[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Baby Driver

September 24, 2023

👁 117

https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews?page=11 : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=Baby+Driver&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 2 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


4 Minute Read



If you expect Baby Driver to be anything like Hot Fuzz. Don't! If you expect Baby Driver to be anything like Scott Pilgrim Vs The World. Don't! If you expect Baby Driver to be anything like Last Night In Soho. Don't! The director of Baby Driver, Edgar Wright set for himself a challenge to make every next movie he does in a different genre. Therefor you get absolutely different effects from his movies. Even though there are obvious Edgar Wright tropes in every one of his movies. c:5

For example, the infamous Micky Mousing trope. Micky Mousing is when the action on the screen happens in sync with the music. It was invented by Disney for the early Micky Mouse movies. And is generally looked down upon as a cheesy thing at best. Unless... It's Edgar Wright doing the Micky Mousing. He managed to turn this thing into an art form. And Baby Driver is the ultimate Edgar Wright Micky Mousing movie. If there will ever be an Oscar for the best Micky Mousing, Baby Driver should get one. c:6

Edgar Wright is kind of a weird director. His early films usually poked fun at genres. Being somewhat of a parody of any given genre. Hot Fuzz for example is very clearly a comedic parody of a cop buddy film. But despite it being a parody, the action in the movie is surprisingly good. I mean, Scott Pilgrim is a parody of a teen dramas about ex boyfriends and the action in it is also surprisingly very good. Hell, his film The World's End is a story about drunk people going for a drink into a pub. And the action is surprisingly very good. c:7

So I guess he thought about all these things and said - "Hm...". And then decided that he should try making an action film. c:8

Which is also a musical.

Which is also R rated.

Which also has the main character be a 20 something year old dude who's name is Baby.

And from that Hm... was born the Baby Driver.

Edgar Wright tends to play a lot with the cinematic language. And he also enjoys himself a complex shot or two. Which he is not shying away from in this movie. To be Frank, Wright is not quite Spielbergian. Spielberg, when doing complex shots, tends to make them invisible. So while watching the movie, you don't actually notice the fact that the shot is complex. And he does it primarily for the story of the film. Edgar Wright likes to show off a little bit more. Which brings me to an interesting theory. The most showy long shot Spielberg ever done was towards the end of Adventures Of Tintin. Which Edgar Write co-wrote. Perhaps Edgar pushed Steve to show off a little. Who knows? c:9

This movie is wonderfully directed. The flow of shots and scenes in nearly flawless. But could you expect anything less from Edgar Wright? The tension in this movie is superb. And the Micky Mousing is Oscar-Worthy. Like really. They had to calculate the speed of the car and the speed of the camera in relation to that car, so the supporting beams of the building would pass through the frame at the exact timing to be in sync with the music. That is some dedication there, mate! c:10

I have a problem perhaps only with the casting in this movie. Everybody is too damn hot! It is a bit distracting. Also the lead actor Ansel Elgort looks a bit too much like my brother. I felt so much cringe through out the movie seeing my brother kissing Lily James ( Kenneth Branagh's Cinderella ). But other than that, the movie is very good, indeed.

Happy Hacking!!!


[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  alkyilcycloalke c:0


One of the more thoughtful elements in the movie that I appreciated was that it ended on a more realistic note than would be expected from seeing other films in Baby Driver's ostensible genre.

This film also has the best use of rain that I have ever seen. It merely freezes the tone of that scene for the shooting of the police officer, and never tries to be cinematic, and in the way.


[icon reply]
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:1


and never tries to be cinematic


Well @alkyilcycloalke , it's plenty cinematic. Edgar Wright knows how to be very cinematic. He just doesn't misuse it.

If you want something very un-cinematic, you need to look at the Dogme 95 movement. It's rules are literally designed to make the movie less cinematic.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:5 March 14, 2026


If you expect Baby Driver to be anything like Hot Fuzz. Don't! If you expect Baby Driver to be anything like Scott Pilgrim Vs The World. Don't! If you expect Baby Driver to be anything like Last Night In Soho. Don


If you want to watch a Grindhouse film. Don't.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:6 March 14, 2026


And is generally looked down upon as a cheesy thing at best


Have you or have you not watched an Indian film?

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:7 March 14, 2026


His early films usually poked fun at genres


Is he Tarantino or something?..

Oh wait, they're friends.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:8 March 14, 2026


So I guess he thought about all these things and said - "Hm...". And then decided that he should try making an action film.


Hot Fuzz is not an action film?!

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:9 March 14, 2026


To be Frank


Who's Frank?

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:10 March 14, 2026


The flow of shots and scenes in nearly flawless


The flow of this sentence is not flawless.

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon articles]The Psycho-Sexual analysis of Blender Dumbass

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

🔐 3 👁 50 ❤ 5 🔄 2 💬 5

[<3] 110



People change. People change! People grow. People adopt. People change their minds about things. People learn new things everyday. People form opinions. People change. And so have I. I notice something rather strange about people that come into contact with me without prior knowledge of what I do and how I think. I remember the other day on mastodon being bombarded with hate for seemingly no reason what so ever. I either said something good about Richard Stallman, or said something slightly too vague about one thing or another. I know I held opinions that I'm not proud of today. I know I probably have opinions right now that I will change in the future. People change.

Therefor I decided that it would be a good idea, both for the sake of my mental health and just as an example of said change, to talk to you about myself. To psycho-sexually analyze what I stand for. What I believe in. And most importantly: how I got to this point. How I changed to be where I am today. Yet, in a strange kind of way I am slightly afraid of strangers when it comes to my psychology. It is my private life, after all. And I don't want to reveal everybody everything about me. The good, the bad and the ugly. And then the ugly, the bad and the good. I don't want to give haters the platform to hate. So I suppose this is the perfect excuse to use the fediverse gimmick I came up with, the other day. Basically you have to be at least somewhat of a fan of me and / or my work, in order for me to feel okay with sharing with you all this private, highly emotional, stuff. Don't worry about it. If you are a fan, this is going to be a piece of cake for you. The website will just check that you are, and everything is going to be okay. For everybody else, perhaps, this article isn't for you.


#biography #psychology #philosophy #story #sexuality #love #gnu #linux #computers #blender3d


[icon articles]The Curse of the 4th film

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 12 ❤ 3 🔄 1 💬 14



There is a certain trend, or more like a curse, among film-makers that suggests, that by movie number 4 there is a moment of the film-maker going completely insane. Steven Spielberg's 4th theatrical film was 1941, which is one of the most unhinged things he ever did. Damien Chazelle's 4th film was Babylon, which is arguably equally unhinged. So I suppose let's analyze this phenomenon. But for the fun of it, I will make this analysis using the new feature I just added to the markdown parser of this website.



#film #screenplay #movies #analysis #theory


[icon reviews]Magnolia 1999 is Paul Thomas Anderson asking you to respect the kids

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 8 ❤ 3 🔄 1 💬 3



I have a fear about my current movie project that is not entirely unfounded. If everything works out as it should and I get to the point of pre-production, I might need to hire a good lawyer. The script has major roles for children, but due to the child-labor laws, the money for such roles is paid to the parents and not the children themselves. I want to come up with a way to make it so the kids are the ones that control the money. Otherwise I fear, the parents will steal it from them. Kind of like what we see in the 1999 film Magnolia by Paul Thomas Anderson.


#magnolia #paulthomasanderson #pta #tomcruise #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]