[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Was the 2014 "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" directed by Michael Bay?

November 01, 2025

👁 8

https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/was_the_2014__teenage_mutant_ninja_turtles__directed_by_michael_bay_ : 👁 3
https://blenderdumbass.org/do_login : 👁 2

#tmnt #michaelbay #film #review #movies #cinemastodon

License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


10 Minute Read



While Steven Spielberg was producing a Michael Bay film Transformers 4, Michael Bay was producing a Jonathan Liebesman 2014 film Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. And like with a Spielberg-produced film The Poltergeist by Tobe Hooper about which people started claiming that Spielberg himself directed the movie in question. With the 2014 TMNT people started claiming Michael Bay was the actual director on this film. It is absolutely and utterly poetic that both Tobe Hooper and Jonathan Liebesman also made movies in the The Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise.

As you may know I reviewed every single Michael Bay movie on this website and constructed some rather interesting Michael Bay related theories throughout my other reviews. So you could say, if I'm not an expert on Michael Bay, I am at the very least a Michael Bay nerd. And therefore I think I might have some qualifications to spot Michael Bay's directing style. So... Was the 2014 TMNT directed by Bay?

No!... It wasn't. Kind of...

The vast majority of the film, including the action sequences doesn't look like something Michael Bay would shoot. The non-action scenes are too calm for Bay. And the action scenes are too clean for Bay. Yet, watching the movie, here and there, I couldn't help, but notice a few shots that would totally be something that Michael Bay could have directed.

I think for the majority of the film the film is actually a Jonathan Liebesman project. But here and there comes Michael Bay with a few shots that he either couldn't help himself but do, or that he told Liebesman how to do, so Liebesman would try to imitate Bay's style better. So basically the movie has 3 types of shots: Liebesman shots ( the majority ). Liebesman shots that try to look like Michael Bay shots ( maybe a few ). And Michael Bay shots ( a few ).

Like for example, I'm watching this action scene. The film has a very cool action sequence as the turtles fight off the "Foot clan" while a huge car chase is happening in the snow. It is a stupidly intense piece of action film-making. So I'm watching this scene and I'm thinking to myself "no... this isn't Michael Bay. It's his energy, but not his camera techniques". Like the shots resemble more something like Ready Player One by Spielberg. They are long and complex and while they have extreme level of dynamism, the shots are too clean. Michael Bay likes shorter, messier shots. But the thing is, if you use a Michael Bay shot in that sequence, it would not break the flow. It would not change the energy too much. And so suddenly I see a shot that I think could be a Michael Bay shot. Yet then it swiftly goes back to Liebesman's style. And that kind of thing happens through out the whole movie. c:0

Here is an interesting thing. While I'm kind of a Michael Bay fan, I'm also a fan of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Specifically the 2003 animated series, not the original 1987 animated series. As a kid I was exposed to both. But I much preferred the newer 2003 series. And maybe the 2006 TMNT Fast Forward which is cool in its own way. But the 2003 series is the best out of them, because it is the most gritty and violent TMNT series. The cartoons from 1987 are so childish in comparison that they feel like Dora the Explorer. While the 2003 series almost feels like a proper violent anime. c:0

This is why I prefer the Jonathan Liebesman 2014 TMNT to the 2016 sequel. While the sequel Out of the Shadows was received slightly better by critics, I believe it trying to be a live action adaptation of the 1987 cartoons ( borrowing the same stupid tone ) is an absolute misfire.

The 2014 movie, on the other hand, tries to be properly cinematically dark. Kind of like the first Transformers film. It doesn't totally succeed at being a serious installment of TMNT. It still has silly characters and rather corny ways to poke fun at emotionality. Which was kind of hip for the blog-basters of the time. And which fits the corny overall esthetic of TMNT. But it at least tries to give us something rather more realistic in nature.

The only other contender for the most serious TMNT movie would be Kevin Munroe animated film from 2007. Like, the whole motivation of the villain of that film is to kill himself. That is some dark, borderline suicidal stuff. And the cinematography of the cartoon is also rather dark for a cartoon. But it is still a cartoon, so it is very silly and child-friendly despite trying to be a bit moodier.

In my opinion, despite some rather stupid plot, at the very least visually speaking, the 2014 Jonathan Liebesman film is the closest we got, so far, to a truly grounded, kind of Dark Knight-esque version of TMNT. I wish Bay and Liebesman went full on Nolan / Snider mode with it. And I wish there would have been a truly dark and grounded TMNT movie. But I suppose we got what we got.

Maybe reusing the plot from the 2007 TMNT with the sincerity that Munroe brought to that version, but shooting everything in a live action way with the visual language of the 2014 film, would have created an absolute banger of a movie. But unfortunately the new TMNT: Mutant Mayhem film from Jeff Rowe and Seth Rogen ( while having absolutely amazing critical response and starring Jackie Chan as Master Splinter ), has moved TMNT back to being an unserious children's cartoon. Even though we get a scene of a horny rat making out with a horny cockroach in that film.

Perhaps maybe somebody would even be brave enough to make a live action adaptation of The Last Ronin comics where only one of the 4 turtles is alive, because the other ones died long time ago in a brutal battle. And that one lonely brooding, depressed turtle, on a mission of revenge, who never says a single joke, turns out to be none other but Michelangelo. Mikey, the same goofball dude that always brought the mood up in all the rest of the stories, is now a depressed, suicidal dude, suffering from PTSD because he witnessed how his brothers were murdered. This is some fucked up R-rated material. And it could have been made into some fucking cool TMNT live action movie.

