Julian Assange vs Josiah Mizukami
👁 44
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/moulin_rouge__a_tearsqueezer_on_cocaine_ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles?page=6 : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/software/bdserver : 👁 1
https://search.yahoo.com/ : 👁 1
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
Information or opinions might not be up to date.
DISCLAIMER!!! This article touches upon the drama of Josiah Mizukami who is being arrested at the moment for allegedly being a pedophile. I will say things that could upset you, by bringing them in this particular context. But that would be perfectly normal things to say in any other context. I think that this is a good type of drama to use for such deep philosophical analysis. ↩ Reply
Imagine being locked up in prison for something that's legal. And not even merely legal. For something that is a human right. There is this very small human right, I don't know if you know about it, it's called the Freedom Of Speech. An ability to express your opinion without being persecuted for it. And it's more than essential. It's the cornerstone of things like Freedom in general. Sometimes though bad people that are trying to persecute you for this anyway - are smart. And they will look for any other way of shutting you up if this one is not available for them. Good example is Julian Assange. Not so good example could potentially be Josiah Mizukami. ↩ Reply
"What did he do?" - asked the mother of Chloe. Sheiny and Chloe were at Chloe's house. They were looking at some stuff on a computer. And Sheiny was scrolling through the suggested section inside of FastLBRY-GTK. Chloe was looking at the monitor too. And she caught a glimpse of a video by @SomeOrdinaryGamers:a titled "The Biggest Creep On YouTube Got Arrested..." with a picture of Josiah Mizukami in handcuffs. Chloe exclaimed something along the lines of - "How dare they put him to jail for this?" and her mother quite curiously asked - "What did he do?". ↩ Reply
A moment of awkward silence occurred. Her mother was not aware of Sheiny's little business. So both of them contemplated for a while of whether to say what Josiah Mizukami did. Because even knowing that, could be weird enough for the girls their age. But there was no necessity in telling anything, because the mother came over and looked at the screen herself. She read the title and waved at it as something that was deserved. ↩ Reply
Mom: The lesson is, don't be creeps, I suppose. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Eh... ↩ Reply
Chloe: Technically speaking he didn't do anything. ↩ Reply
Mom: Well, if the police arrested him, he did something. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: It was American police. ↩ Reply
Mom: What's the difference? ↩ Reply
Chloe: All he did was say things people didn't quite like. ↩ Reply
Mom: Well, I guess, then it's not good to say things that people do not like. ↩ Reply
Chloe: But... Ah... America is democratic. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Yeah, there is this right called the Freedom Of Speech. ↩ Reply
The mother thought for a while. She wanted to impress the girls with a thoughtful answer. ↩ Reply
Mom: Democracy is when most people choose what's good. Right? Like... ah... If he said something that most people didn't think was right. Then it was wrong. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: You are confused. Democracy is just the best we can at moment to accommodate everyone in the country, politically speaking. Winston Churchill famously said - "Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.". And you know what I mean by that? ↩ Reply
Mom: Ah... No... ↩ Reply
Sheiny: I mean that in order to give people total freedom, they have to be able to fork the law. But it's impossible in practice. Therefore we have the best system that is possible, which is democracy. And it's only in relation to the creation and approval of laws. Or in relation to representatives that do a micro-democracy for us to choose laws. But what we are talking about is not democracy but rather the freedom of speech. And you know what George Orwell said about that? He said - "Free speech is my right to say what you don't want to hear." ↩ Reply
Mom: Well... Ah... All I could understand from this is that, apparently you are running for a president soon. And I'm voting for you. I have no idea what you just said, but it sounded very smart. ↩ Reply
Chloe: She just said that Free Speech means to be able to tell unpopular opinions. ↩ Reply
Mom: Okay, but what exactly did this creep say, then? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Why does it matter? ↩ Reply
Mom: Well, what if he said something so outrageous... ↩ Reply
Chloe: So what? ↩ Reply
Mom: I mean... Isn't there supposed to be a line? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: No! Free Speech means you have the right to say absolutely anything. ↩ Reply
Mom: But then people would... ↩ Reply
Sheiny: I know, I know! But that's the idea. People should be able to say anything they like to say. ↩ Reply
Mom: What did he say? ↩ Reply
Chloe: It's about sex, Mom. ↩ Reply
Mom: Did he tell stories about it? I don't understand. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: He claimed that Zoophilia, Incest and Pedophilia are natural and completely harm free. And that everybody should do that. ↩ Reply
There was a shock that came over mother's face. Her eyes sank back and she fell into the closest chair. ↩ Reply
Mom: Oh, well... That explains everything! ↩ Reply
Sheiny: What does it explain exactly? ↩ Reply
Mom: Well, people like him should go to prison and rot in hell there. ↩ Reply
Chloe: For saying things? ↩ Reply
Mom: For saying these things, yes. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Well, then we have no freedom of speech. ↩ Reply
Mom: What does it have to do with freedom of speech anyway? He is a sick, creepy individual. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: You are committing an Ad Hominem. ↩ Reply
