blenderdumbass . org
Reviews
Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood 2019 is Tarantino respecting the audience
September 29, 2025👁 47
https://mastodon.online/ : 👁 1
https://piefed.ca/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews : 👁 1
https://www.google.com/ : 👁 2
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=once+upon+a+time&fc=on&title=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1
#OnceUponaTimeinHollywood #QuentinTarantino #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
From 1 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.
22 Minute Read
People often complain about dumb movies with too much unnecessary spoon-feeding. We get so much explaining and over-explaining that the brain hurts sometimes. You already know what is going on. You are following the story. You don't need no god damned reminder of what you are watching. And yet the studio heads still think that you are too dumb to understand what's going on in front of you on the screen. Respecting the audience on the other hand is a leap of faith on a part of a film-maker and only the greatest do that well. Quentin Tarantino with his 2019 film Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood takes the hardest such leap of his career.
↩ Reply
Tarantino likes to stretch out the tension. As pointed out by Nicolas Winding Refn ( another very good director that does violence exceptionally well ) the blood itself is not the fun part. Violence is like sex, the important part is before the climax. And the longer you can get it, the better. Tarantino likes to do long scenes where you know the ending will be explosive. And the scene builds and builds and builds in tension until ultimately ejaculating with blood at the audience's faces. With Once Upon a Time... Tarantino does his most ambitious build-up yet. He uses the entire run-time of the film, almost 3 hours of it, to build tension to a stupidly intense finale. Yet to do this, he must take the leap of faith and believe the audience at least know something about the history of Hollywood.
↩ Reply
Most people who criticize this film say that nothing happens in it. Well first of all they are lying. There is a very captivating dramatic story about a broken man Rick Dalton played wonderfully by Leonardo DiCaprio. Tarantino usually doesn't make movies like that. His most famous work are not dramatic character studies, but fun violent comedies with a lot of wit to them. Here suddenly there is no promise of violence, it seems. And what we get is an Oscar-bait type character drama about a fucking actor. What the hell! Right?
↩ Reply
Well those people that see this film as some sort of empty boring shell are the ones that prove studio executives right. And those are the ones that need explaining in order to get the movie. Those are the reason we get movies that spoon-feed the audience every second. Because those people don't know the crucial information which is the key to the tension of the film working in the first place. They don't know about the real story of Sharon Tate. And they surely have no fucking clue about how she died.
↩ Reply
The film quickly establishes 3 main elements. It establishes our main characters Rick Dalton and Cliff Booth ( Brad Pitt ). It establishes Sharon Tate ( Margot Robbie ) and her husband Roman Polanski ( Rafał Zawierucha ), and it shows the hippie girls ( Margaret Qualley, Sydney Sweeney and others ). If you know the real story, you can put two and two together and understand that Tarantino has the balls to put the murder of Sharon Tate on the screen. You suddenly say to yourself "oh fuck" and dread the whole movie in fucked up anticipation. Because ( spoiler alert ) in the real life, Sharon Tate was murdered by a gang of hippies under the influence of their cult leader Charles Manson, played in the film by Damon Herriman. Yet since the film has fictional characters, and since Tarantino already rewrote history in one of his other films Inglorious Bastards ( which coincidentally stars Brad Pitt too ), the dread is mixed with a spice of anticipation. Because you know the shit's gonna be interesting.
↩ Reply
From one side you have Brad Pitt. Signaling people to remember Inglorious Bastards and the murder of Hitler at the cinema. Therefor rewriting history. Maybe Tarantino wants to save Sharon Tate. From the other side though, the film has Leonardo DiCaprio, signaling the people to remember Titanic, where he played a fictional character in the real tragedy. And where his character didn't stop the tragedy from happening. Maybe Tarantino will show us her murder in all the inglorious detail.
↩ Reply
Those who don't know shit about her, or about her murder, watch the scenes where she is just wandering around the town, and goes to the cinema. And they ask themselves: why the fuck am I watching this? They don't experience the dread that those people who know the history experience. They don't feel like the shit will go south very quickly. They don't think to themselves how sad this whole thing is. So for them the movie is an empty shell where "nothing is going on". Yet for those who do know Sharon Tate and her murder, the movie is a well crafted emotional roller-coaster.
↩ Reply
When it comes to the Rick Dalton story, I believe Tarantino is both saying something about himself, or fears he has of himself, and both commenting on a sad reality of the show-business. Something which a Tarantino fan years later, borrowing one of the actors will do way more to the point in The Substance.
↩ Reply
Tarantino only wants to make 10 movies out of a fear that he might lose his ability or enthusiasm for the medium at one point and start making mediocre crap. So he is limiting himself to only 10 movies to avoid such fate. Rick Dalton, is therefor a manifestation of this fear, as Rick is falling out of fashion, so to speak. ( Keep this idea in mind, so I will not need to remind you of this when the ending of this review comes ).
