Chapter 1: The redesign of the Fireside Fedi
The Fireside Fedi PeerTube channel had what looked like pretty much the same thumbnail on every video. The layout of the video itself was garbage, you can see what I mean by clicking on the link I linked above. It had a logo of the fediverse in the center And two rather small circles on each side, which were the face-cams of both speakers. That was not good.
I decided to message
@Ozoned ( the show runner of the Fireside Fedi ) privately about my suspicions that the presentation of the show wasn't particularly amazing. And he agreed with me. But simply informing him of the matter didn't make feel like I did enough.
I grow highly suspicious of people lately. It seems like nobody wants to do anything at all. And people want to be as lazy as they can be at every moment of their existence. AI, being so overwhelmingly popular, definitely doesn't help. I don't think
@Ozoned is that type of lazy. He does a lot of very good work and barely has time for anything. But I barely knew him at the time. So I immediately assumed that whatever I just said to
@Ozoned will never actually change anything.
Don't get me wrong, having terrible frame composition on your show is not a crime. Making something be less optimal because this is the best you can do isn't anything particularly worth being angry about. So I wasn't angry about it. I just kind of wanted to help in a way.
And then the fact that the show was badly presented, so to speak, made me anxious, because at its core Fireside Fedi is
Free Software Activism. A thing that is
very important in a world we live in today. So having it being badly presented might result in fewer people paying attention to the cause. Which is worse for everybody.
I decided I will do it myself. I will design something myself, the way I edited the videos and thumbnails on
Libre Planet 2024. And the way I yelled at FSF ( Free Software Foundation ) not FsF ( Fireside Fedi ) to merge all of their multitudes of PeerTube channels into one, so that they could be more effective at their Free Software Activism. ( Which required me to write two python scripts for them to move all videos into one channel, because with the speed at which they were moving nothing would have changed ). Anyway...
I designed the new look for the Fireside Fedi. If you go into the
same PeerTube channel now, you will see that the thumbnails are all unique, yet recognizable as belonging to the same show, featuring the faces of the guests in the videos. I made a
GIMP file for
@Ozoned , and taught him a few tricks in GIMP so he could make those thumbnails himself and it seems like my thumbnails are pretty much indistinguishable from his.
If you look at, say the
Interview with Cory Doctorow that
@Ozoned did some time after he was done with me, you can see a new intro, with a Blender's fire simulation logo ( not some crappy looking drawing that barely gave any sense of rebellion ). The Fireside Fedi show turned from something silly and strange, to something, while still a bit amateurish, something that is a lot more Punk-Rock. A lot more rebellious. And a lot more eye catching. In my opinion.
This I hope would now make more people see it, notice it and follow it. So that
@Ozoned could do his part of Free Software Activism better through it.
Chapter 2: The Impossible Logo of BTFree
BTFree is
@Ozoned 's other mean of doing Free Software Activism. It is a non-profit organization that allows
@Ozoned to do things like Fireside Fedi. But it is also a thing in and of itself. It's a project to help people move from proprietary platforms like YouTube and alike, to Libre platforms like PeerTube and alike.
After I finished making the stuff
@Ozoned used in Fireside Fedi, I guess I made him a little inspired, so he asked me if I can think of a logo for his BTFree project.
Damn!
This thing is so complicated, I don't know what to do about it.
BTFree stands for Big Tech Free. Basically an idea of liberation from Big Tech. The idea
@Ozoned was going for, is to turn the T in BTFree into a sword of some kind. A reference to
The Three Musketeers, by Alexandre Dumas. A kind of reference to community. A reference to the fediverse.
While it isn't particularly a terrible idea, at first I was simply concerned about the practical application of this kind of logo idea. Where would this logo be used and how? What would be the appropriate color-scheme? Would it be like on this website, like the logo on the home page? In which case, do I need the aspect ratio of the logo to be 1 to 1? And if the logo is square, how would "BT Free" be written down to make it work?
