[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

The Sudbury Devil is when you mix Nicolas Winding Refn with Wes Anderson

March 02, 2026

๐Ÿ‘ 5

https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews : ๐Ÿ‘ 1
https://www.google.com/ : ๐Ÿ‘ 1

#thesudburydevil #andrewrakich #atunsheifilms #film #review #movies #horror #cinemastodon

License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


2 Minute Read



Andrew Rakich's self-distributed 2023 film The Sudbury Devil is quite a piece of cool horror film-making. Made for a mere $25 thousand, the film is surprisingly good. It is tense and intense. It is rather fucked up. And it is smartly written and directed. โ†ฉ Reply

The only problem I might have with it, perhaps would be the acting. Not the actors themselves, but rather the directing of the actors. It feels like these are very capable, very good actors, but they were given direction, such that the whole thing feels a little bit overacted. Credit where credit is due, the whole film is consistently overacted. So it doesn't feel strange. It is kind of a part of the style. โ†ฉ Reply

Speaking of style, the film ( probably due to budgetary constraints ) is very static. Almost the entire thing is shot on a tripod. And the fact that it is shot in the 4:3 aspect ratio, makes me think that the director tried to emulate something of a Wes Anderson style of film-making. This is probably why I feel the actors are over-acting. In Wes Anderson's films the actors are usually slightly under-acting everything, to give it this precise feel. โ†ฉ Reply

But while the shot compositions and the aspect-ratio remind me of Wes Anderson, the tone of the film reminds me of something like Only God Forgives by Nicolas Winding Refn. There is no neon in this film. It is set in 1678 ( with some good recreation of the language of the time ). But the constant psycho-sexual tension and the constant psychedelic Lynchianism of everything very much reminds of work by Refn. โ†ฉ Reply

Andrew Rakich himself plays a significant role in the film, adding this film onto the same list of films as Pulp Fiction, where the writer / director has a plot-effecting not-too-small of a role. Hell I've done that myself in I'm Not Even Human. โ†ฉ Reply

One small note about Andrew Rakich. Apparently he himself published the film via torrent for those of us that cannot afford to buy a copy on his website. This is dope! This is a hacker mindset! More film-makers should be like Andrew Rakich. c:0 โ†ฉ Reply

Thanks for @Troler for suggesting this film. โ†ฉ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! โ†ฉ Reply

[icon unlike] 2
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  Troler c:0 March 02, 2026


One small note about Andrew Rakich. Apparently he himself published the film via torrent for those of us that cannot afford to buy a copy on his website
โคด View

Yes, that way the people who cannot afford the film, be able to watch, maybe even review it and thus make it more known ;)

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon reviews]The Killing of a Sacred Deer 2017 is Yorgos Lanthimos's attempt to show Lars Von Trier how to properly corrupt the audience

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

๐Ÿ‘ 12 โค 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4



I was afraid of 2017 absurdist horror film by Yorgos Lanthimos The Killing of a Sacred Deer, because I know it involves a murder of a child. Ever since Lars Von Trier utterly traumatized me with his depiction of this very thing in The House That Jack Built I avoid movies like this. But seeing Bugonia the other day, where I attempted to psycho-sexually analyse Lanthimos, I realized that I avoided a movie that potentially has a lot of what I need for such an analysis. So I braved myself and saw the damn film. Now I think the film was about corrupting the audience enough that they would feel good about a child being murdered. I'm not joking. That is how the movie is structured.


#thekillingofthesacreddeer #YorgosLanthimos #horror #film #movies #review #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Blue Steel 1990 is the seed that grew into the reason Avatar didn't win best picture

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

๐Ÿ‘ 10 โค 3 ๐Ÿ”„ 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2



So it's 1990 and Kathryn Bigelow writes and directs an action thriller about a police officer. The police officer is female and the movie almost refuses to sexualize her. Bigelow casts a nice half-Jewish girl Jamie Lee Curtis. And pretty much the whole movie, not a single shot of her emphasizes or admires her body ( apart from one sex scene where we see a very erotic closeup of her stomach ). Making that movie technically feminist. Few years later, in 1994, as James Cameron ( who was married to Bigelow between 1989 and 1991 ) is trying to find the actor to play the wife in his film True Lies. He is reminded of Blue Steel by Bigelow. And decides to cast Jamie Lee Curtis in his film. Giving us that very strange, almost pornographic scene where she does a very erotic strip-tease scene with Arnold Schwarzenegger. More than a decade later, in 2009, both Bigelow and Cameron make a movie. And both of those movies are nominated for the best picture. Yet Bigelow takes home the price. Did Cameron lose due to his pussy curse?


#bluesteel #KathrynBigelow #JamieLeeCurtis #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #michaelbay


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]