↩ Reply
The director of The Substance Coralie Fargeat is known to be a fan of films by Quentin Tarantino. The best example of her fandom-hood could be seen in her 2017 film Revenge starring Matilda Lutz. The film feels kind of sort of like a Tarantino revenge flick. Something along the lines of Kill Bill. But with a Frageat spin on it. Her next film The Substance talks about the same issues, the dramatic section of Once Upon a Time... is talking about. Ageism. Or the tendency of Hollywood to throw away aging stars and replace them with fresh meat. Basically ( as stated in The Substance ) you have to be between 18 and 29 to survive in the show-business. Otherwise you are almost useless.
↩ Reply
Tarantino, while doing his observation way more subtly than Fargeat ( I mean anything is more subtle than The Substance, come on ), he still goes into a direction, into which Fargeat forgot to, or decided not to, go. And that direction is introduced by Tarantino with the character of Trudi Frazer, played so well, she is better than the Oscar winner Leonardo DiCaprion himself in the scene, by the fucking legend herself, Julia Butters.
↩ Reply
First of all, as with all women in the film, Tarantino introduces the 8 year old Trudi with a shot of her feet. And given the real life implication of this ( Tarantino is most certainly a foot-fetishist ) we already see he is trying to invoke a certain concept into the brains of the audience members. Then we notice a strange thing. We have a middle aged man who is psychologically tormented meeting an 8 year old girl somewhere on the back-lots of the Hollywood system. No parents, no guardians in sight. And the two start a conversation.
↩ Reply
But unlike some of the less nuanced movies about Kevin Bacon characters Trudi is not a Pumpkin-puss. She is not a little bitch that Rick can fuck with. She is a serious motherfucker. She is in fact so motherfucking serious, that this broken ass depressed Kevin Bacon character becomes inspired again. And later nails the scene in the movie within the movie.
↩ Reply
And the interesting thing about Trudi is that if you think about her meta-textually, Julia Butters, the actor that played her, is not a little bitch you can fuck with too. Julia Butters is a motherfucking serious motherfucker. I would even say that Julia Butters is the best casting decision Tarantino ever made in his entire career.
↩ Reply
The legend ( that I took out of my theorizing ass ) goes something like this. Michael Bay ( yes Michael Bay ) directed a movie where Tarantino did dialogue touch-ups in 1996 called The Rock. The film was produced and distributed by Hollywood Pictures. An offshoot of Disney that dealt with more mature themed movies. So you can say Michael Bay worked for Disney for a while.
↩ Reply
Then in 2016 Bay makes a serious military picture called 13 Hours, where the script has two little girls that one of the soldiers is talking to on the phone. The girls do not have huge parts. So he doesn't need them to be good actors. He asks around, probably the word gets to the people working at Disney, and one gentleman working there as an animator on such films as Frozen recommends his little girl, who by that point already did some TV acting. ( All of that was me making shit up, so take that with a grain of salt ).
↩ Reply
Michael Bay meets this Julia Butters and puts her in the shots where the soldier talks to them on the phone. But then she probably does something. Some incredible fit of acting. Some crazy timing when it comes to humor. Something... That Michael notices, which makes him thinks he needs to give this girl a little bit more to do. And that is how 13 Hours gets the "25 happy meals" scene, cementing her as a legend.
↩ Reply
( I'm still making shit up ). Tarantino watches 13 Hours and takes Julia into his production for the Trudi character. Now... probably she had nothing to do with the script of the movie. But maybe she did. It is no fucking coincidence that her real life father works at fucking Disney, and the book she reads in the movie is about Walt Disney. If it is a fucking coincidence it is a fucking brilliant coincidence. But what I think happened, is that Trudi was inspired by Julia Butters. It almost feels like Tarantino wrote this part specifically for the girl. I'm taking all this theory out of my ass. I don't know what went there behind the scenes. But it looks like this could be the case. And if it is the case, this is some cool ass case. But if it isn't, at the very least it is a nice fucking legend.
↩ Reply
Now, Julia Butters later played Spielberg's sister in Steven Spielberg's The Fabelmans, which brings me to some interesting 4-dimensionall chess game Tarantino is playing here with us. The scenes between Rick Dalton and Trudi Frazer are inter-cut with scenes of Cliff Booth giving "Pussycat" a lift to the ranch, where a very tense scene about visiting an owner of said ranch goes on.
↩ Reply
First we have a flirtatious exchange between Cliff and Pussy ( Margaret Qualley ) almost suggesting that something will develop between them later as the movie goes. Tarantino even points our attention at that by making their first few conversations entirely without dialogue. In a Quentin Tarantino movie.
