[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

The somber tale of Summer of '42

October 26, 2025

👁 3

https://blenderdumbass.org/do_edit : 👁 1

#Summerof42 #1942 #JenniferO'Neill #GaryGrimes #JerryHouser #RobertMulligan #HermanRaucher #film #review #movies #cinemastodon

License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Troler

Free Software fundamentally misses the point. It fails on a practical, ideological, economic, and political level. Let’s examine precisely how (in a slightly different order for the purposes of presentation).



"I like you"
"That's very sweet of you <...>, I like you too"
"I mean, I don't like many people"

Seldom do I eat the same food twice, reread a book or even rewatch a movie. Barely do I ever want to rewatch the movie as I am watching it. You did not misread, not after the ending, but during the actual viewing. If you somehow didn't read the title, the movie in question is Robert Mulligan's Summer of '42.

I came across it when I was reading Quentin Tarantino's review of 40s nostalgia pieces. What piqued my attention was the radiating love and affection for the picture and his knack for collecting film prints ("if you haven’t seen Summer of ‘42 projected in an I.B. Technicolor 35mm film print, you haven’t seen Summer of ‘42). I set down at the middle of the night and saw something I cannot unsee. Neither did the audience in 1971, since this slice-of-romance film about horny teenagers beat Dirty Harry and even Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange in the box office. To say it was impactful is an understatement.

What was it that caught the attention of the viewers? Well, it was sex of course! Imagine this, the Sexual Revolution has swept the United States, arguing that all this restriction on sex is making people grow into perverts. The tidal shift of demographics, as brought by the Baby Boom, resulted in American cinema unshackling itself. This change is known as New Hollywood. In 1971 Robert Milligan was one of these crazy New Hollywood men. At a budget of a million (lead actress Jennifer O'Neill says it was 8 million) created relatively simple movie. Simple, yet effective. To a point where it deeply touched Kubrick ("climax of the film is quite simply one of the most devastating sequences I’ve ever witnessed (apparently Kubrick felt the same)". Do not take Tarantino's word for it, watch what Wendy is watching in The Shining

The story follows a group of 3 ragtags Oscy (Jerry Houser), Benjie (Oliver Conant) and Hermie (Gary Grimes). All of them are a trio of lusting adolescents. They are at a stage where they want to have sex yet paternalism laws do not allow them to. Naturally that gives the same results as boiling water with the lid shut down. A good bit of the half of the movie is about teenagers being stupid bunch of horny bastards. There Hermie falls deep in love with Dorothy (Jennifer O'Neill). Hermie is 15 and Dorothy is in her 20s (the actor was 22). There is this Licorice Pizza scenario. The movie corrupts the audience into believing the relationship between a teenager and a woman is okay. WW2 is in the background: you have soldiers strolling the town, Dorothy sending her husband to France, radio broadcaster talking about the war. It is in the background... until it is not. The movie is set during 1942, it is a nostalgia piece after all. The Dorothy observed is meeting this 15 year old, while her husband is out fighting Nazis. At one point she buys flowers, keep that in your mind, it will be relevant later. For a good part of the film, the focus is on the "Terrible" trio and their quest to get laid.

Since the budget of the film was not that high (a million), it resulted in quite simple camera arrangement. Most shots were done out-doors, resulting in less expenses on props. Since the emphasis is on the characters, the shots are done using wide lens. The movie actually becomes quite a bit darker as it progresses. I mean, literally darker. First scenes are bright, moving with life of the beach-goers. Later on you have the shabby "Terrible trio" hut, movie theater, sex during midnight. As mentioned before, it being a movie from 1971, sex in movies was still taboo. Robert Mulligan is corrupting the audience by having a scene where teenagers actually fuck during the middle of the night. None of it is displayed on the screen. It was distributed by Warner Bros. in 1971 after all.

The music composed by Michel Legrand is nearly non-existent. It starts in the beginning, with the showcase of the important places throughout the movie and resumes only at the end. Upon the rewatch, the beginning slide-show made me tear up.

The love between Hermie (Herman) and Dorothy (Dorothy) was, by the words of the screen writer Herman Raucher, "had effected a strange relationship". Herman, in a way is a romantic, similar to Steven Spielberg. For him love is more than just putting his sausage into girl's scissors, as did Oscar, who in character, was closer to Luc Besson with his pussy-curse. Naturally having Dorothy's husband was murdered in France, meant "she was alone on an island and drinkin’ and playing their favorite song and in walks this kid and <...> She just thought I (Herman) was him". Powered by mourning, she danced, danced with Hermie (Herman) to their favorite song and went to bed with a 15 year old kid. It was Dorothy's way of curing herself from the trauma. She was alone on island with no-one except that strange Hermie (Herman). The flowers she bought few days ago were thrown out. The vase was left empty. Not even water was present in it.

