[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon scene] Articles

How They Made Freedom Illegal

May 30, 2024

👁 117

https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/megalopolis:_the_high-brow_bullshit_i_enjoy : 👁 4
https://blenderdumbass.org/about/making_breakable_cars_in_video_games : 👁 1
https://duckduckgo.com/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/Paternalistic_Laws_Make_Very_Little_Sense : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/did_pewdiepie_just_crack_the_code_for_how_to_present_libre_software_ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/books/Sheiny_The_Hacker : 👁 17
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/Is_BeamNG_Drive_a_Free_Software_Game.md? : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=paradox&fc=on&title=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 2 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


8 Minute Read



Freedom is illegal. There is not a single country in the world that is 100% Free. And it is not a mistake. If a country is 100% Free the government has no control. And therefor why bother trying at the elections. Right? We all are somewhat familiar with the tactics of how governments make sure that their countries are not free. They use the same 2 boogiemen every time: ↩ Reply


Sometimes one works better than the other. In the time of tension and cold war Terrorists are those brought into the picture every time the public demands more freedom. But lately this tactic no longer works in civilized counties. At the very least people are realizing that it is just a tactic. And that fighting somebody who threatens the freedom of the people in the country by taking away freedom is in the very least counter-productive. ↩ Reply

It leaves us with the second category and the topic of this article. ↩ Reply

How "Think Of The Children" Ruins Our Freedom?


Have you ever noticed that organizations or people that are fighting for freedom for a long time sound like group of child molesters? You probably head about all kind of ways those who want to collect our personal information claim that it is to stop child pornography from spreading. Various laws are being proposed to scan people's encrypted communications for it. But then freedom activists are often attacked like this as well: ↩ Reply



  • Julian Assange, even though not related to children, was arrested originally based on somebogus sexual harassment allegation. But then it was completely forgotten in favor of focusing on the real reason he was arrested. He had way to much Free Speech. ↩ Reply


  • People even spread rumors that Steven Spielberg, a director who recently made a handful of pro-freedom political movies, is some kind of child molester too. ↩ Reply
All those examples seem like bogus attempts at canceling people that are pro freedom on charges that are obviously against freedom. Rape is often brought up, like in the case of Justin Sane or Julian Assange. Because rape is in essence a violation of freedom of another person. And therefor if you spread rumors that some political pro-freedom person is a rapist, you automatically disqualify this person. But it is not that simple. It's not all lies. ↩ Reply

Richard Stallman actually had a problem with the word "Assault" and had other publication where he argued for borderline pro-pedophilic stances. And EFF is actually claiming that porn is free speech and therefor kids should be able to access it. And that is where the problem lies. ↩ Reply

If you are pro-freedom you are anti-ageism


If you are pro-freedom, you are pro all freedom. There is a distinction to be made between freedom and power, of course. Power being somebody taking away freedom from somebody. So if you are pro-freedom you are anti-power. But as long as something is freedom and not power you pro it. ↩ Reply

But who's freedom? Well everybody's. Right? If you are pro-freedom you are not thinking only about yourself or your group. You are not limiting yourself to who gets freedom and who doesn't. Everybody gets freedom. All freedom. ↩ Reply

Is walking around the street freedom? Yes. Are Asian people part of all people? Yes. So if you are pro-freedom you are pro Asian people walking down the street? Yes. ↩ Reply

But then sex is a freedom, if all participants consent to it. Otherwise it is rape ( power ). So all consensual sex is freedom. And therefor if you are pro-freedom you are pro all consensual sex. What if a man and man wanted to have consensual sex? Well you are not excluding nobody from the freedom and therefor if you are pro-freedom you are pro homosexual rights. ↩ Reply

But then kids are also people. And you see how the logic goes. If you are pro-freedom you pro kids walking down the street. You pro kids having consensual sex. You pro kids accessing whatever information they want to access. And so on and so forth. ↩ Reply

Making you a target for the government. ↩ Reply

To avoid being a target, you should not be pro-freedom. Which makes the government win either way. ↩ Reply

Lies in the law


One way government can undermine your stance on freedom is by using lies written in the law. There was a law proposed in the early 20'st century in the US which was going to define the value of Pi. Making what's called a "Statutory Pi". The funny and ironic thing is that the law in question had a wrong value for Pi ( 3.2 ). Therefor making Pi legally something else than the real thing. The law didn't pass, but the concept stayed. ↩ Reply

