blenderdumbass . org
Reviews
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
5 Minute Read
There are 2 types of rebellious code-era film-makers: You have people like Alfred Hitchcock who's career is based on walking on the very edge of the censorship rules, and then not knowing what to do when these rules are lifted with the introduction of the MPAA rating system. And you have people like Stanley Kubrick who makes fucking Lolita under the code and then rejoices when the rules are lifted and makes fucking A Clockwork Orange. Yet, the question still stands: WTF is A Clockwork Orange?
c:0 ↩ Reply
So the main character of A Clockwork Orange is a deranged 15 year old motherfucker Alex DeLarge ( Malcolm McDowell ) ( he starts the book as a 15 year old, Malcolm was in his mid 20s during the filming for legal reasons ). He beats people up, he rapes, he drives like a maniac, he drinks alcoholic milk ( later referenced as the drink of choice by The Dude in The Big Lebowski ), he speaks half-Russian... He is, all and all, checks off, all of the checklist of the terrible terrible juvenile delinquent motherfucker.
↩ Reply
But then he gets cured.
↩ Reply
Twice.
↩ Reply
The original novel by Anthony Burgess tries to give Alex a redemption ark. The original British version of the book ( not the American version, on which Kubrick based the film ) had an additional 21st chapter, where Alex decides to be good even though he doesn't have to be good anymore...
↩ Reply
Let me explain.
↩ Reply
So we start the movie with Alex as the motherfucker. He breaks all of the laws. Does all of the sins. He even jerks off to dancing Jesus figurines while blasting Beethoven 9th and thinking of violence. But due to his fucked up fucked-uppery he gets betrayed by his droogs and ends up in prison.
↩ Reply
In prison he meets the bible. Or more like he meets the book that talks about all kinds of fucked up stories, that Alex can fantasize about. But more importantly he meets a priest. A priest through which he can get out of prison early by participating in the Ludovico Technique treatment program.
↩ Reply
Ludovico? As in Ludvig Van Beethoven... lol
↩ Reply
The Ludovico treatment feels kind of like MK Ultra. The scientists brainwash the fuck out of Alex, so he would have a gag reflex every-time he would even think about any of the wrongdoings he was doing.
↩ Reply
Side-note: For those of you who love Stanley Kubrick conspiracy theories, you may add this one to the list. MK Ultra ( among other US government related controversies ) were leaked to the press between 1973 and 1977, while A Clockwork Orange was released in 1971. Did he know?
c:1 ↩ Reply
In any-case, Alex was cured. He was no longer bad. He was all good. Except now, everybody can abuse the fuck out of Alex. Because he can't do shit to protect himself. Every thought of any violence ( even in self defense ) makes him feel ill.
↩ Reply
Through a series of unfortunate consequences Alex ends up killing himself. Thought unfortunately surviving the attempt. But due to the physical trauma, the rehabilitation cured him both from the self inflicted wounds and from the Ludovico treatment.
↩ Reply
He was cured again.
↩ Reply
So wait the fucking second. Does the movie assert that being an ultra-violent rapist, drunk driver, bully motherfucker, is actually a good thing? I mean Corruption of the audience right?
↩ Reply
Many people tried parsing down what the fuck A Clockwork Orange actually means. At least the version that Kubrick made into a movie ( he knew about the 21st chapter and decided not to put it in ).
↩ Reply
From one side, people argue, that it is a movie that deconstructs treatment of prisoners. And while other movies might make it easier to see the injustices of the prison system, by making the main character wrongfully convicted. In Kubrick's case, he probably wanted to deconstruct it properly, and for that the criminal in question should have been actually a bad person. Otherwise you are not actually asking the correct question.
↩ Reply
But people often dig into Kubrick films a bit too obsessively. Did The Shinning prove he faked the moon landing? People think it did because of the shape of a drawing on the carpet. And the coincidence of Danny ( the little boy ) wearing an Apollo 11 sweater. Did Eyes Wide Shut warned us about Epstein? I mean maybe... Marvin Minsky knew Kubrick, Epstein ( and Stallman ), so why not...
↩ Reply
But here is a thing. While other film-makers talk extensively about the meaning of their films, Kubrick avoided it. In his interviews he is dodging the questions of meaning of his films. He is hiding the intent on purpose. We wants all of us to get fucking obsessed and start looking for the meaning ourselves. He wants us to rabbithole-maxx the hell out his films.
↩ Reply
Wait... it makes a hell of a lot of sense now. The contradictory and plain weird as fuck aspects of Kubrick's films could be explained away with one little thing.
↩ Reply
He was Jewish.
c:2 ↩ Reply
Happy Hacking!!!
↩ Reply
1
Find this post on Mastodon
Taken 2008 is Luc Besson's revenge for Man on Fire by Tony Scott
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ed/Taken_film_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 11 💬 2
On the surface, the 2008 movie Taken directed by Pierre Morel and written by Luc Besson ( he was busy directing Arthur cartoons ) is about how it is dangerous for little girls to be in the world. And about how awful the human trafficking is. And about how good, people who fuck up human traffickers are. But then, out of nowhere, it makes people cheer when a guy is buying an underage girl at a human trafficking auction. As if, it makes you think: Is Luc Besson just trying to show Quentin Tarantino that he is a master of corrupting the audience?
#taken #liamNeeson #LucBesson #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Backdraft 1991 is a HOT film
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a1/Backdraft_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 7 💬 2
Ron Howard is a hell of a director. He knows how to get the image that he wants. And he knows how to do it so that it will hold up practically forever. His 1991 fire-fighters movie Backdraft is not an exception. The fire sequences are so real and so visceral in this film, despite being done 3 decades ago, that perhaps this film is even better when it comes to planning shots that hold up than his Apollo 13 movie ( where he used real weightlessness to shoot the space scenes ).
#backdraft #firemen #firefighters #fire #movies #cinema #ronhoward #film #review #cinemastodon
Predator: Killer of Killers knows how to do a lot with very little
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/9c/Predator%2C_Killer_of_Killers.jpeg/250px-Predator%2C_Killer_of_Killers.jpeg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 60 💬 4
It seems like the movie Trachtenberg was going for here was way too risky and way too ambitious for a studio to green-light it normally. But if he can do that on a fraction of budget. As animation. And not a budget, something like Pixar uses for their ultra-realistic stuff and fluent motion. But on a fraction of that. He can use the trend of animating on-twos and making everything painterly, to cut all of the corners necessary to make this insane movie with the small amount of money that he is given.
#predator #killerOfKillers #PredatorKillerOfKillers #animation #film #movies #cinemastodon #review #DanTrachtenberg
Powered with BDServer
Plugins
Themes
Analytics
Contact
Mastodon