[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews

Is Dracula 2025 the ultimate Luc Besson film?

February 12, 2026

👁 14

https://mastodon.online/ : 👁 1
https://www.google.com/ : 👁 3

#dracula #lucbesson #CalebLandryJones #film #review #movies #cinemastodon

License:
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


11 Minute Read



Just a year ago we had Nosferatu by Robert Eggers. A truly horrid type of a horror film, based on the story of Dracula. A real cinematic treat for the fans of horror. But then suddenly in 2025 Luc Besson was just like... "Hey, I also made a Dracula movie". At first I was skeptical about it. Why would Luc Besson care about some horror tale? But after finally seeing it I must tell: This movie has more to do with Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein than Nosferatu. And I am not just talking about Christoph Waltz here... ↩ Reply

While Robert Eggers had a proper attempt at making a true, real, horror film out of his version of the story, Luc Besson's film is not a horror film at all. He does play with horror elements here and there, but on the whole, the film feels ( aesthetically speaking ) no scarier than his Les Aventures extraordinaires d'Adèle Blanc-Sec ( which is roughly as scary as something Indiana Jones ). ↩ Reply

What Luc Besson does instead, is that he flips the story on its head. Making the Dracula in this version, not a monster that the protagonists need to kill, but the hero of the story. Count Dracula, played ingeniously by Caleb Landry Jones, in this movie, is the protagonist. And the story's emotional weight holds on his personal emotional arc. In a way it is very similar to what Guillermo del Toro did with his version of Frankenstein that coincidentally came out the same year and coincidentally also stars Christoph Waltz. ↩ Reply

Watching it now, for the first time ( I will be watching it again ), I counted at least 3 specific references to Besson's other film Leon: The Professional. First, one of the girls that Dracula "seduces" into becoming a vampire is played by an actress named Matilda De Angelis. If you remember, in Leon one of the two main leads is Matilda. Then we have a very interesting moment. Count Dracula says this line: ↩ Reply

Count Dracula, at your service.
↩ Reply

For those unfamiliar with Leon this line would mean nothing. But if you are familiar with Leon and with the 1992 Dracula movie by Francis Ford Coppola you will get the reference. In the 1992 movie, Dracula is played by Sir Gary Oldman who plays the bad guy in Leon named Norman Stansfield. This Stansfield guy has a catch phrase. He says: ↩ Reply

At your service.
↩ Reply

This one line of dialogue, by Besson, is a double cinematic reference. And also, which is important for this discussion, a reference to Leon. Now, I do see a triple reference here, given that the line is spoken by Caleb Landry Jones who proves to be, at least for Besson, the next Gary Oldman. But for the sake of my argument, let's focus on the fact that it is a reference to Leon. ↩ Reply

[embedded image]
↩ Reply

And then there is this. A recreation of a very memorable shot from Leon. Now here, I think the thematic through-line crystallizes itself. The one holding the knife in the Dracula movie is Count Dracula. The holding the knife in Leon is Leon. ↩ Reply

We all know the plot of Dracula. There are no spoilers there. We've seen countless iterations. So I suppose I can analyze the version by Besson as is. Without fearing that you haven't seen the film. So let's do that. If you have not seen ( by some miracle ) any of the versions of Dracula, I suppose, spoilers ahead. ↩ Reply

What is the story of Dracula, in a nutshell? It is a guy who fought bloody wars a very long time ago. He was madly in-love with a woman who was killed. That loss, with his blood thirsty nature made him forgo God himself, which in turn cursed him into eternal, literal blood-lust. He became a vampire. A vampire that is desperately looking for his beloved woman to re-incarnate. So she does. A young girl that bares striking resemblance to the original woman is found by Dracula. He seduces her, to be his. She becomes his. And then he is defeated by the hero. ↩ Reply

In the 1992 version there is a strong psycho-sexual tension in the air. Dracula is first and foremost a seducer. His presence unlocks a hidden lust in the women around. For the people in the 1890s ( when the story was originally written ), such lust was a sign of "hysteria". For a woman to be lustful, was seen, utterly inappropriate. So the original book and the 1992 version view this lustfullness as an undesirable, scary, side-effect. Dracula uses his dark magic to "corrupt" the young girls. To poison their mind. The backstory of his trauma only explains his motivation. But does not justify them. In the end of the day, he is a bad guy for doing what he is doing. And the woman he seeks to so much, when cured from his curse, must then return to her "true love", or the hero of the story. ↩ Reply

