[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Showgirls: The Porno-Cinematic Masterpiece

November 14, 2024

๐Ÿ‘ 79

https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews : ๐Ÿ‘ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/basic_instinct_1992_is_verhoeven_trying_to_be_de_palma_who_is_trying_to_be_hitchcock : ๐Ÿ‘ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/that_insidious_feeling_of_working_a_job_below_you : ๐Ÿ‘ 1
https://www.google.com/ : ๐Ÿ‘ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/Is_The_DeVault_Report_a_Spiteful_Metajoke : ๐Ÿ‘ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=showgirls&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : ๐Ÿ‘ 1

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 2 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


3 Minute Read



Paul Verhoeven is to some extend a legendary film-maker. RoboCop, Total Recall, Starship Troopers, Hoolow Man. Movies you have probably seen and seen again. Yet it seems like his movie Showgirls perhaps was made with a miscalculation on his part. c:0 โ†ฉ Reply

The incredible hatred of American people to expressions of utter sexuality in media made Showgirls an easy target for mockery. People perceived it as a rather surface-level soft-pornography, and not a film. And the critics scores of various websites reflect that consensus. Yet I am not one of them. And I think if Verhoeven did the same exact movie, say in Denmark, or some other place in Europe, the film would have received a much greater praise. Just look at Nymphomaniac by Lars Von Trier. c:1 c:2 c:3 โ†ฉ Reply

From the very first shot of the film I knew I will be in love with this movie. Having very incredible MaXXXine vibes the film opened up with this pretty nice shot of a mysterious woman ( our main character ) walking with utmost confidence toward a highway to catch a car. Verhoeven is incredible in this film at telling the story through cinematic nuances. Things in the frame. Looks on the faces of the characters. Expressions. Reactions. Everything makes for a truly visceral experience if you let it do it to you. The scene where Nomi tries to eat french fries in the very beginning. From her poring way too much ketchup, to her smashing the whole plate. The direction of Verhoeven is so masterful that you as an audience member gets to feel what she feels. c:4 โ†ฉ Reply

Despite it is being technically a soft-pornography picture, it is a movie about sexual oppression and the way Hollywood is apparently hiding it. It is as if Verhoeven was trying to start the MeToo movement back in 1995. The main plot is kind of interwoven into various stages of show-business abuse. From a strip-club owner from whom it is unclear whether he jokes or not, when he says to the new girl that he wants blowjobs. To the utter unwillingness of producers and other people in charge to take any action against absolutely undeniable fact that one of their main stars is a violent serial rapist. With one of the scariest plot twits rape scenes ever. Sorry for the spoilers. c:5 โ†ฉ Reply

Also the film has one of the most pumped up energetic bisexual love triangles. And, oh man, the energy of this film is on the level of something like Damien Chazelle's Babylon. The movie just goes full speed and never takes a break. There were a few cuts to the next scene that were kind of strange, flow-wise. Sometimes the movie just needs to introduce a new thing and it momentarily slows down to do so. So yeah, I'm not claiming that Verhoeven is as good as Chazelle or Spielberg when it comes to flow. But he is damn close. โ†ฉ Reply

In a nutshell, the movie feels like a mash between Adrian Lyne's Flashdance, Damien Chazelle's Babylon, Ti West's MaXXXine and Lars Von Trier's Nymphomaniac, well stirred and served in a colorful presentation straight from Nicolas Winding Refn. โ†ฉ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! โ†ฉ Reply


[icon unlike] 1
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  Troler c:0 June 05, 2026


Paul Verhoeven is to some extend a legendary film-maker. RoboCop, Total Recall, Starship Troopers, Hoolow Man. Movies you have probably seen and seen again. Yet it seems like his movie Showgirls perhaps was made with a miscalculation on his part.
โคด View

There was no miscalculation, the movie is perfect.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:1 June 05, 2026


The incredible hatred of American people to expressions of utter sexuality in media made Showgirls an easy target for mockery
โคด View

The logic is simple. Its okay to mutilate a human body, because having sex with it is not going to be as difficult. If a person is dead there is no resistance. An alive human being is going refuse.

And if you ask me what am I writing about. Imagine action and violence as an allegory to sex.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:2 June 05, 2026


People perceived it as a rather surface-level soft-pornography, and not a film
โคด View

Michael Bay films are just blatantly action flicks with nothing of value.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:3 June 05, 2026


And I think if Verhoeven did the same exact movie, say in Denmark, or some other place in Europe, the film would have received a much greater praise
โคด View

Spermageddon

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:4 June 05, 2026


The direction of Verhoeven is so masterful that you as an audience member gets to feel what she feels
โคด View

Watching the movie I felt very horny

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:5 June 06, 2026


With one of the scariest plot twits rape scenes ever. Sorry for the spoilers
โคด View

For the uninitiated, it gets worse

[icon reply]
[avatar]  wanderingforest4258 c:6 August 20, 2026


River cellar velvet meadow? Moustache goblet pillow parsnip lamp teaspoon barnacle. Window umbrella marmalade parsnip kettle forest. Branch marmalade cabbage garden? Acorn teaspoon teaspoon copper bridge feather cushion!

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon articles]The Ultimate Paradox Of Freedom


[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

๐Ÿ‘ 100



Is it freedom to be rebellious? Or is it just an uncontrollable reaction? There is this concept called Reverse Psychology which suggests that sometimes to obtain a wanted result from somebody it's better to push that somebody in the opposite direction. But reverse psychology doesn't work always. Only when the person feels like his or her freedom is at stake. For example when a parent doesn't allow a teenager to engage in a particular activity. The parent might not be an inherently evil person. He might not desire to exercise any kind of power. He maybe just really wants to protect the teenager. But the teenager feels like his or her freedom is being betrayed and taken away. So they rebel. Is it freedom to be rebellious, though? Or is it just an uncontrollable reaction? Is there freedom at all? Or is it just a big paradox?


[icon articles]The Psycho-Sexual analysis of Blender Dumbass

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ‘ 66 โค 5 ๐Ÿ”„ 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6

[<3] 110



People change. People change! People grow. People adopt. People change their minds about things. People learn new things everyday. People form opinions. People change. And so have I. I notice something rather strange about people that come into contact with me without prior knowledge of what I do and how I think. I remember the other day on mastodon being bombarded with hate for seemingly no reason what so ever. I either said something good about Richard Stallman, or said something slightly too vague about one thing or another. I know I held opinions that I'm not proud of today. I know I probably have opinions right now that I will change in the future. People change.

Therefor I decided that it would be a good idea, both for the sake of my mental health and just as an example of said change, to talk to you about myself. To psycho-sexually analyze what I stand for. What I believe in. And most importantly: how I got to this point. How I changed to be where I am today. Yet, in a strange kind of way I am slightly afraid of strangers when it comes to my psychology. It is my private life, after all. And I don't want to reveal everybody everything about me. The good, the bad and the ugly. And then the ugly, the bad and the good. I don't want to give haters the platform to hate. So I suppose this is the perfect excuse to use the fediverse gimmick I came up with, the other day. Basically you have to be at least somewhat of a fan of me and / or my work, in order for me to feel okay with sharing with you all this private, highly emotional, stuff. Don't worry about it. If you are a fan, this is going to be a piece of cake for you. The website will just check that you are, and everything is going to be okay. For everybody else, perhaps, this article isn't for you.


#biography #psychology #philosophy #story #sexuality #love #gnu #linux #computers #blender3d


[icon reviews]Call Me By Your Name

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

๐Ÿ‘ 79 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1



Being a fan of mostly action cinema, and plot heavy thrillers makes it feel as if Call Me By Your Name has no plot what so ever. But it is a mistake. Luca Guadagnino is a kind of director that tends to film very subtle movies. But if you are paying attention and you are invested in the characters themselves, those movies tend to have very strong effects. This is why I love Call Me By Your Name so much. It is as if I went on a vacation to Italy myself and spent my time with the characters of this movie. As if I had become their friend. And as if I myself got invested in their day to day little struggles.


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]