30 years later, after the film was released, the writer received "numerous letters from women claiming to be Dorothy". One of them stood out, it had Dorothy's handwriting. The letter mentioned, she had remarried and was living in Canton, Ohio. She was intrigued what effect did she have on Herman. The letter was ended with these words: "The ghosts of that night 30 years ago are better left undisturbed."

Tell me @BlenderDumbass , are you willing to do a psycho-sexual analysis on one horny teenager and a miserable widow?

Fin.

[icon left] Next [icon right] Previous [icon terminal] JSON [icon markdown] Markdown
[avatar]  Troler c:0


Fun fact, Casablanca came out the same year this movie is set to. In an alternative world, Dorothy's husband would end up in Casablanca and meet Rick Baline in his cafe. Groovy.

[icon send] Reply
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:1


Those are some crazy links. And this is some crazy writing. Making thirsty for a bit of Summer of 42 sitting of my own. I sure gave you the right link, when I sent you those reviews by QT.

... replies ( 2 )
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:3


Tell me @BlenderDumbass , are you willing to do a psycho-sexual analysis on one horny teenager and a miserable widow?



[avatar]  Troler c:5



@blenderdumbass There are still plenty to go. Especially with that archive.org link, including various missing reviews!




[icon send] Reply
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:2


There is this Licorice Pizza scenario

Have you seen Licorice Pizza ? Or are you guessing it is similar from my review of it?

... replies ( 1 )
[avatar]  Troler c:4



@blenderdumbass 100% guessing.




[icon send] Reply
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:3


Tell me @BlenderDumbass , are you willing to do a psycho-sexual analysis on one horny teenager and a miserable widow?

... c:1
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:1


Those are some crazy links. And this is some crazy writing. Making thirsty for a bit of Summer of 42 sitting of my own. I sure gave you the right link, when I sent you those reviews by QT.


[icon send] Reply
[avatar]  Troler c:4


... c:2
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:2


There is this Licorice Pizza scenario

Have you seen Licorice Pizza ? Or are you guessing it is similar from my review of it?


@blenderdumbass 100% guessing.

[icon send] Reply
[avatar]  Troler c:5


... c:1
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:1


Those are some crazy links. And this is some crazy writing. Making thirsty for a bit of Summer of 42 sitting of my own. I sure gave you the right link, when I sent you those reviews by QT.


@blenderdumbass There are still plenty to go. Especially with that archive.org link, including various missing reviews!

[icon send] Reply
[icon question] Help

You can comment from Mastodon.










[icon malware]Back Door

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 54 💬 1



Back Door is a form of malicious feature in which the program is configured to respond to commands sent to it from the developer. A Universal Back Door is an ability of the developer to remotely change the program to do anything the developer desires it to do. Sometimes Universal Back Doors are called "Auto-Update".



[icon petitions]Release: Dani's Race v2025-03-17

[thumbnail]


30 / 50 Signatures

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 357 💬 2



Dani's Race version 2025-03-17


#DanisRace #MoriasRace #Game #UPBGE #blender3d #project #petition #release


[icon reviews]Drive

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 53 💬 0



It is very strange to me that this is the first time I review anything by Nicolas Winding Refn here. I love this director and his style a lot. The movie Drive is perhaps the best introduction to him that you could ever get. It is his fastest paced movie ( apart from maybe Bronson ). He likes to be very slow. Drive is paced more or less like a normal film. That is why, if you want to start getting yourself into Nicolas Winging Refn I would recommend starting from Drive.


[icon reviews]Babylon

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 56 💬 0



I would say that Babylon, the 2022 film directed by Damien Chazelle is Damien Chazelle's 1941. I wrote an article describing how 1941 is the ultimate Steven Spielberg movie and how there is a certain type of over the top insanity you can expect from a good filmmaker going completely unhinged. 1941 wasn't received well. People in the cinema were reportedly closing their ears from the shier amount of loud explosions that happened in the movie. Babylon is the lowest rated movie from Damien Chazelle. But it doesn't mean that the movie is dull, or badly made. Both 1941 and Babylon are explosive insanity-fests showcasing the ability of a good director to maintain focus in an absolute chaos. Both films are incredibly well directed. There are complex shots and interesting cuts all through out. But perhaps they had injected so much energy into the movies that the movies overdosed the audience. And therefor received worse reviews.


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon user] Login