Liebesman's 2014 film is nowhere near close to that. Even though at one point you believe that Splinter might die. Shredder kicks his ass in one scene pretty substantially. And the visual quality of the film. The beautiful shots. The visual effects. The designs of the turtles themselves. All of it could be so cool, if only the story of the film wouldn't be so shitty.

The film's plot is kind of taken from Mission Impossible 2. And I get it. Michael Bay is a fan of John Woo. But come on... Now, say what you want about the idea that April ( Megan Fox ) as a child having the turtles as her pets. It is kind of stupid. But it is kind of emotionally satisfying, to be frank. I remember the first time I watched this movie, seeing little April ( Malina Weissman ) saving the turtles from fire, made me cry. Even though immediately I was like "wait... what... she saves her pet turtles by dumping them near a sewer?". I suppose it is stupid. I mean, the execution is rather stupid. But the idea isn't terrible. It could be really cool actually. It could be emotionally satisfying to have this sort of thing. Just the writers sort of fucked it up.

The visual effects of the turtles themselves are fucking flawless. I've seen this design in 3 films ( this one, its 2016 sequel and Spielberg's Ready Player One ) and every time I see those turtles I love them. I remember watching the damn movie with my girlfriend some time ago. And I thought that maybe she would not like them. But she got fucking horny on those turtles. She got really into the turtles in a very Shape of Water by Guillermo del Toro kind of way. As in, you know Mikey in this film has a crush on Megan Fox's April. Well my girlfriend wanted to be April. This is some rather sexy design. But also knowing how hard visual effects can get, I respect the fuck out of the work the VFX artists put into those turtles. Because they're fucking amazing. The rendering is flawless. And I totally get reusing those rigs, when Spielberg wanted to populate the backgrounds of Ready Player One with recognizable characters. Those are some amazing rigs. c:0

I'm kind of conflicted. The movie is both very good and very strangely stupid in the same time. The direction is good, both Liebesman's and Bay's ( who I believe directed at least some of the shots ). And most importantly their styles work together. Maybe they need to try to make another movie together. Actually co-directing it this time in a 50%-50% kind of way. That could be cool. The only big question I have from this movie is: What's up with this The Texas Chainsaw Massacre curse?

Happy Hacking!!!

[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  Troler c:0


Michael Bay likes shorter, messier shots.


I perceive such Bay shots as more intense. When watching an action scene drag on, it doesn't hit as much as short bursts of action.

I'm also a fan of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Specifically the 2003 animated series, not the original 1987 animated series


I preferred the 2012 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. It is so serious and grim. It has a scene where a person hasn't slept for 30 years, due to fear that a demon will come out to life if he does so.

But she got fucking horny on those turtles

[embedded image]


[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon reviews]TMNT 2007 is borderline suicidal

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 9 💬 1



So in 2007 TMNT by Kevin Munroe our beloved Ninja Turtles help an old suicidal man finally die. Like yeah, the film is supposedly family-friendly and magical. And the whole suicide thing has to do more with the curse of immortality. But yet. The turtles helped a guy kill himself in this film. And he was very happy to die right in front of them.


#tmnt #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Blow Out 1981 is De Palma's take on The Conversation

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 11 💬 2



47th Academy Awards from 1975 ( giving awards to movies from 1974 ) was an interesting spectacle. Francis Ford Coppola's film The Conversation ( which was nominated for Best Picture ) lost to The Godfather Part II also by Francis Ford Coppola. In 1981 Brian De Palma, one of the people who hanged out with Francis at the time, decided to remake a 1966 Italian film Blowup, but doing it like Coppola's The Conversation. Where sound plays a critical role in the plot of the picture.


#BlowOut #NancyAllen #BrianDePalma #JohnTravolta #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Vicious 2025 is a cool little therapy movie

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 14 💬 1



A lot of horror films are therapeutic in nature. They let you see and examine some dark things about yourself or the world. And that is a good thing. For example, some people were "cured" from suicidal thoughts by watching the Saw franchise. A running theme in those films, is that Saw would choose some rather depressed, suicidal individuals for the "games". Where they need to do some utterly bad shit crazy things to themselves, to survive. That puts the whole suicide thing into perspective. Making you really understand how pointless it is, as a solution. The 2025 film Vicious written and directed by Bryan Bertino and starring Dakota Fanning is also a therapy horror film.


#vicious #dakotafanning #horror #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Eden 2024 is very interesting in context

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 14 💬 1



In the summer of 2025 Sydney Sweeney made a controversial, seemingly Nazi-propaganda advertisement for a Jeans brand that claims that she "has great Jeans" ( which is a pun for "genes" ). Being a blue-eyed sexy blond woman, made the "genes" pun quickly interpreted as a endorsement of eugenics. And a lot of people on the conservative side equated her "huge tits" to the "death of wokeness". While people on the left decided to attribute her success with her sex appeal, almost accusing Sweeney with sleeping with executives, to become famous. And yet despite all this, Ron Howard's 2024 thriller Eden ( which is starring Sweeney ) has Ana de Armas at a role of this super-hot lady that sleeps with men to get what she wants.


#eden #ronhoward #anadearmas #SydneySweeney #JudeLaw #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Backdraft 1991 is a HOT film

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 3



Ron Howard is a hell of a director. He knows how to get the image that he wants. And he knows how to do it so that it will hold up practically forever. His 1991 fire-fighters movie Backdraft is not an exception. The fire sequences are so real and so visceral in this film, despite being done 3 decades ago, that perhaps this film is even better when it comes to planning shots that hold up than his Apollo 13 movie ( where he used real weightlessness to shoot the space scenes ).


#backdraft #firemen #firefighters #fire #movies #cinema #ronhoward #film #review #cinemastodon


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]