The first time Blender was used in a Major Motion Picture was in 2004. And in non other than Spiderman 2 directed by Sam Raimi. I would not be surprised if the idea to use Blender was Raimi's brain-child. He is enough of a giggly dude to do that kind of thing. Mind you - it was before Elephant Dreams. This nightmare came out only in 2006. And only with Elephant Dreams we can say that Blender finally had it's true potential unlocked. ↩ Reply

In 2004 during the production of Spiderman 2 Raimi wanted to use a technique he learned from different directors. Instead of drawing storyboards on paper, you could make them move by doing them in a computer, using a 3D animation program. The problem was, anything that's the CGI department uses was a bit too costly. And it was something he probably only experimented with. So I believe he just typed in "Free 3D Editor" and got Blender. ↩ Reply

Today a lot of films use Blender in the production of the final shots. I know that I will mention a film outside of Hollywood. But they did provide a useful article about how they used Blender. So here we go. The Biggest Film in India - "RRR" directed by Kaduri Srisaila Sri Rajamouli has a lot of shots rendered inside Blender with Cycles ( Blender's path-tracing rendering engine ). ↩ Reply

[embedded image]
↩ Reply

But this is not the only place Blender is used in films. If you scroll though the articles on Blender.org you can find many examples of various studios, both in VFX and animation, that use Blender for a lot of things, if not for the entirety of production. For example Next Gen was produced entirely with Blender by an Unfortunately Dissolved Canadian Studio. ↩ Reply

Blender artists sneak even into places like Pixar. Colin Levy, for example, worked at Pixar for a few years. He is also known as the director of perhaps the best movie made by Blender Foundation ( before it was called "Blender Studio" and before they released Spring ) - Sintel. Spring rivals Sintel quite well. But not on a story level. Colin is a master at story. By the way, he quit Pixar to make a small short film which took him years to make called Skywatch. By the way, he managed to get Jude Law involved. I would not be able to do that. I don't have the money to travel to London. And also, by the way, the VFX for this film were also done with Blender. ↩ Reply

But how about something other than Blender? Well related to Blender there is the existence of such formats like OpenEXR developed by Industrial Light and Magic, a company started by George Lucas and a company responsible for Jar Jar Binks. They did not try to make the format proprietary like some kind of Autodesk would. There is also the Open Shading Language which sounds like something related to OpenGL, but no... It's a something that helps somehow with rendering pretty images. And it was developed strangely by the godfather of bad companies, Sony. And then released as Free Software, because Film Industry is all about collaboration, I suppose. According to the Wikipedia page, it first appeared in the 2012 Men In Black film. And the interview from the beginning of this article is from the August of 2011. Maybe one thing has something to do with another. Steven Spielberg, mind you, was one of the producers on the Men In Black film. ↩ Reply

Also there is Cine Paint
  • a fork of GIMP developed by Hollywood, for Hollywood. They do have the money to use Photoshop. But apparently sometimes they need to make a few modifications to the software that they are using.( Free Software is about Freedom, not price ) For example, by the name of their fork we could assume, that they needed a better, more realistic, paint tool. And they made it using the source code of GIMP. ↩ Reply


Hollywood loves Free Software and the free culture. There are just two problems: ↩ Reply

  • They have the money to buy proprietary software, so they don't think twice. - Their main-people are usually copyright-minded imbeciles. ↩ Reply

Conclusion


We sometimes get this feeling of elevated self-worth when imagining ourselves doing something most people don't. When we imagine ourselves in the center of the attention. I was guilty of it myself. And might still sometimes be guilty of it. When I was 14 I remember thinking that I am such a genius that if I write texts with mistakes in them and then digitize them by typing the words into a computer, I have to keep all of the mistakes, since they are all parts of my immense genius. You would not want to be my friend when I was 14. I would think you are simply one of my fans. While I literally had only filmed just this crap by then. ↩ Reply

When you get this feeling you don't want things to be easy for other people. And therefor you kind of don't want things to be easy at all. You want all to struggle and just your immense genius will somehow magically get though all of it. Back then I heard Steven Spielberg talk about the new cellphones and cheap digital cameras. And how it's easy to make a film these days. And with something like Blender being good and becoming more and more popular I felt that something about this seems not right. Too much competition. ↩ Reply

Today I grew to appreciate competition. I know that I will not make the best movie ever, probably ever. There is a chance. But I don't even have a smallest chance of knowing how small the chance is. I know, though, that I can learn on my previous attempts to make my next attempts closer to the best movie ever. I'm Not Even Human was wooden and badly animated. Moria's Race is far more alive and I take far more care with animation on it. But it's still has it's challenges, that I had not though about, could exist. For example, even though the hand rigs of Moria's Race's characters are endlessly more usable than the crap I had to use in I'm Not Even Human, the hand rigs in Moria's Race are shit regardless. If I Alt-R and then Alt-G on them, it gives me a weirdly too open of a palm. Which makes shaping the bloody thing very annoying. Also they don't have fingernails. Perhaps on next film. ↩ Reply

Competition and collaboration, but more importantly when you can do friendly, collaborative competition - it's the way we, humans, move towards the future. The funny thing is we never get there. Since as soon as we get there it's no longer future, but instead the present. And then quickly it becomes the past. But we should not stop because of this peculiar way the words work. We should aim forward, instead of inside. By "inside" I mean - like when you are not collaborating... Like a secret thingy... Anyway I'm too tried to make sense at this point. ↩ Reply


Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply


[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[icon question]











[icon reviews]So what is the meaning of Kill Bill?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 16 ❤ 3 🔄 1 💬 1



In December of 2025, my neighbor, Quentin Tarantino finally released Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair. The film that was originally meant to be, but that was unfortunately cut into two volumes upon its original release, 2 decades ago. Therefore for this review I will be treating Volume 1 and Volume 2 as one film, even though it has a rather substantial intermission in its not-directors-cut version. Re-experiencing the story of the Bride and her revenge, for this review, filled me with some rather profound questions. Questions that I believe I started asking in my review of Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood. Questions as to: what is the meaning of Kill Bill?


#killbill #quentintarantino #tarantino #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Predator: Killer of Killers knows how to do a lot with very little

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 54 💬 4



It seems like the movie Trachtenberg was going for here was way too risky and way too ambitious for a studio to green-light it normally. But if he can do that on a fraction of budget. As animation. And not a budget, something like Pixar uses for their ultra-realistic stuff and fluent motion. But on a fraction of that. He can use the trend of animating on-twos and making everything painterly, to cut all of the corners necessary to make this insane movie with the small amount of money that he is given.


#predator #killerOfKillers #PredatorKillerOfKillers #animation #film #movies #cinemastodon #review #DanTrachtenberg


[icon articles]Michael Bay is a Properly Good Director and I Will Stand by it Because it is True

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 72 💬 2



It seems like the entire world of film-enthusiasts came together and decided to bully one person for no reason what so ever. And that one person is Michael Bay.


#MichaelBay #Cinema #Film #Filmmaking #Auteur #Action #Transformers #BadBoys


[icon articles]GPL doesn't make the program libre

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Troler

👁 31 ❤ 1 🔄 1 💬 5



I don't consider freedom binary, for me some things are inherently more free than others. Here I define freedom as the capacity to do a task unhindered. With such definition, it comes to be clear, what I mean by freedom not being binary and existing on an axis. For instance, repairing a standard PC is easier than the newest model of iPhone. This ease of repairability exists on a gradient, with the PC and iPhone being on different sides. The same applies to the actual binary, software world as well. It is easier to modify a program written in Python than the same one written in C. In Python there is no need to keep recompiling and seeing the changes, all alterations can be done on the fly.


#freesoftware #opensource #paternalism #gnu #libre #chrome #firefox #emacs #philosophy #essay #enshittification


[icon articles]A Libre Replacement Software for People Stuck at War in Israel

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 80



I developed a Libre replacement for the proprietary missile attack warnings app by פיקוד העורף, so I will not lose my freedom by trying to keep myself alive in the conflict with Iran.


#israel #HomeFrontCommand #IDF #security #Iran #פיקוד_העורף #FreeSoftware #libre #Freedom #OpenSource


[icon reviews]The Naked Gun ( 2025 ) is a descent movie about enshitification, but not as funny as the originals

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 15



Paramount snatched "The Naked Gun" / "Police Squad" rights from Jerry Zucker and Jim Abrahams and instead gave the material to a different Jew Akiva Schaffer to adopt. And while Schaffer is a good comedy / parody director, it seems like the movie ended up being just "merely clever".


#theNakedGun #policesquad #LiamNeeson #PamelaAnderson #film #review #comedy #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Is "2001: A Space Odyssey" a comedy?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 17 💬 1



Stanley Kubrick is known for making... well... he is known primarily for making 2001: A Space Odyssey... but most of his other films are black-comedies that poke fun at some rather dark aspects of the society. Full Metal Jacket is undeniably a comedy that pokes fun at the Vietnam war. Dr. Strangelove is a comedy that pokes fun at the absurdity of nuclear weapons. Hell even Lolita is a comedy. And a very funny one at that. So in the middle of all this, Kubrick decides to make a movie about space and stuff. And makes 2001: A Space Odyssey. So is it a comedy as well?


#ASpaceOdyssey #StanleyKubrick #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon articles]The Danger Of Good Intentions


[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 89 💬 4



Paternalism - a world view that states that sometimes forcing a person against their freedom, if for their own good, is acceptable. A good example is the collapsing bridge thought experiment. A bridge is about to collapse and you know it for certain. You advertise this fact so people will not go onto the bridge. You put signs. You tell people about it. But somebody still walks toward the bridge with what looks like an intention to cross it anyway. You show that person the signs. No response. You yell at the person "The bridge is about to collapse!". No response either. You realize that the person probably doesn't even speak English. Is it okay to force this person, to reduce his freedom, and force him out of the bridge?


[icon articles]Is BeamNG Drive a Free Software Game

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 214



Once upon the time, I remember feeling utterly unpleasant toward playing racing games where cars did not break. I thought that GTA games, for example, were far more realistic because making mistakes and crashing into something is going to break the car and therefor you have to drive more carefully. Yes I was a strange kid. But I did enjoy games such as Flat Out where the objective is to crash your car as much as possible. I think I liked games that simulate reality, rather then those that are just made for fun. You could imagine how excited I was when I saw videos of this new racing game that came out at about 2013 called BeamNG Drive. A game where cars don't just swap body shapes with pre-modeled deformations. But a game that simulates the destruction fully. Using soft body physics. I didn't play it. At first my computer was way too slow and there was no GNU / Linux support. Then the game became paid. Then I changed from being a mere "Linux user" to being a "GNU / Linux user", which meant that this game is not good for my freedom. But is it though?


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]