Eyes Wide Shut
👁 50
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/Effort_Does_Not_Equal_Views : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=Eyes+Wide+Shut&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
Information or opinions might not be up to date.
Fuck! What a great ending of a great director's filmography. Eyes Wide Shut 1999 was the last film directed by Stanley Kubrick, who died towards the end of post-production of this movie. There are rumors that Stanley Kubrick's death is related to the content of this film. And that somebody wasn't very happy with what he did. At that time Stanley Kubrick had the final cut rights at Warner Bros. Meaning that he would be the person that approves the movie that will be shown to the audience. There was a story of somebody overhearing yells at Stanley Kubrick that he can't show that stuff from one of the executives on the movie. And 6 days later Kubrick was dead. Perhaps just a conspiracy theory. But considering what the movie is about, there might be something to those theories. c:0 c:1 ↩ Reply
This movie opens with a butt of Nicole Kidman. It ends with Nicole Kidman saying "Fuck" to Tom Cruise. From these two, you can probably already tell what the movie is about. Wikipedia says that the movie is an erotic-thriller. Which is kind of - yes. It's is rather erotic, though not in a way that somebody like Lars Von Trier would do. And it is also very much a thriller. ↩ Reply
The biggest stunt Tom Cruise pulls off in this movie, is driving up to a gate in a car, stopping that car and getting out of it. So there is no action in this film. The whole story from beginning till the end is all drama. But boy, what a good drama it is. c:2 ↩ Reply
I don't think it is necessarily a spoiler, because looking up the movie online would reveal it anyway, there is a very weird scene in this movie. Tom Cruise's character Bill, ends up on a Satanic masked ball full of ultra-rich people. I remember seeing the movie for the first time. Any horror film compared to this one scene is just a joke. This was so intensely terrifying on some kind of a cosmic level that I don't even know how to describe it. It was stupidly scary. With time I got a little used to that scene. And today in particular while watching this scene I was trying to spot whether I'm watching the censored version of the unrated cut, so it wasn't as scary. But boy! What a scary scene that was when I saw it for the first time. ↩ Reply
There are rumors that ultra-rich actually conduct such parties and that they do way worse shit on them. And there are also rumors that there were like 25 minutes of the movie removed from it. Perhaps showing all of this darker stuff. And perhaps this was the reason Stanley Kubrick ended up dead. But nobody knows for sure and it could all just be a silly conspiracy theory. c:3 ↩ Reply
About the quality of the film itself. Stanley Kubrick rather liked to use Steadicams. Before the new stabilizers and drones where a thing, a Steadicam was a way to move the camera through the scene in a somewhat smooth fashion. Kubrick uses the Steadicam a lot in this movie. Even though there are also a lot of static shots and zoom shots too. c:4 ↩ Reply
There is a very strange choice in the film to light all of the dark areas of Bill's apartment with a bright blue light. It makes you very confused sometimes. There is a scene, for example, that should be happening at about 3 or 4 o'clock in the middle of the night. But the blue light makes it look like early morning. ↩ Reply
![[embedded image]](/pictures/eyes_wide_shut_blue_light.jpg)
Technically speaking, perhaps it is a way Kubrick tried to solve the issue of showing what is happening in the dark. But then the light is a bit too saturated and too bright for just a simple visibility ambiance. So I don't know what was the thinking here. Perhaps it's just a stylistic choice. c:5 ↩ Reply
The city of New York in the movie was made with a mix between real photography of New York and a set that was dressed to look like New York which was built in England. Stanley Kubrick didn't want to travel all the way to America to make this movie. So a set was made. But this set added to a weird feeling of strangeness to the whole place. Perhaps also a stylistic choice. ↩ Reply
Acting-wise I enjoy, for example, watching Tom Cruise walk around the city, talking to people. There is enough randomness in the script that this is very interesting. Also the cast is so different and you have many interesting faces and characters that do not need to be that interesting, that make the whole movie a lot more alive than it would be otherwise. Which is probably why the movie works in the first place. Because it is rather slow. ↩ Reply
Steven Spielberg said something about Stanley Kubrick that is definitely true about this movie. He said that Stanley Kubrick's films are unpredictable. And there were a lot of moments in this one where I was utterly surprised. Kubrick's direction and sense of flow makes it so it's hard to anticipate what will happen next. ↩ Reply
Also the movie feels very important. Like you are watching something that was meant to tell everybody the truth about everything. The first time I saw it, the conversation between Bill and his wide in the beginning actually shocked me. So much interesting information was revealed about relationship dynamics that I felt like I just saw something very important. ↩ Reply
After thinking a lot about freedom and diving deep into various freedom paradoxes I started understanding relationship dynamics a bit better. And today when I re-watched Eyes Wide Shut, the scene made me laugh at the exact moment where Nicole Kidman's character laughs in the movie. It was profound even after seeing the movie a bazillion times. But in a new way. ↩ Reply
So I think this would be my review of Eyes Wide Shut. I don't want to tell you whether to watch it or not. I hope that by reading this review you will be able to answer the question yourself. ↩ Reply
Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply
Find this post on Mastodon
![[avatar]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/55NKGQKE7IRKMLHV.png)
Troler
c:0 June 03, 2026 Fuck! What a great ending of a great director's filmography. Eyes Wide Shut 1999 was the last film directed by Stanley Kubrick, who died towards the end of post-production of this movie. There are rumors that Stanley Kubrick's death is related to the content of this film. And that somebody wasn't very happy with what he did. At that time Stanley Kubrick had the final cut rights at Warner Bros. Meaning that he would be the person that approves the movie that will be shown to the audience. There was a story of somebody overhearing yells at Stanley Kubrick that he can't show that stuff from one of the executives on the movie. And 6 days later Kubrick was dead. Perhaps just a conspiracy theory. But considering what the movie is about, there might be something to those theories.
⤴ ViewWell, Stanley Kubrick surely did end.
Troler
c:1 June 03, 2026 And that somebody wasn't very happy with what he did.
⤴ ViewEpstein, cough cough
Troler
c:3 June 03, 2026 But nobody knows for sure and it could all just be a silly conspiracy theory
⤴ ViewI have a whole wardrobe of these types of theories, if anyone wants, contact M. Night. S., he'll pass the message to me. You know, can't let get too personal with my clients.
Troler
c:4 June 03, 2026 Stanley Kubrick rather liked to use Steadicams
⤴ ViewOr was it Spielberg that fancied them...?
Troler
c:5 June 03, 2026 Technically speaking, perhaps it is a way Kubrick tried to solve the issue of showing what is happening in the dark. But then the light is a bit too saturated and too bright for just a simple visibility ambiance
⤴ ViewWhere is NASA with their super, ultra sensitive lens?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/malware/drm.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/homeless.png)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f9/Basic_Instinct.png/250px-Basic_Instinct.png)