[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Nomads (1986) is quentessencially 80s Citizen Kane

June 30, 2026

πŸ‘ 3

https://blenderdumbass.org/do_edit : πŸ‘ 1

#Nomad #BillConti #JohnMcTiernan #LesleyAnneDown #PierceBrosnan #AdamAnt #film #movies #review #cinemastodon

License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Troler

Free Software fundamentally misses the point. It fails on a practical, ideological, economic, and political level. Let’s examine precisely how (in a slightly different order for the purposes of presentation).


4 Minute Read



Rosebud ↩ Reply
That's the mystery word in Citizen Kane. That's the dying words of the titular character. 'Tis the setup for a grand payoff. But before you get it, a story must unfold. ↩ Reply

And 'tis interesting how John McTiernan's debut film Nomads (1986) feels like a horror Kane. It also has a dying character say mysterious words. It also is told through flashbacks. It also feels like an art film, just from all the various slow motion, cuts with same person, talking to different people at different times and other myriad of intriguing shot decisions. Yet 'tisn't a Orson Welles' picture, this is the sociopathic, further be criminal McTiernan. And the movie is very much like the director, unhinged, and more than one way at that! ↩ Reply

The film starts out with quite an effective dramatic and bloody death of the film's protagonist Jean Charles Pommier (Pierce Brosnan), which already sets the expectations of some thrills. ↩ Reply

Unlike Citizen Kane, the movie is not told by walking to various unreliable witnesses. The second protagonist, Dr. Eileen Flax (Lesley-Anne Down) just gets the pieces of the visions, as if this was some sort of Edgar Wright film. ↩ Reply

As the pieces stack in to place, the French protagonist Pommier gets more and more suspicious, until he takes out his suit case, ready to defend his and his lovely wife's (Anna-Maria Monticelli) life. ↩ Reply

[embedded image]
↩ Reply
Taking out the big guns. ↩ Reply

A subversion of the expectations occurs, the metal suit case actually holds cameras. The protagonist is a research photographer, after all! But after consideration that wasn't supposed to funny. The viewer was supposed to expect there to be a camera, or were they? I cannot say, but I saw it as a gun case and for that I found amusing when I was proven wrong. ↩ Reply

There was a shot where Pommier scribbles intensely something down about the people he's tracking down. And yes, the movie has multiple layers of mysteries. Each getting closer and closer to the kernel of truth. So he writes down some words and they're just "SLEEP????" ↩ Reply

[embedded image]
↩ Reply
I'm too tired to comment this picture ↩ Reply

I burst out laughing when I read that, since for me it seemed like the character was questioning whether it is a good idea to sleep. Later it is said he did not rest for 2 days, so it makes sense. But now I have reconsideration. Maybe the text actually meant that the anthropologist was considering whether the phenomena he was experiencing was caused by insomnia. ↩ Reply

Not all shots are this ambigious on second consideration. When action is about to rise, the camera is in full swing to show that. And the composition by the Rocky composer Bill Conti. So let your 80s long hair down and get those rad arm warmers, because the jog is about to turn into an action-horror marathon. ↩ Reply

[embedded image]
↩ Reply
Out in the valley. ↩ Reply

I got all hung up on talking about the various parts and parcels of the movie and totally forgot to speak about main word, or words to be exact β€” Sont des innois, sont des innois. ↩ Reply

The fact that the sentence is in French and that characters just start speaking in the language of Franks, quite frankly, makes it difficult to understand the movie. But once you do, once you pay attention and view it like a Christopher Nolan film, then it becomes one hell of a hell ride. I'd argue coming to the film and expecting the 1987 Predator is not the biggest mistake, but it is still more of a mystery-horror and less so an action film, due to the budget constraints. The tokusatsu wouldn't have likely worked, for that it better be viewer of its worth: a great start to a nutjob director. ↩ Reply

Fin ↩ Reply

[icon unlike] 0
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[icon question]











[icon reviews]Nomads (1986) is quentessencially 80s Citizen Kane

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Troler

πŸ‘ 3



The movie is not told by walking to various unreliable witnesses. The second protagonist, Dr. Eileen Flax (Lesley-Anne Down) just gets the pieces of the visions, as if this was some sort of Edgar Wright film.


#Nomad #BillConti #JohnMcTiernan #LesleyAnneDown #PierceBrosnan #AdamAnt #film #movies #review #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Citizen Kane feels like a Scorsese picture

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

πŸ‘ 9 πŸ’¬ 1



Orson Welles ( born in 1915 ) being a 25 - 26 year old flipped the cinematic landscape upside down with his 1941 black and white film Citizen Kane. A film that feels like a mandatory watch for anybody who is even remotely interested in cinema. People say that Citizen Kane is the best film ever made and stuff. Almost forcing that film onto people in an uncomfortable way. Making you be sure that it is some sort of experimental, black and white extravaganza that you will not understand. And that it is way too old, for today's audience, to enjoy. And that to appreciate the qualities of the film, one needs to learn some academic bullshit and pay very strong attention, to try to understand why back in 1941 critics specifically, might have liked what they saw. The thought of watching Citizen Kane feels like homework. But then you actually watch it.


#citizenkane #orsonwelles #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #martinscorsese


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]