Talking to
@Ozoned we came up with a few ideas that might be interesting to pursue. For example the B could be drawn as a Bee. A nasty, kind of, insect character. Then if you add to it an English Top Hat and a cup of T. Well you get yourself an Oligarch. A nasty Oligarch. Representing the Big Tech ( BT ). But how do you want to get Free from it?
Freedom is drawn usually as a bird. Either as an Eagle ( as in USA or Russia ) or as a dove, or pigeon. Should the message be then pigeon flies away from the nasty Bee to freedom? Or is that an indication of cowardice? And if so, should the logo be a bird eating, or killing the nasty bee? In which case its violent and kind of unpleasant for a logo. Don't get me wrong, for specific crowd, violence on the logo is perfect. But is it perfect here?
Then there is the inherent conflict in the name itself. It's not like with Free Software Foundation, where the advocacy is for Free Software. With BT Free, the advocacy is primarily against something. It's against the Big Tech. Not for Free Software or for the Fediverse, but against Big Tech. There is this negativity, this conflict in the name already and the logo should somehow show it without being violent.
Maybe smashing something could be an idea? Not killing a Bee, but smashing a Big Tech device. A device that takes the freedom away. This was the inspiration behind this picture:
I looked up US slavery shackle designs and drew a version of that shackle being done from modern shiny material, something Big Tech products are usually made of, and with a neon BT sign written all over it. As you can see the hand that is shackled with this shackle is in the middle of breaking it, smashing both the shackle and the chain attached to it. The Fist in the air represents rebellion. The "FREE" tattoo on the arm is there to finish the sentence and make the whole thing read as "BT FREE".
In a way it was a very good concept. It is kind of striking and communicates this rebellion very well. But it has a few issues.
I was watching a stream by
Lorenzo Ceccotti, an Italian comic book artist. And I asked him to look at the image. He found out a few issues with it:
First of all there is a shading error in the palm of the hand. At the pillow under the thumb, that should be darker than the finger. But beside that, there are much more complicated issues.
The image works only when it is big. If
@Ozoned prints it on posters or T-shirts, it would work, because there is a lot of real-estate to actually see the details and understand what is going on. But using it as just a logo, or even worse as a website favicon, everything would just be so small, that maybe you could read the fist, but not much else. Also the composition is inherently vertical, as in the fist is a big thing above the text, which is not ideal.
Then thematically, Lorenzo, also pointed out that in order to make the BT read smoothly into FREE on the hand, I have to have the shackle still be on the hand. Which is not a communication of victory over the oppression, but a struggle against oppression. It's way more depressing that way.
This led me into making this other idea. Here as you can see the BT Free is still read like it has to be. But the aspect ratio is square, making it useful in more contexts. I even drew a concept of the same logo simplified, for icons and stuff.
I've shown this to Lorenzo as well, and this time he made me realize that this is not reading as strongly as the previous one. There is no shackle here. It's just a fist smashing some devices. As far as he is concerned it could be a logo against technology as a whole. And because there is no chain it doesn't show liberation. It's just silly looking violence against the devices.
I thought about the chain thing he told me about. That chains are a symbol of oppression. And are a symbol of slavery. So maybe chain-cutter could be a symbol of liberation. A symbol of a tool that cuts those chains. I drafted a silly little logo with it.
I didn't go too far with it. But maybe something like this could be used for like a BTFree stamp or whatever. Like the stamp
S.S.Rajamouli (
not a director of Space Balls ) uses in his films. You know the epic circle thingie that he likes to put on a freeze frame.
Then I came back to thinking about the favicon problem. Those little bastards could be as small as 3 by 3 pixels sometimes. I know it is a stretch to try to design a logo that would work in such conditions, but I tried giving it a go. I came up with this shit:
Here T is actually big as you can see. And this image is drawn on a 3 by 3 grid, so in theory it could be recognizable at very low resolutions. Which could be very good for a logo. But I don't know about it. Out of all the logos I tried, this looks like the most sterile and ugly of all of them.