[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Call Me By Your Name

January 06, 2024

👁 71

https://blenderdumbass.org/ : 👁 1

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 2 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


8 Minute Read



Being a fan of mostly action cinema, and plot heavy thrillers makes it feel as if Call Me By Your Name has no plot what so ever. But it is a mistake. Luca Guadagnino is a kind of director that tends to film very subtle movies. But if you are paying attention and you are invested in the characters themselves, those movies tend to have very strong effects. This is why I love Call Me By Your Name so much. It is as if I went on a vacation to Italy myself and spent my time with the characters of this movie. As if I had become their friend. And as if I myself got invested in their day to day little struggles. ↩ Reply

In the age of LGBTQP+ this movie scares a lot of people on the right side of the political spectrum. It is a love story between two men. Actually I am lying. It is a love story between a man and a teenage boy. He is deliberately illegal. I think it is a kind of Luca Guadagnino's method of making us feel the same amount of paranoia that people of their sexual orientation might feel. There is a scene where Oliver, the older man, doubts that Elliot, the teenage boy, has any feelings for him for real. He thinks that perhaps the stuff that they did last night were a kind of way for the boy to take control over him, or something. And even that paranoia aspect of the film is very subtly communicated by Guadagnino. If you wonder off a little bit too much, you will miss it. ↩ Reply

The movie is perhaps a bit too subtle. But that is a kind of quality a movie should have in some way. The subtlety of this film makes you loose some things about it. And I think it's very much intentional. So the next time around, when you re-watch it, you feel like you have discovered something new. ↩ Reply

This movie is one of those multi-lingual experiences. People speak English sometimes. Sometimes they decide to speak Italian. Sometimes they speak French. Sometimes it's German. And the whole cast of characters is like that. You can follow the movie without any subtitles. I just watched it without subtitles and it was okay. But some scenes were like watching people talk a different language. I personally don't mind a little guessing. I mean I watch films from India and Thailand without any form of translation and if a director is good I will still be able to follow the plot. Luca Guadagnino is that good. He directs good enough and actors emote good enough that you don't need no dialog to understand what is going on. ↩ Reply

The dialogue in this movie is a lot of fun too. I like it when a scene is written in such a way where as an audience member you are an active participant. I remember a scene from Pulp Fiction when they talk about pork and somebody says something funny. It is both funny for the audience. And the actors are laughing too. And there is a line in the dialogue acknowledging that it is funny. Which is something very risky to try to do. What if the joke doesn't land? But when it does work, it works wonderfully. Call Me By Your Name has stuff like that. There is a scene where one of the characters is reading a passage from a thing he wrote. And it doesn't make any sense to him. And it doesn't make any sense to me, watching it, either. And it's not like one of those scenes where a scientist is talking on a science language and somebody asks him to speak English instead. Those I can follow. Often, those science things are very simple. Here it's a really confusing piece of philosophy that stops having any meaning half way through but sound like something somebody would have written with intend of having meaning. And the scene is not about understanding it. But about being confused by it. ↩ Reply

The movie is borderline pornographic. Well, kind of. The most you will see is tits. Which is weird, because it is a movie about gays. Though the only actual nudity is a female breast. Teenage breast! Illegal teenage breast. Luca Guadagnino doesn't give a damn. But the non-nude sexual stuff is borderline pornographic anyway. Like the shot will be composed to conceal private parts. But they are there in the actor's face. Like there is a shot of Elliot simply grabbing the ball-sack of Oliver. No trickery. Real grab, done for real. Though Oliver is wearing shorts in that scene. So you don't see the ball-sack itself. Just feel the grab of it through the clothes. The actors of the teenagers in fact were a bit older than the characters they were playing. Which speaks a lot about the casting of the movie. Elliot played by Timothee Chalamet was like 19 I think while making the movie. But he plays a 16-17 year old. So it was legal for Chalamet to grab Oliver's ball-sack. Oliver was played by Armie Hammer. ↩ Reply

Toward the middle of the movie there is a scene with a peach. I wrote a whole thing about that particular scene in a different post of mine. It's that good. ↩ Reply

Guadagnino is good at realistically portraying sex. And I'm not talking about the pornography of the act. I'm talking about the tension and the nervousness. The playful unsureness of it all. The awkwardness of not knowing what to do next. The silliness of doing something from which you will feel shame, shame which you will disregard immediately since you are horny. And the roler-coaster of emotions that comes right after. This movie has a very emotionally realistic first sex scene with a girl. And then a very emotionally realistic first sex scene with a guy. Don't ask me how I know. ↩ Reply

