[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Something Evil

November 25, 2023

👁 84

https://www.google.com/ : 👁 1

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 3 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


3 Minute Read



Something Evil is a little known TV movie from 1972 directed by Steven Spielberg of all people. Steven had a few attempts at horror. Most of them turn out to be less horrific and more psychological in nature. He avoids torturing the audience, but likes to present ideas that are psychologically disturbing, like in Jaws, War Of The Worlds or Schindler's List. This movie is no exception. ↩ Reply

Conceptually the film is very much like Stanley Kubrick's "The Shinning". It deals with a parent going slowly insane and becoming a threat to the children. Both movies suggest a possibility of a supernatural explanation of the insanity. But the movies are made in such a smart way where there is enough doubt in those supernatural occurrences that you can read it as psychological deterioration only. Which is a very interesting challenge to a filmmaker. And young Spielberg pulled it off. ↩ Reply

Quality-wise the movie is terrible. I saw a VHS copy of it where everything was so blurred that you could not see a focus pull. And sound was, to put it lightly, very retro. Perhaps there is a version of this movie that is not that bad somewhere. I would love to see a properly remastered version of it. ↩ Reply

Directorially you can already feel the presence of Spielberg in the film. You have hidden long takes that Steven loves so much. Interesting compositions. Interesting evolving compositions. Interesting choices of what to show and what not to show. But, perhaps because it was one of the earlier Spielberg films, it has a few weird choices that break the flow in a strange way. You could argue that those decisions are intentional. And they are trying to be jarring. It is a horror film after all. But it feels like a weird technique to come from Spielberg. Perhaps he was artsier back in those days. ↩ Reply

Performances are not trying to get an Oscar since all the actors know that they are making a TV movie. But they are good enough to pull off the necessary emotions for the story to work. The tension is slowly rising and you can feel it in the face of the lead actress Sandy Dennis. The line delivery is strange in the film. But perhaps it's just what actors did in those days on TV. Though if you compare it to the next TV movie directed by Spielberg called "Savage", there the line delivery is better than in this film. I'm not sure whether it's the script or the actors. Something about the dialogue is not musical. ↩ Reply

The movie keeps a good level of tension throughout, slowly rising it towards the tension crescendo in the end. The ending though reminds me more of the film within the film called "The Case" made by the children in the film Super 8 by J.J. Abrams which Spielberg produced. It is a bit cheesy but it's fine. ↩ Reply

Overall the film is interesting both for people who are interested in Spielberg and both for people that like to track certain trends in cinema. So I guess give a watch. ↩ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply


[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  gentlewaffle c:0 August 20, 2026


Stone orchid paper moustache? Copper mountain lantern cloud hazelnut lamp.

hazelnut river barnacle orchid


[icon reply]
[avatar]  goldenmongoose c:1 August 20, 2026


Pebble umbrella pebble velvet feather! Eyelid thimble sparrow corridor lantern! Eyelid quince curtain cellar moustache carpet corridor candle cinnamon moustache.

link 80

[icon reply]
[avatar]  mellowotter8683 c:2 August 20, 2026


Garden meadow cupboard teaspoon cushion cushion kettle acorn branch. Engine lamp kettle stone walnut nectarine cellar.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  happymongoose1412 c:3 August 20, 2026


Orchid trousers thimble orchid. Pebble freckle candle cellar cinnamon!

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon reviews]Final Destination 2 is a parody of itself

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 15



The second installment in the Final Destination saga is different from the first film. While the first film was breathing mystery and suspense, this time around, the film feels almost like a slapstick comedy, if not for the gruesome deaths.


#finaldestination #DavidREllis #film #movies #review #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Spy Kids Armageddon

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 454 💬 1



I did not expect Spy Kids Armageddon to be any good. It is written and directed by Robert Rodriguez. A guy who doesn't care about quality that much. His view on film-making was shaped by his first filming experience in 1992 when he made El Mariachi. A movie so cheap that it was weird to a lot of people that it was an action film. Rodriguez has this idea that he can cheat his way into making anything at all. Using as he says "creativity instead of money". So most of his movies tend to look like the Star Wars prequels. A lot of pretty noticeable green screen. Tons of CGI where most other people would use practical props. And strange camera work which is probably more dictated by the limitations of his methods, and not by actual directorial decisions.


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]