blenderdumbass . org
Reviews
Transformers 3 has only 1 flaw
August 17, 2025๐ 13
https://mastodon.online/ : ๐ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/ : ๐ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/atragon__1963__pivots_from_monsters_towards_brian_duffield : ๐ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/transformers_3_has_only_one_1_flaw : ๐ 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=Transformers+3&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : ๐ 1
#transformers #transformersdarkofthemoon #michaelbay #film #review #cinemastodon #movies
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
5 Minute Read
Megan Fox. Megan Fox is the only flaw of Michael Bay's Transformers: Dark of the Moon. The script by Ehren Kruger ( who wrote Top Gun: Maverick and F1 ) was written with Mikaela Banes ( Megan Fox ) as the girlfriend of Shia LaBeouf's character Sam. But because of some drama behind the scenes ( which involved Steven Spielberg for some reason ), she ultimately dropped out of the project, in very late stages of pre-production. Forcing the team to quickly patch her character out in a very forced and obvious way, replacing her with Rosie Huntington-Whiteley who worked with Bay on Victoria Secret commercials. That ultimately made the film very confusing, emotionally.
c:0 โฉ Reply
There were 2 films building this relationship between Sam and Mikaela and then suddenly in film 3 she dumped him, and now Sam is totally and utterly in love with a new girl? Yeah... That doesn't feel right. Yet knowing the behind the scenes drama, and doing a very simple mental gymnastic to either think of this movie as existing in a separate continuity, or thinking of this new actress and being the same exact character as in the last two movies, and suddenly, the movie totally clicks in.
โฉ Reply
Wait... now it suddenly hit me: Sam and Mikaela. This is way too funny. Sam ( as in Samuel, or Shmuel ) is the Jewish name of Steven Spielberg ( the executive producer on these movies ) and Mikaela is definitely a reference to Michael Bay ( Mikaela Banes ). For the first two Transformers movies Spielberg and Bay ( Sam and Mikaela ) were building their relationship. And this movie foreshadows the ultimate fate of the relationship, as Bay would go away from Transformers after the 5th film.
โฉ Reply
But that's besides the point. If you think of Rosie Huntington-Whiteley's character as a proxy Mikaela, suddenly the movie works very well. The film is still full of Bayhem!, especially in the later half of it. The first half of the film, you see a different side of Michael Bay, his insane ability to craft comedy.
โฉ Reply
We have multiple stellar comedic performances from Shia LaBeouf himself, to Ken Jeong's insane character, to John Malkovich, John Turturro and Frances McDormand, just to name a few. The humor is Bayhem!ed a bit. It is very silly and very weird, but very funny in the same time.
โฉ Reply
And then the movie takes a serious turn, as Decepticons attack Chicago. The movie suddenly turns into something that you may almost not expect from Michael Bay. For once instead of just trying to make glorious explosions, Bay uses a lot of effort, to show the destruction as something rather sad and tragic.
โฉ Reply
And if you are making the effort to think of Whiteley as Banes, the sequence where Sam goes into that hell-hole of a city to save her, suddenly is so touching and emotional that you barely can hold yourself from crying. The first time I saw the film ( without thinking of her as Mikaela ) I was completely confused about why the whole movie treats this moment so seriously. But with this small effort this scene, and the rest of the movie suddenly works. Everything suddenly becomes good again.
โฉ Reply
Think about this from the perspective of Michael Bay. When they finished the first film in the franchise, Paramount was quick to announce dates for the 2 other sequels. Bay wanted to take a break between the films, to do something else, to avoid thinking about robots fighting. And he did eventually took his break to do Pain and Gain. But to his surprise the studio announced dates so unrealistically close together that it meant Bay needed to pretty much work on both sequels without a break. He wanted to finish it all off already. And then as they are already starting to shoot, Megan Fox drops out. That must have been insane levels of pressure. And... to add to this... this is the biggest of the 3 first films in scale.
