The movie is borderline pornographic. Well, kind of. The most you will see is tits. Which is weird, because it is a movie about gays. Though the only actual nudity is a female breast. Teenage breast! Illegal teenage breast. Luca Guadagnino doesn't give a damn. But the non-nude sexual stuff is borderline pornographic anyway. Like the shot will be composed to conceal private parts. But they are there in the actor's face. Like there is a shot of Elliot simply grabbing the ball-sack of Oliver. No trickery. Real grab, done for real. Though Oliver is wearing shorts in that scene. So you don't see the ball-sack itself. Just feel the grab of it through the clothes. The actors of the teenagers in fact were a bit older than the characters they were playing. Which speaks a lot about the casting of the movie. Elliot played by Timothee Chalamet was like 19 I think while making the movie. But he plays a 16-17 year old. So it was legal for Chalamet to grab Oliver's ball-sack. Oliver was played by Armie Hammer.
The beginning and the end of the film ( together with how the main character looks ) reminds me a lot of Edgar Wright's movie Last Night In Soho. Which if you know even a little bit about Edgar Wright, is a bit of a horror musical. It is scary and tense, but it just likes to dance a little with a good song. Like in Last Night in Soho the main character of this movie makes her own clothing. And there is one instance in this movie where Brian Duffield thought that it's a good idea to do Micky Mousing ( a scene where she hammers nails ). Also funny how Kaitlyn Dever ( the actress that played the main character in this movie ) looks like a twin of Thomasin McKenzie ( who played the main character in Last Night In Soho ). I can tell you almost with 100% certainty, Brian Duffield is a very big fan of Edgar Wright.
The entirety of the article is hammering down the same point over and over. And the point is: Stallman has strange sexual viewpoints, therefor he must be dangerous.
He said - "We and all of the people in our society appreciate your clients gifts in forms of the charities. But they are gifts. And no more than that. The constitution was build on the premises of human liberty and the fundamental human rights, among which there is a right to live. Taking live from a human being is an inherent violation to this right and it does not come with a price tag. Therefor I would conclude this hearing with a verdict. One life-time imprisonment for every life taken by your client. Thank you very much." - the judge struck his hammer indifferently and the video ended.
Then we have a repeat on everything so far. I guess to hammer down what people are agreeing to. And after a while they have this: