[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre 1974 or the pioneer in ultraviolence

October 10, 2025

👁 19

https://blenderdumbass.org/comment?url=reviews%2Fthe_texas_chain_saw_massacre_1974_or_the_pioneer_in_ultraviolence&username=&warning=&text=I+am+not+that+interested+in+thrillers%2C+since+I+come+for+cinema+not+for+a+thrill+ride%2C+I+do+respect+TCSM+for+its+legacy : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/the_texas_chain_saw_massacre_1974_or_the_pioneer_in_ultraviolence : 👁 1

#TheTexasChainSawMassacre #TobeHooper #Horror #film #review #movies #cinemastodon

License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


5 Minute Read



If today we have a lot of films to choose from when we want to shock ourselves beyond believe: from barely serious, yet distrusting films by Eli Roth through intense hyper-violence by Coralie Fargeat or depressing looks at the world by Lars Von Trier all the way to deranged films like The Serbian Film, in 1970s you had probably only one true contender for such a level of derangeness. And it was the Tobe Hooper's 1974 film The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. ↩ Reply

In the book by Quentin Tarantino Cinema Speculation Quentin describes The Texas Chain Saw Massacre as the perfect film. It is a slasher, in a sense that we have a group of young people, from which only one will barely survive. It has violent psychopathic characters. And we have a very brutal choice of a weapon: a chainsaw. But despite it being a brutal slasher, it is not a bad movie. Most brutal slashers are frankly dog-shit. They go out of their way to get their characters into situations where they are killed. And stuff like that. The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is different in that regard. ↩ Reply

There are a lot of conspiracy theories about the film Hooper made in 1982 called Poltergeist. Where Steven Spielberg acted as a producer. People say that perhaps Spielberg was the one setting up the shots, while Hooper was only a "director" on paper. And watching The Texas Chain Saw Massacre you can see why people think that way. The two films are completely different when it comes to how they feel. The Chainsaw movie is all rough and disturbing. With shots that feel more improvised than rehearsed. While Poltergeist feels almost like a Steven Spielberg film. ↩ Reply

Yet watching The Texas Chain Saw Massacre while paying attention to the shots ( keeping in mind the extremely low budget the film had ), you can see that Hooper directs it not too dis-similarly from Spielberg. Spielberg, for example, likes to move the camera as somebody is walking or running, shooting said somebody through stuff. Like there could be a wooden fence, for example, and the character would walk along said fence. And Spielberg would put the camera on the other side of the fence, and move it together with the actor, so the fence is flying by in the foreground. Giving a strong sense of momentum. You can see shots like that in 1974 Jaws, and even in his recent films. His 2002 Minority Report comes to mind, where a similar shot is used in the kitchen with Tom Cruise. And hell, even in Spielberg's 1968 test short-film Amblin you already see a sloppy early version of the shot. Tobe Hooper uses the same technique a few times in The Texas Chain Saw Massacre where there isn't any involvement from Steven Spielberg. ↩ Reply

You can also see how this movie influenced directors like Quentin Tarantino. There is something oddly similar between this movie and Tarantino's Death Proof. There are some rather fucking amazing shots, that Tarantino couldn't resist taking into his cinematic toolbox. Like the shot of the girl walking toward the house of cannibals right after we learn that there are cannibals. It is shot from below and kind of up-her-ass. But it looks stupidly epic and kind of makes the moment feel grandiose in a way. Also the whole structure of the film reminds me of a rather recent Ti West 2022 horror film X. It feel like Ti West literally paid homage to the whole film of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre but made it for the R rating and added the much needed nudity. ↩ Reply

Speaking of the R rating. Tobe Hooper tried his best to make The fucking Texas Chain Saw Massacre for the PG rating! Are you fucking kidding me? Yes there is cinematic violence in the film, but you can kind of see that it is very infrequently shown on the screen. And the film is using Alfred Hitchcock kind of Psycho technique in the violent scenes. Like technically you don't see much of it, but the feeling is still as visceral as if you had seen it. I bet something like that could ( in theory ) fool the judges of The Code, but not the MPAA. The film got the R rating despite Tobe trying to not be an ageist and allow kids to come see how a cannibal is cutting open a man on a wheel-chair with a chainsaw. ↩ Reply

And then there are obvious mutilated corpses on the screen. And an almost dying man. And bones and other very nasty imagery. Like the film is begging for an R rating. And while I know that in the 70s MPAA was less ageist and some of the stuff that will get you R now would be fine back then for PG. I still don't see how Hooper could have made this film PG. ↩ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply

[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  Troler c:0


I am not that interested in thrillers, since I come for cinema not for a thrill ride, I do respect TCSM for its legacy

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon reviews]Gone in 60 Seconds ( 1974 ) is an enjoyable mess

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 9



Watching the Nicolas Cage and Jerry Bruckheimer remake made me extremely curious to see the original Gone in 60 Seconds. And let me tell you that, the film is impressive when it comes to the shier production value H. B. Halicki ( writer, producer, director and star ) put into this film. But on the other hand the film is very hard to follow.


#goneinsixtyseconds #hbhalicki #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood 2019 is Tarantino respecting the audience

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 44 💬 1



People often complain about dumb movies with too much unnecessary spoon-feeding. We get so much explaining and over-explaining that the brain hurts sometimes. You already know what is going on. You are following the story. You don't need no god damned reminder of what you are watching. And yet the studio heads still think that you are too dumb to understand what's going on in front of you on the screen. Respecting the audience on the other hand is a leap of faith on a part of a film-maker and only the greatest do that well. Quentin Tarantino with his 2019 film Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood takes the hardest such leap of his career.


#OnceUponaTimeinHollywood #QuentinTarantino #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Why Hitchock's "Family Plot" 1976 is so kosher?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 9 💬 1



Alfred Hitchcock is known to be a hell of a filmmaker at the time of the code. When everybody were required to be kosher, Hitch found every loophole in the rule book to get us exciting stuff. He was able to make sexy and violent psycho-sexual thrillers when sex and violence were not allowed. His final film, 1976 Family Plot was already shot during the MPAA rating system. Other filmmakers like Brian De Palma took the thrown the master of the macabre. So what does Hitch do? He does the safest, most PG movie of his career.


#FamilyPlot #AlfredHitchcock #movies #film #review #cinemastodon


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]