blenderdumbass . org
Reviews
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
From 1 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.
4 Minute Read
The first thing you notice when watching Michael Bay's directorial debut Bad Boys is that the movie is not trying to be a Michael Bay film. There was no Michael Bay films prior to it. Bay was doing music videos and commercials before this film. And while those do have some of the style Bay will eventually bring over to his cinema pictures, here it seems he is actually trying something else entirely. The best analogy for the movie would be Tony Scott's 1993 film True Romance written by Quentin Tarantino.
โฉ Reply
The first scene of the movie sets up the characters of Mike Lowrey ( Will Smith ) and Marcus Burnett ( Martin Lawrence ), with a conversation that goes wrong and then goes stupidly wrong. The inspiration from the Tarantino dialogue is stupidly apparent. Pulp Fiction was released in May of 1994, while the Principal Photography for Bad Boys started in June ( a month later ), while the Tarantino picture was still probably in the cinemas.
โฉ Reply
There is a lot of stories from set about how much Michael Bay hated the dialogue in the script. And how much he wanted to elevate it to something much greater. And thus most of the dialogue you hear in the film they came with on set during filming. Or even totally improvised. So it's safe to assume that a huge influence of Tarantino seeped into the dialogue of this movie as a result. There is even a "Big Kahuna" reference at one point.
โฉ Reply
Compared to Bad Boys 2 this movie is surprisingly tame. While the second movie goes full Bayhem!, this movie is not. Probably because there was no budget here. There is Michael Bay stuff in it. There are explosions. There are things falling from cars during a car chase. And there are techniques that Bay will refine later. Like the spinning camera shot he is famous for, or the way he shoots closeups of people during a high intensity car chase. But most of the movie feels like it's not even Michael Bay. But like it is Tony Scott or something. The intense filter in the opening sequence is reminiscent of the intense filter Scott used for the opening of Top Gun. And later a lot of the tone and techniques feel like imitations of Scott.
โฉ Reply
Therefor if Bay was going for something like Tony Scott stylistically, while for something like Tarantino with the dialogue, this movie is kind of like True Romance, where Scott actually directed Tarantino's dialogue.
โฉ Reply
Yet towards the end the movie shifts a little. By the end of the film, Bay is awaken and unleashed. It is not the modern Bay yet. It is not Bay who knows how to Bayhem! properly. It is a raw baby Bay boy who will eventually grow into the Bay we know now. But it is unmistakably Bay.
โฉ Reply
I think that Tรฉa Leoni's casting was a bit weird. She really looks fucking cool in the trio of the motherfuckers in the end of the film. And she is properly hot for being a girl in a Michael Bay movie. But something about her voice specifically makes me think that she doesn't really fit the material. When watching the movie in a Russian dub ( long time ago ) I don't remember having this issue. But watching it with the original sound something about her strikes me as strange.
โฉ Reply
That said, she does have some bad ass moments in the film. The shot of her entering the night club to kill the bastard that killed her friend is fucking epic. And while Bay turns her character into a soft-core non-nude pornography, she is kind of cool actually. Maybe the voice helps with it in a strange way. She doesn't sound like she is trying to seduce the audience, and therefor it balances out the pornography. Which gives her character more character, so to speak.
c:1 โฉ Reply
Happy Hacking!!!
โฉ Reply
1
Find this post on Mastodon

Blue Steel 1990 is the seed that grew into the reason Avatar didn't win best picture
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/37/Blue_Steel_%281990_film%29.jpg/250px-Blue_Steel_%281990_film%29.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
๐ 12 โค 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 3
So it's 1990 and Kathryn Bigelow writes and directs an action thriller about a police officer. The police officer is female and the movie almost refuses to sexualize her. Bigelow casts a nice half-Jewish girl Jamie Lee Curtis. And pretty much the whole movie, not a single shot of her emphasizes or admires her body ( apart from one sex scene where we see a very erotic closeup of her stomach ). Making that movie technically feminist. Few years later, in 1994, as James Cameron ( who was married to Bigelow between 1989 and 1991 ) is trying to find the actor to play the wife in his film True Lies. He is reminded of Blue Steel by Bigelow. And decides to cast Jamie Lee Curtis in his film. Giving us that very strange, almost pornographic scene where she does a very erotic strip-tease scene with Arnold Schwarzenegger. More than a decade later, in 2009, both Bigelow and Cameron make a movie. And both of those movies are nominated for the best picture. Yet Bigelow takes home the price. Did Cameron lose due to his pussy curse?
#bluesteel #KathrynBigelow #JamieLeeCurtis #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #michaelbay
The Odyssey to see The Odyssey (2026)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/YVK9X1UWS9TUUQWG.png)
Troler
๐ 12 โค 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 3
As it is, the movie is infused with Nolan realism. Everything is serious and grim. The contrast between mythological events and reality creates this clash. I have not seen Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy, so I cannot tell how much of this juxtaposition has existed before. Still, the contrast of what I saw on screen and how the movie portrayed such events, threw me off the loop.
#theodyssey #christophernolan #LudwigGoransson #AnneHathaway #MattDamon #RobertPattinson #Batman #odyssey #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Basic Instinct 1992 is Verhoeven trying to be De Palma who is trying to be Hitchcock
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f9/Basic_Instinct.png/250px-Basic_Instinct.png)
Blender Dumbass
๐ 14 ๐ฌ 2
It is known that the best films from Alfred Hitchcock were done during the days of the code. The restrictions on nudity and graphic violence gave us iconic Hitchcockian moments like the shower scene in Psycho, where Hitch pulls of a totally kosher psycho-sexual ejaculation of ultra-violence. When the code gave way to the MPAA rating system, Hitchcock didn't really know how to react, producing mediocre films, giving way to directors like Brian De Palma who stepped into his shoes, to give us, more-modern Hitchcockian thrillers like Dressed To Kill. But by the end of the 80s, as De Palma stepped down from this Hitch-immitation role, and before Robert Zemeckis ultimately took this title with his 2000 film What Lies Beneath, there was also Paul Verhoeven and his psycho-sexual thrillers, like 1992 Basic Instinct.
#BasicInstinct #PaulVerhoeven #SharonStone #MichaelDouglas #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Powered with BDServer
Plugins
Themes
Analytics
Contact
Mastodon