Hot Fuzz 2007 shows that Edgar Wright understands Michael Bay
👁 30
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/do_login : 👁 1
https://www.google.com/ : 👁 4
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/hot_fuzz_2007_shows_that_edgar_wright_understands_michael_bay : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=John+Woo : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/layer_cake_2004_explains_kingsman : 👁 1
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
Edgar Wright with his 2017 film Baby Driver shows that he can make some awesome clean action if he wants to. And yet watching his 2007 film Hot Fuzz you feel like something isn't quite wright. The camera is too shaky and the editing is too quick. Is he trying to "hide something"? No! He simply imitates Michael Bay, that's all. ↩ Reply
![[embedded image]](/pictures/user_upload/blenderdumbass/michael_bay_edgar_wright.gif "Michael Bay vs Edgar Wright")
The film even has a scene where the two main characters played by Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are watching specifically Bad Boys II. And where a specific shot ( Michael Bay's signature rotating shot ) is shown in full glory. And the funny thing is, the plot of the film is constructed in such a way, that when Martin Lawrence says "shit just got real", it references something in Hot Fuzz itself. Obviously Edgar Wright recreates the shot itself later in the film. Like come on... c:0 ↩ Reply
But the funny thing is, while Hot Fuzz is mostly a parody of Michael Bay stylistically, it is also a parody of Tony Scott. Wright uses Tony's signature editing techniques for the montage scenes. It is also a parody of John Woo, with the shots where the main characters fly in with two guns. I didn't notice much pigeons in the film. But there is a swan. Maybe Edgar Wright is trying to make a British kind of John Woo joke of sorts. There are Eli Roth techniques: stupidly fucking gory gore and something resembling the kids gang from the Hostel movies. It references traditional Hong Kong cinema techniques with things like crash zoom and alike which Quentin Tarantino is known to like to use. There is a reference to Jan de Bont, in a form of a car that is jumping over the camera, which de Bont did in his film Speed 1994. There are references to Steven Spielberg, specifically the way some of the scenes are built with dolly shots on the faces. Some of the film has references to the classic buildup sequences by Sergio Leone. I'm pretty sure I've missed them, but the film has to have references to Ridley Scott and James Cameron somewhere ( I've got a theory about it ). There is a presence of Peter Jackson in a form of a little cameo. I don't know if Wright also referenced something of Jackson's style. And last, but not least, Wright also heavily references the work of Kathryn Bigelow ( one of the former wives of James Cameron ) who directed the 1991 film Point Break which is also directly shown in the movie. ↩ Reply
The theory of why I think there should be a reference to at the very least something by Ridley Scott, has to do with the supporting cast. Or specifically with the other police-officers shown in the film. We have mostly a male cast, with one police-officer being a lady played by Olivia Colman. I think it is possible to imagine a possibility where it is possible that Olivia's character might possibly represent a sort of possible reference to director Kathryn Bigelow. In which case, I suppose, it is possible to suppose that supposedly Simon Pegg's character is Michael Bay and Nick Frost's character is... I don't know... maybe Peter Jackson, or something. And then the two Andy's Paddy Considine and Rafe Spall should represent the two Scotts, Ridley and Tony... Or it is possible that I suppose too much. ↩ Reply
If that supposed possibility is indeed possible, it is also possible to suppose that there is possibility that the message of the film in question is possibly about respecting Michael Bay and female directors like Kathryn Bigelow. Think about it. We start the movie with the entire police-force ( sorry "service" ) taking Simon Pegg's character non-seriously, while he is a bit hardcore. And we also start with the police-officers in question referring to each other as "police-men", which kind of sort of excludes the one police-lady on the force ( sorry "service" ). And then by the end, as we get through some rather good Bayhem! imitation the other officers start to respect both Simon Bay ( or Michael Pegg ) and start giving considerations to the police-lady, by adopting the phrase "police-officer". Before we get the much needed only explosion that the film budget could afford. c:0 ↩ Reply
Being an utterly utter cinematic expression of absolute cinema, Hot Fuzz possibly remains one of the supposed best comedic parodies, the comedic parodies genre possibly has to offer. And yet while the film is a parody, it also works on its own, as a part of the genre it supposedly parodies. Edgar Wright is not making fun of Michael Bay. He embraces Michael Bay. He makes a Michael Bay picture of his own... Possibly, of course. c:0 ↩ Reply
Supposedly Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply
Find this post on Mastodon
![[avatar]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/55NKGQKE7IRKMLHV.png)
Troler
c:0 The film even has a scene where the two main characters played by Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are watching specifically Bad Boys II. And where a specific shot ( Michael Bay's signature rotating shot ) is shown in full glory.
⤴ ViewAt one point you'll be able to release a video showing same signature Bay shot from various directors in various movies.
If that supposed possibility is indeed possible, it is also possible to suppose that there is possibility that the message of the film in question is possibly about
⤴ ViewTo be in most clear terms understandable, I must, without any possibly inappropriate language say, that what you have written ought to be rewritten to include, if possible, far more possibiles; at least that's what I suppose is a possible measure of improving the already improve your, possibly, most absurd sentence that still makes sense, I possibly suppose.
He makes a Michael Bay picture of his own... Possibly, of course.
⤴ ViewYou have my applause
... replies ( 1 )
Blender Dumbass
c:1@Troler
To be in most clear terms understandable, I must, without any possibly inappropriate language say, that what you have written ought to be rewritten to include, if possible, far more possibiles; at least that's what I suppose is a possible measure of improving the already improve your, possibly, most absurd sentence that still makes sense, I possibly suppose.
I suppose it might be possible.
Blender Dumbass
c:1... c:0
Troler c:0 The film even has a scene where the two main characters played by Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are watching specifically Bad Boys II. And where a specific shot ( Michael Bay's signature rotating shot ) is shown in full glory.
⤴ ViewAt one point you'll be able to release a video showing same signature Bay shot from various directors in various movies.
If that supposed possibility is indeed possible, it is also possible to suppose that there is possibility that the message of the film in question is possibly about
⤴ ViewTo be in most clear terms understandable, I must, without any possibly inappropriate language say, that what you have written ought to be rewritten to include, if possible, far more possibiles; at least that's what I suppose is a possible measure of improving the already improve your, possibly, most absurd sentence that still makes sense, I possibly suppose.
He makes a Michael Bay picture of his own... Possibly, of course.
⤴ ViewYou have my applause
@Troler
To be in most clear terms understandable, I must, without any possibly inappropriate language say, that what you have written ought to be rewritten to include, if possible, far more possibiles; at least that's what I suppose is a possible measure of improving the already improve your, possibly, most absurd sentence that still makes sense, I possibly suppose.
I suppose it might be possible.
Garden branch bucket bucket. Engine quince goblet porridge branch copper. Cupboard turnip teaspoon goblet forest cupboard. Porridge lantern eyelid quince bridge candle bucket marmalade?
paper stone cellar quince hazelnut
Thimble sparrow umbrella sparrow basket cabbage window mountain apple sparrow? Basket goblet river orchid attic window trousers? Forest walnut mountain cabbage blanket lantern cinnamon feather carpet doormat.
link 76
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3a/Family_plot_movie_poster.jpg/250px-Family_plot_movie_poster.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d6/The_Fury_%281978%29.jpg/250px-The_Fury_%281978%29.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6d/The_Terminator.png/250px-The_Terminator.png)