The 2024 Robert Eggers film Nosferatu is doing a similar thing, but with a modern 21 century spin and a lot more horror elements. The movie is about this "hysteria". It is about this dark sexual magic. But it is also about gross shit and scary deaths and stuff. ↩ Reply

Luc Besson on the other hand, spins the whole thing around, in a clever, kind of way. If any other film would introduce Dracula as this intimidating character. Would build a bunch of suspense before you see him for the first time. Luc Besson doesn't do that at all. The first thing we see is young Dracula, before the curse, madly in love with his Elisabeta ( Zoë Bleu ). We actually spend quite some time with them madly in-love before we get to the battle and the tragedy that is only told in flashbacks in 1992 film. And that is all but almost absent from Nosferatu. ↩ Reply

Here is an interesting thing, which could be another thing that ties this movie to Leon. In the 1992 version Elisabeta is played by Winona Ryder who is known to be Jewish. Zoë Bleu ( who plays Elisabeta in Besson's version ) also seems to be from a Jewish family. And who else is also Jewish? That's right... Natalie Portman who plays Matilda in Leon. ↩ Reply

I think that Elisabeta in this film stands for Matilda and Dracula stands for Leon. Think about it: She is a reincarnation of a woman who is long gone. So she is a young girl now, while the guy who is madly in-love with her is like 400 years older than her. It is an exaggeration of the same dynamic as in Leon. c:0 ↩ Reply

Does Dracula in this film use black magic to seduce women? Is this seduction thing a bad thing in this film? Well... In this particular movie it seems to be complicated. ↩ Reply

Dracula does use a fragrance to attract people sexually. There is even a very fucked up, brilliant scene, where Dracula attracts a full crowd of nuns to feed on their blood. And they just all want to be with him, despite all of this. This is some of the same shit as with any other version of Dracula. ↩ Reply

But here is the thing. When it comes to Mina ( the reincarnation of Elisabeta ) he isn't doing any of that. She suspects him, at one point, that he might have done something to her. But he doesn't. He doesn't need to use the fragrance, or some other magical bullshit on her, because she is in love with him. She has the same soul as Elisabeta. And even some of the her memories. She is naturally attracted to Count Dracula, because they are truly in-love. ↩ Reply

In Luc Besson's Dracula the love between Dracula and Mina ( or Elisabeta ) is real and true and awesome. Luc Besson doesn't see any hysteria or any problem with their love. In his version, the tragedy is not the lust, but the fact that everybody else wants to stop said lust. Leon is kind of doing the same exact thing. The bad guy in Leon is a police officer. And the bad guy wants to do police officer stuff against our protagonists that are illegally in-love. This is how Luc Besson was seeing it in 1994. And that is how Luc Besson sees it now. Dracula and Mina are illegally in love. And when the "heroes" of the film are about to attack Dracula in the end, you are feeling the same kind of tension and the same kind of fear as when police ambushed Leon. ↩ Reply

There is a thematic difference though. With Dracula, apart from love, you also have the vampire curse. Not the lust curse. Not the sexual hysteria. The blood-thirst. The vampire-shit. In Leon, Leon dies to carry out the wish of Matilda. To kill Stansfield. To kill the man who killer her family. Just so happens that the only way to do so in his situation, would be such that he also needs to die. In Dracula, Dracula realizes something similar. But something where there isn't a bad guy to blame. Something where the bad guy is he himself. She seduced him, to turn her into a vampire. But now he starts to realize that maybe this one action was actually a mistake. It's not her that had the hysteria. It was him. Did went a little too far with her. And the only way to free her from this curse, would be to kill himself. Not because the hero needs to kill the monster, to save the girl. But because the hero needs to save to save the girl. Because the hero is Dracula. And to save the girl, means to kill the monster... ↩ Reply

On the other note... It is very strange that Besson didn't collaborate with Éric Serra on the soundtrack of this film. Éric Serra did the soundtrack for most of Besson's films, including Leon. Instead he used Danny Elfman. I mean Danny Elfman is perfect for this kind of Gothic sounding stuff. He worked on a lot of Tim Burton movies, who's style would be a good approximation of what Besson aimed to do with this movie. But is there a thematic reason for choosing specifically Danny Elfman? Apart from the obvious connection: I mean... Danny Elfman ( as the lead of a band named Oingo Boingo ) once written and performed a song that goes like this "I, I, I love... little girls, they make me feel so good..." c:1 ↩ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply


[icon unlike] 4
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  Troler c:0 February 13, 2026


She is a reincarnation of a woman who is long gone. So she is a young girl now, while the guy who is madly in-love with her is like 400 years older than her. It is an exaggeration of the same dynamic as in Leon.
⤴ View

Question is, are both of them are depressed in the beginning of the film?