Mom: Chloe, translate to me what she said. ↩ Reply
Chloe: I have no idea myself. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Ad Hominem. Ah... A logical fallacy when you focus on the messenger instead of focusing on the message. He could be any number of things. He could a rapist as far as I'm concerned. But he should still have the right to say what he wants to say. ↩ Reply
Mom: But why? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Okay... What if he's right? ↩ Reply
Mom: He? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Yes. ↩ Reply
Mom: But he isn't. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Are you sure? ↩ Reply
Chloe: Sheiny, it doesn't matter if he is right. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: I know. But look at this, this way: We have free speech so ideas that could be revolutionary could surface up. Yes, with that a bunch of non-revolutionary, stupid ideas would surface as well. But if we close the pipe for, I don't know, stopping misinformation, or avoiding uncomfortable topics, we loose the chance to get anywhere. For example, Edward Snowmen revelations. They are essential! But they are frightening. For example the proposition of the theory of relativity to solve the little problems that were in the Newtonian model. What if the person could not talk about relativity because it would be "factually incorrect" or something, because the current view of the world involves the Newtonian physics? We should be able to challenge ideas. He just so happened to challenge our preconceptions about sex. ↩ Reply
Chloe: Not only that, Sheiny, what about fiction? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Yes. Well.. Hell... I should be able to say that I'm a 25 year old man, even though it's obviously false. ↩ Reply
Mom: Yeah, but his message is harmful. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: How is it harmful? It's just words and ideas. ↩ Reply
Mom: What if somebody will believe him and break the law? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: What if I say - "Lets take drugs!" - and you take drugs. You are the stupid one. All I did was talk. And you took the drugs. Talking is not against the law. Taking drugs is. ↩ Reply
Mom: But... ↩ Reply
Sheiny: You know that the US government thinks publications of Julian Assange are a threat to the US national security? While all he does is journalism. Yes, an internet kind of journalism. But journalism. ↩ Reply
Mom: Who is that? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: You don't know nothing? ↩ Reply
Mom: I'm just a Mom. ↩ Reply
Sheiny breathed in heavily. She couldn't believe that she needs to explain literally everything. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: There is this website called WikiLeaks which allows people to leak information about anything they see as worthy of publication. For example Edward Snowmen was helped by WikiLeaks to leak his revelations about the US government. And people like Chelsea Manning leaked there their Iraq files. Including a very gruesome video of US government bombing innocent civilians in Iraq. Anyway... The guy behind the website is this guy called Julian Assange. And he was arrested for the last couple of years without even being sentenced. ↩ Reply
Mom: Well it looks like his site was highly illegal. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: It wasn't. First of all both where he was and in the US there is the freedom of speech. On top of that the US also has a special second freedom of press. And on top of that Julian is not even a citizen of the United States. And he operated outside of the United States. So he could not by any chance violate any US law, which the US government claims he did, even if there was something they could charge him with, which they can't. This is by the way why he is in perpetual arrest, rather than in prison. You arrest people before they go to court. But what if the court cannot find the person guilty? But everybody involved really would like to find that person guilty... They just keep him arrested. Forever. ↩ Reply
Mom: That does sound kind of scary. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: It seems like, a similar tactic is used against Josiah Mizukami too. ↩ Reply
Mom: Who's that, the creep dude? ↩ Reply
Chloe: They hold him for words! ↩ Reply
Mom: Yeah, but what he said, kind of puts him in the bad light. ↩ Reply
Chloe: So what? ↩ Reply
Sheiny: Don't get me wrong. This dude seems delusional. He claims that he is a god. And that some girl about our age is in love with him, or something. He behaves a bit strange. He is too calm. Probably a sign of psychopathy. But then again. All of those things he said, he just said. As far I know, he seems to be arrested for words. Which no matter what words were used, to be arrested for them, should be and is, on paper, a violation of human rights. ↩ Reply
Mom: I believe most people will be happy for him to go to prison. ↩ Reply
Sheiny: And they are! But we are not talking about democracy here. We are talking about human rights. Remember democracy is not a good system. It's just the best we currently have. Though with free speech, we can do much better than democracy. Let people yell. Let people use all the swear words on the dude that they can. Let people criticize. If somebody says something you don't like. If somebody says something you find incorrect. Instead of trying to remove him, add! Speak against him. Deconstruct and debunk him. Don't arrest him. What the hell is wrong with you, if you do? ↩ Reply
Happy Hacking! ↩ Reply
Find this post on Mastodon
![[thumbnail]](https://archive.org/download/j.-y.-amihud-little-naomi/album.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/question.png)
![[thumbnail]](https://notabug.org/jyamihud/FreeCompetitors/raw/master/favicon.png)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e2/Flight_risk_2024.jpg/250px-Flight_risk_2024.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/windows_lock.png)