The film fills you up with so much joy that it's devastating to have the film be over. I was expecting a tense drama about how they should conceal themselves from Elliot's parents or whatever. And there is a little bit of it. But then the father just kind of knows and is okay with it immediately. There is nothing actually terrible happening. You can say that Elliot cheated his girlfriend with Oliver. That is probably the worst part. And even with that she, I assume, is forgiving him. ( Though to be frank, they speak French so I have no idea what they are talking about ). ↩ Reply

I can explain why this movie works by drawing a parallel between it and the swimming scenes in Avatar 2. They are pointless on paper, but they give the movie so much atmosphere that you never want them to end. Call Me By Your Name is just the swimming scenes from Avatar 2. Nothing else. And it is brilliant. ↩ Reply

I guess I have to touch on the directing style. There are a few Spielberg oners in this film. You know, long shots that are done in such a way that you don't notice that they are long shots. Guadagnino knows what he is doing. Though it seems like the budget ( $ 3.5 million ) was very limiting. Most scenes feel like the only gear they had was a tripod. The camera only pivots. Very rarely does the camera moves anywhere though space. There are a few high impact, good looking, smooth camera moves. But they are very rare. Most of the moves are on tripod. If there are any moves at all. ↩ Reply

There is an epic scene that would probably not wow too many people. It is subtly epic. It is a long take of Elliot playing the same melody on a piano using different styles. All of it done for real. And not only did Chalamet learn how to play piano for that. He also acts his ass off. This is the kind of shit this movie is very good at. Subtle Epicness. ↩ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply


[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[icon question]











[icon reviews]Ballerina 2025 did what Spy Kids should have but couldn't

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 8 💬 2



When I reviewed Havoc I wrote about this strange feeling that I dubbed "short orgasmic blackout" when I see a stupidly serious, angry face of a female character that is really cute. And one of the most cutest actors living these days is fucking Ana de Armas. Let me illustrate. We see young Victoria Comte playing Eve ( the main character ) while being 11 ( Comte was born in 2013, do the math ), and then the film says "12 years later" so now she is 23. Yet de Armas playing her is 36 ( at the time of filming ). She plays somebody almost half her age and it works. Why? She is fucking cute! That's why. And because of that I knew I was probably getting the "short orgasmic blackout" the movie.


#balerina #johnwick #anadearmas #movies #film #review #cinemastodon #action #cinema


[icon reviews]F1 is suprisingly relatable

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 16



As you probably figured out, the movie is about racing. It is kind of similar to Ford v Ferrari where you have an underdog team trying to compete on a race with Ferrari to win the race. In this case though, Ferrari was not the fastest car on the track. The fastest one was from Red Bull. And not just from Red Bull. It was Lewis Hamilton who is an actual real F1 driver, who also played himself in the film and who was one of the producers on the film.


#F1 #racing #movie #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #BradPitt #JavierBardem #JosephKosinski #formula1


[icon articles]The Danger Of Good Intentions


[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 86 💬 4



Paternalism - a world view that states that sometimes forcing a person against their freedom, if for their own good, is acceptable. A good example is the collapsing bridge thought experiment. A bridge is about to collapse and you know it for certain. You advertise this fact so people will not go onto the bridge. You put signs. You tell people about it. But somebody still walks toward the bridge with what looks like an intention to cross it anyway. You show that person the signs. No response. You yell at the person "The bridge is about to collapse!". No response either. You realize that the person probably doesn't even speak English. Is it okay to force this person, to reduce his freedom, and force him out of the bridge?


[icon reviews]Citizen Kane feels like a Scorsese picture

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 8 💬 1



Orson Welles ( born in 1915 ) being a 25 - 26 year old flipped the cinematic landscape upside down with his 1941 black and white film Citizen Kane. A film that feels like a mandatory watch for anybody who is even remotely interested in cinema. People say that Citizen Kane is the best film ever made and stuff. Almost forcing that film onto people in an uncomfortable way. Making you be sure that it is some sort of experimental, black and white extravaganza that you will not understand. And that it is way too old, for today's audience, to enjoy. And that to appreciate the qualities of the film, one needs to learn some academic bullshit and pay very strong attention, to try to understand why back in 1941 critics specifically, might have liked what they saw. The thought of watching Citizen Kane feels like homework. But then you actually watch it.


#citizenkane #orsonwelles #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #martinscorsese


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]