... replies ( 1 )
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:2 February 13, 2026



@Troler Kind of, yeah...




[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:1 February 13, 2026


Danny Elfman ( as the lead of a band named Oingo Boingo ) once written and performed a song that goes like this "I, I, I love... little girls, they make me feel so good..."
⤴ View

https://invidio.us/watch?v=H2LQMElLoLs



[icon reply]
[avatar]  Blender Dumbass c:2 February 13, 2026


... c:0
[avatar]  Troler c:0 February 13, 2026


She is a reincarnation of a woman who is long gone. So she is a young girl now, while the guy who is madly in-love with her is like 400 years older than her. It is an exaggeration of the same dynamic as in Leon.
⤴ View

Question is, are both of them are depressed in the beginning of the film?


@Troler Kind of, yeah...

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon reviews]Lucy 2014 Pretentious or Profound ?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 10 💬 1



On the surface level 2014 Luc Besson film Lucy starring Scarlett Johansson is a scientific thesis that is trying to say some grand truth about the world, while pretending to be an action film, to make people go see it. On the other hand though, it is an action film that injects a lot of profound-sounding pretentious pseudo scientific bullshit, to make itself appear as something better than it is: a dumb action movie. Which one of them is it? Or did I miss something?


#lucy #lucbesson #ScarlettJohansson #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Summer of '42 ( 1971 ) is about Empathy

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 21 ❤ 2 🔄 1 💬 6



First time I heard of the movie Summer of '42 when reading Tarantino's review of American Graffiti. In his review a large chunk is dedicated to this picture, because he is trying to illustrate the aesthetic similarities between the two pictures and the broader genre shifts of the 60s and 70s cinema landscape, that gave way to something like American Graffiti. Shortly after that, there was the review by Troler. And then finally, which made me grab my lazy ass and put it into the chair to watch this film, was a conversation I had with @Troler , where he so kindly spoiled the ending of this movie for me, while breaking down the cinematic techniques used in the film.


#summerof42 #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]The Matrix 1999 and how people misunderstand it

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 21 💬 4



"Red Pill" became the go-to word for the right-wing thinkers of the 21st century. They equate taking the "blue pill" to being ignorant. To not questioning what they believe to be "harmful" leftist ideologies. While the "red pill" is the pill towards awakening. Towards enlightenment. Or some bullshit like this. The irony is that the blue pill and red pill was taken from the 1999 film by The Wachowskis called The Matrix. By The Wachowskis, who, if you know anything about the two, are really not the kind of people who would be calling themselves "conservatives".


#thematrix #theWachowskis #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Guy Ritchie's Revolver 2005 explains Luc Besson

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 39 💬 1



I don't remember when was the last time I had watched a movie so strong that my mind literally cannot stop obsessing over it. Being on a Luc Besson marathon I discovered that there is a misunderstood film which Besson wrote together with Guy Ritchie, which was directed by Ritchie, which is called Revolver. The 13% score on Rotten Tomatoes, in my opinion is there just because the critics were literally too dumb, or too insecure, for this movie. Or because this is something the Ritchie and Besson literally wanted to achieve. If the film became a hit, or was well received critically, the message of the film would not have worked as well as it does.


#Revolver #GuyRitchie #LucBesson #Jewdaism #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]She Rides Shotgun 2025 is a hidden gem of near perfection

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 15 ❤ 1 💬 15



I'm furious! How the fuck nobody knows about the 2025 Nick Rowland film She Rides Shotgun starring Ana Sophia Heger and Taron Egerton? What the fuck is this? This movie is so good, yet because studio-heads apparently didn't get it, there was no advertising for it. And only a limited theatrical run. Which resulted in very little people seeing the damn film in the cinema. This fucking film! Are you fucking kidding me? They have fucking best picture Oscar material, and yet they try to hide it from everybody? What the fuck is wrong with you, Lionsgate? Fuck!


#SheRidesShotgun #AnaSophiaHeger #TaronEgerton #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]