![[icon reviews]](/icon/star)
Le Dernier Combat 1983 doesn't need subtitles
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Le_Dernier_Combat.jpg/250px-Le_Dernier_Combat.jpg)
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
Blender DumbassFrench 1983 Luc Besson film Le Dernier Combat has 2 spoken words throughout its 1 and a half hour runtime. Both of those words are Bonjour, which I bet you already know the meaning of. The film is about a post-apocalypse future where humans lost the ability to talk. The one time two characters in the film have an exchange of Bonjours doesn't even require the understanding of the word to get the impact. It's about them finally being able to utter a word. It is not about them exchanging information.
RoboCop 1987 foreshadows a lot
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/16/RoboCop_%281987%29_theatrical_poster.jpg)
Blender DumbassThere are ( at least ) 3 types of movies: Corporate bullshit, like the shit Disney produces now a days, which for some reason are popular as heck; smart films with a strong message, which win awards but fail at the box office; and the third type: a film with a message, disguised as corporate bullshit, to trick the audiences that it's the shit they wanna see, while actually being the shit they need to see. Paul Verhoeven's 1987 film RoboCop is from the third type.
![[icon articles]](/icon/scene)
Chat Control Violates More Kids than Encrypted CSAM
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/chatcontrol.png)
Blender DumbassWe all know that when politicians tell us to think of the children it is always a bullshit manipulation technique. But I rarely see people actually break down the issue well when it comes to EU's Chat Control.
Why are we blind to 99% of Child Abuse?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/otherAbuse.png)
Blender DumbassChild Abuse in on my mind right now. I have written a screenplay for a feature film that I'm already in early talks to produce. The bad guy in the movie is a child-rapist / child-killer. His presence alone justifies the anger of the heroes and creates the tension in the film. Yet I don't think I can make a movie that is a shlocky exploitation film. The subject matter is a bit too strong for something that careless.
The Goodhart's Law of Child Abuse
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/goodhartschildabuse.png)
Blender DumbassWhen a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
28 Years Later is secretly about the UK Age Verification bullshit
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/38/28_Years_Later_film_poster.jpg/250px-28_Years_Later_film_poster.jpg)
Blender DumbassToday UK is leading the way towards apocalypse when it comes to stupid, ageist child-safety bullshit. And the 2025 Danny Boyle's film 28 Years Later is secretly about that motherfucking thing.
How AI, ICE and Elon Musk Manipulate People Into Supporting Evil?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/ICE_AI_Musk.png)
Blender DumbassElon Musk is now infamous for showing a Nazi-Salute when Donald Trump became the president for the second time. Yet, this is the same Elon Musk, who's cars were disliked by the same people who have a hard on Trump. People who like to burn gasoline. For them an electric-car company is an epitome of wokeness. It was very funny to see, then, Donald Trump making an ad-read to promote those cars, before realizing what he had done and deciding suddenly to hate on poor Musk. Was Musk playing a part of a Nazi? Was the Nazi-Salute a genius marketing move, to try to make the conservative public of the United States consider buying a car they so disliked? Or was it just a funny set of coincidences?
Don't Say "Illegal" When You Mean Wrong
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/illegal.png)
Blender DumbassI find a lot of articles and news sources today that word themselves very strangely. They point out something that is wrong with some political system or other, but they use the word "illegal" to mean wrong.
It's Better to Want It Than to Need It
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/want_it_dont_need_it.png)
Blender DumbassA lot of people claim that they need to use proprietary software, either for work or something else. And the question is. Do they consent to it, or the existence of a need makes it some sort of a power dynamic?
Equal Rights to Kids
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/equal_rights_to_kids.png)
Blender DumbassThe main issue with freeing the kids, is that kids cannot vote. This is not un-doable. With slaves, slaves could not vote. But there were enough non-slaves that agreed that slaves should be freed. So it passed through. With women rights until some point in time women couldn't vote too. But there were enough men, who agreed with women. And now women can vote. Something like this has to happen with children's rights too.
Conservative Ageists Tried Censoring Pepper & Carrot
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/pepper_carrot_kiss.png)
Blender DumbassIt is quite funny to me that we live in the world full with people that contradict themselves whenever possible. Politically Conservative people tend to always bring up "Free Speech" whenever Liberal-minded people disagree with their opinions. Yet they are also very much in the business of censorship themselves. We saw that with Florida's Book Bans and we now see it again with Pepper & Carrot. A comics from David Revoy that was attacked recently by those unable to see people expressing love to one another.
The Paradox of The Paradox of Tolerance
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/paradox_of_tolerance.png)
Blender DumbassFor me personally the word "Tolerance" means something akin to patience. Therefor I don't understand how we arrived at using this word to talk about Freedom. I have already written an article suggesting that it is perhaps a wrong word to use, and something like "Hate" or "Lack of Hate" would be a much better word to describe contemporary politics. But then I keep hearing about this concept called The Paradox of Tolerance which has to do something with the current way the word "Tolerance" is used. But if the word itself is incorrect, how should the paradox make any sense? It is like we are having the paradox of the paradox of tolerance here.