Imagine being born in the year 1930, starring in films since the 1950s and yet in 2024 ( at the age of 94 ) releasing a movie you directed. If you want to talk anti-ageism Clint Eastwood is the motherfucker you point to. Hell he even made a movie about anti-ageism in the early 2000s, called Space Cowboys which is a light rip-off of Armageddon. This time thought he swings at us with a great rip-off of a 1957 Sidney Lumet classic 12 Angry Men.
Some actors cannot produce emotion, which looks very bad. But a lot of bad actors over-act. Which is not good either. Today, watching the 1984 Walter Hill movie Streets of Fire, I think I finally saw an over-directed film. Is this a bad thing? No! The film is a blast. But it is not your typical movie. It is trying so hard that it crosses the line into avant-garde cinema, while remaining a dumb action film.
Wrath of Man is one of such, very Guy Ritchie, very crime trillery, very Quentin Tarantino
inspired films. It has just enough cold detachment, just enough calculated precision and just enough artful pathos to make you feel the false-psychopathy of the main character played byJason Statham.
![[icon fc]](/icon/fc)
Free Competitors
![[icon ]](/pictures/favicon.png)
blenderdumbass . org
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/be/Juror_No._2_%282024%29.jpg/250px-Juror_No._2_%282024%29.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ee/Streetsposterart.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/af/Wrath-of-man.jpg/220px-Wrath-of-man.jpg)