โฉ Reply
The fact that this movie works so well despite all of the flaws is a fucking miracle. Michael Bay is nothing short of a genius here. The way he shoots everything, the way the camera moves, the visual effects!!! The visual effects in this film were done 15 years ago... 15 fucking years ago... and yet films done today look much much worse than that. And the movie was shot in native 3D, which is like next level complexity, both on set and in post production. How the hell did Michael Bay pull this movie off in the first place?
โฉ Reply
I get it. This one actress change suddenly takes a great film and makes a stupid one out of it. But damn it. This was probably the last problem on Bay's head during the filming of this crazy movie.
โฉ Reply
Happy Hacking!!!
โฉ Reply
0
Find this post on Mastodon

Domino 2005 is Tony-Scott-hem!
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Dominoposter.jpg/250px-Dominoposter.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
๐ 18 ๐ฌ 1
Tony Scott appeared to be trying to outgrow Michael Bay in the 2000s. In 2001 he does Spy Game which is a kind of slightly bayhem-ish movie. Where Tony Scott is no longer trying to make pretty pictures, but is trying to go for ultimate intensity. His Enemy of the State before that, is still more of a classic Tony Scott. While making Spy Game his brother Ridley Scott was making Black Hawk Down while Michael Bay was making Pearl Harbor. While Pearl Harbor has the Bay's explosions and stuff, the colors of the film still look relatively normal. Only his next film ( 2003 Bay Boys II ) go crazy with colors. Spy Game, while being more energetic in directing and editing department, than even Enemy of the State still looks like a normal movie, albeit it is a little desaturated. But Black Hawk Down ( probably in attempt of messing with Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan ) is super moody, with extreme contrast and intense colors. A thing that Michael Bay tries to replicate right away for Bad Boys II and then Tony Scott also replicated for Man on Fire in 2004. And then on Domino in 2005, Tony Scott goes even harder with the style. While Bay is doing roughly the same thing in his own way in The Island.
#Domino #TonyScott #MichaelBay #movies #film #review #cinemastodon
The Rock 1996 is Michael Bay's James Bond movie
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/82/The_Rock_%28movie%29.jpg/250px-The_Rock_%28movie%29.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
๐ 16 โค 1 ๐ฌ 3
The Rock by Michael Bay is about an FBI chemist agent ( Nicolas Cage ) who calls for help from an old retired British Intelligence Agent played by Sean Connery himself. No wander there are theories that this agent character could be James Bond, making this film a kind of unofficial Bayhem!ed sequel to Connery Bond films. It's not like he didn't play James Bond outside of the main franchise. He did play James Bond in Never Say Never Again which is a real James Bond film, which is not a part of the main franchise. So maybe, possibly, he did that again here too. We will never know.
#TheRock #MichaelBay #NicolasCage #JamesBond #SeanConnery #QuentinTarantino #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Blue Steel 1990 is the seed that grew into the reason Avatar didn't win best picture
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/37/Blue_Steel_%281990_film%29.jpg/250px-Blue_Steel_%281990_film%29.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
๐ 11 โค 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2
So it's 1990 and Kathryn Bigelow writes and directs an action thriller about a police officer. The police officer is female and the movie almost refuses to sexualize her. Bigelow casts a nice half-Jewish girl Jamie Lee Curtis. And pretty much the whole movie, not a single shot of her emphasizes or admires her body ( apart from one sex scene where we see a very erotic closeup of her stomach ). Making that movie technically feminist. Few years later, in 1994, as James Cameron ( who was married to Bigelow between 1989 and 1991 ) is trying to find the actor to play the wife in his film True Lies. He is reminded of Blue Steel by Bigelow. And decides to cast Jamie Lee Curtis in his film. Giving us that very strange, almost pornographic scene where she does a very erotic strip-tease scene with Arnold Schwarzenegger. More than a decade later, in 2009, both Bigelow and Cameron make a movie. And both of those movies are nominated for the best picture. Yet Bigelow takes home the price. Did Cameron lose due to his pussy curse?
#bluesteel #KathrynBigelow #JamieLeeCurtis #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #michaelbay
Powered with BDServer
Plugins
Themes
Analytics
Contact
Mastodon