In the case of, say, Justin Sane from Anti-Flag a big part of it are allegations of so called "Statutory Rape" against him. Those are not allegations of Rape. Those are allegations of "Statutory Rape" a different kind of rape. One that is defined in the law but actually didn't take place in the real world. ↩ Reply

When you hear that something is "Statutory Rape" it means that two people had normal consensual sex. Something that a pro-freedom person would fight for. But that the law claims that this particular consensual sex was rape. Turning pro-freedom into pro-power by utilizing lies in the law. ↩ Reply

Paternalism and emotional manipulation


It is hard to argue with "Think of the children" because children are so cute. And of course you want them to be safe. War crimes reports, for example, bring special attention to harm caused to children. Because it works. People are more emotionally resonant with children. It is like this for evolutionary reasons. Children are actually weaker and stupider than most adults. And the smallest ones are borderline helpless. And therefor we developed into child-caring machines. ↩ Reply

Therefor whenever somebody uses words that sound like harm is being done to a child, people's automatic reaction is hate toward whoever is claimed to be doing that harm. ↩ Reply

But there are two types of people: ↩ Reply

  • Those who react without much thinking.- Those who actually think of the children. ↩ Reply


Who in their right mind wants harm? So a pro-freedom person is anti-harm. But not necessarily. Sometimes people are not in their right mind and will consent to harm. Which puts a pro-freedom person into a weird state of paradox. ↩ Reply

Should freedom be beyond safety? Or should safety be beyond freedom? Governments and people who want to take the freedom away side with the safety. And making all those people who are pro-freedom sound like savages that only want to harm people. But we are not. ↩ Reply

Being anti-paternalism is hard because it is so paradoxical. But it is important if we want to have freedom. If you are actually thinking of the children, you should make sure that if they want, and only if they want, they could harm themselves. Because that is what freedom is. There are plenty of ways to argue with them out of wanting it. There is free speech to do so. But restricting them against their will is even more harm. ↩ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply


[icon unlike] 0
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[icon question]











[icon reviews]Drive-Away Dolls 2024 is Ethan Coen's attempt as a Grindhouse picture

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 7 💬 1



Ethan Coen is a brother of Joel Coen with whom they made a lot of cool black-comedies and other cinema throughout the years. From starting a mock-religion with The Big Lebowski in 1998, to winning a best picture Oscar in 2007 with No Country for Old Men and doing other great cinema before, after and in between, those motherfuckers know how to make movies. So then comes a movie just from Ethan ( and his wife Tricia Cooke ) about lesbians, that is intentionally trying to be a bad film ( like the bullshit Robert Rodriguez is doing with Mechete )? Interesting...


#driveawaydolls #ethancoen #MargaretQualley #film #review #comedy #movies #cinemastodon


[icon articles]Why pedophilia in particular is such a great tool when it comes to arguing for mass surveillance

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 62



People in the government rarely have the interests of the public as their primary goals. This has been like this since the invention of governments. But while with kings and queens of the middle ages it was apparent that it's the case, politician now a days with democracy, which allocates some control to the masses, have to pretend that they care about this thing of that thing, so that the masses would choose them to form the government. There is no reason to be a politician if you aren't fighting for some sort of control over the masses. Very rarely politicians are genuine, and even those that are, are swapped into the same scheming and manipulations of the public as any other ones. The competition demands thins kind of vicious behavior. The unfortunate truth is that for those manipulations of the masses, there should be mechanisms for such manipulations. And if the masses can get away from those mechanisms by forming ways to preserve their rightful freedoms, the government has to intervene and scheme something so that the freedom itself would sound like a bad idea to the masses.


[icon reviews]The Terminator would not have happened if not for Rear Projection

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 11 ❤ 1 💬 2



So James Cameron is in Italy, having a fever. I mean of course he is. He was just involved in a nightmare project that is Piranha II. While there he has this fever dream of a nightmarish scenario. A metal skeleton coming out of a fire.


#Terminator #TheTerminator #JamesCameron #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Is Idiocracy 2006 intentionally stupid?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 11 ❤ 2 💬 2



We all know about absolute cinematic masterpieces like The Room by the legendary Tommy Wiseau. Films that were intended to be great works of cinema, but that failed so miserably at achieving their goal, that they spawn all the way around the scale and became great works of cinema, by mistake, anyway. But then there are films like The Grindhouse movies, or Black Dynamite, or Wiseau's sequel to Samurai Cop, who's goal was to be those intentionally terrible pieces of crap, from the get go. Is Idiocracy by Mike Judge from the first type of terrible movies, or from the second, intentional one? Is Idiocracy intentionally stupid?


#idiocracy #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]