↩ Reply
Also it is rather important to note ( and which is more obvious now, since Julia Butters grew up ) Margaret Qualley and Julia Butters are very similar. They look almost like sisters. Maybe that was intentional on the part of Tarantino. He even gave the two girls a similar nickname. Butter's is Pumpkin-Puss which she objects to immediately. Qualley's is Pussycat. Which she wears with pride. Yet in both nicknames there is a reference to a female reproductive organ. He is inter-cutting between the two story-lines probably on purpose trying to point our attention at the thematic through-like that goes through both of these stories.
↩ Reply
So Rick Dalton approaches a little girl on set. And then Cliff Booth gives a ride to a similar girl ( in Rick Dalton's car ), where this girl ( who's name is "Pussycat" or even sometimes just "Pussy" ) offers Cliff a blowjob. And Cliff in return asks her to prove her age, which she can't. Making us believe that she is underage. Cementing a rather interesting thematic through-line.
↩ Reply
While he gives her the ride, the tension in the scene is built from the possibility that Cliff might yield to her seduction and therefore compromise himself legally. At this point we already should suspect her with involvement in the Manson family.
↩ Reply
Then we arrive at the ranch and the ranch has a lot of girls like Pussy. All assumed underage. And all look like they'd fuck Cliff to blackmail him into joining the cult. So the tension is rising.
↩ Reply
Meanwhile Rick Dalton is playing a villain in the movie within the movie. And said villain kidnaps a little girl. Cementing the child-abuse theme of that sequence. Yet Tarantino is smart about it. If Rick could be a Kevin Bacon character. Or at least a temporary representation of one. Cliff and ultimately the guy he comes to see on the ranch ( the owner George Spahn played by Bruce Dern ) are on the other side, as victims in such a situation. If Rick represents the reason the law exists, Cliff represents the victims of those who abuse said law.
↩ Reply
While Cliff ultimately goes away unharmed, George is the one who is harmed. Because as far the film is concerned, he is fucking ( almost without wanting to ) an underage girl, which uses that leverage on him to secure the ranch for the Manson family. That girl is also not a coincidental casting. Because that girl is played by non-other than Dakota Fanning. Who you may know also used to be a little girl acting sensation. And who also worked with Steven Spielberg.
↩ Reply
While Qualley is a mirror of Butters in a looks department. Fanning is a proto-Butters. Fanning is a girl that used to be Butters. And speaking of Spielberg. The movie she did with Spielberg War of the Worlds is referenced almost directly in the ranch scene. As Cliff approaches the front door of the shack, there is a net between him and Dacota Fanning's character. And the camera shoots a closeup of her through said net. A shot that Spielberg did in almost exactly the same way with the same exact actor on War of the Worlds.
↩ Reply
↩ Reply
Tarantino has almost definitely made this shot to reference the Spielberg movie. It is a known thing that Tarantino is a big movie references guy. So a reference to a different movie is something that is expected from him. But why this specific reference? Well, he is trying to draw attention to the fact that Dacota Fanning here used to be a sort of Trudi Frazer. And in a way, if Tarantino didn't actually write Trudi based of Butters. He must have at least written her based on Fanning.
↩ Reply
If we dig even deeper, Margaret Qualley is here not on accident either. She appeared as a porn actress in a proto-Tarantino writer / director Shane Black's film The Nice Guys where a thematic through-line is very much the same one as the one used in this portion of the Tarantino picture. Tarantino is even giving it a reference in the end of the movie, subtly suggesting that both films could exist in the same universe. ( There is a premier of a porno-film in the background, while The Nice Guys ends at a premier of a porn-film ).
↩ Reply
And talking about Kevin Bacon characters Dacota Fanning too appears in a film called Hounddog by Deborah Kampmeier which is undeniably about the thematic through-line of child-abuse. The film literally starts with two kids playing "show me your and I'll show you mine".
↩ Reply
And if we remember that the tension of the rest of the movie hang on the death of Sharon Tate. We can also remember that Sharon Tate's husband at that point was Roman Polanski, who is infamous for having a situation that fucked his life. One day, back in the 70s ( after the death of Sharon Tate ) Polanski, in the house of his friend Jack Nicholson had a little private time with a 13 year old girl Samantha Gailey. This forced Polasnki out of USA. And by this very day people are trying to get Polanski back to get him his sentence, while, strangely enough ignoring the requests of Samantha herself ( who is now a middle aged lady ) to pardon him and leave him alone already.
↩ Reply
It is as if escaping the grip of Harvey Winstein ( which produced all his movies, apart from this one ) made Tarantino finally be able to address the elephant in the Hollywood's room. Freeing him to discuss this topic. Yet being Tarantino and being smart to the point of brain-plosion this made him make probably the most nuanced looks at the subject matter, without even directly stating that this is the subject matter. The closest he gets to literally stating the theme is with Cliff asking Pussy her age.
↩ Reply
But this whole pedophilia theme obviously begs the question: Is Rick Dalton a Kevin Bacon character? Is Rick Dalton a pedophile? Well let's put our tin foil hats and let's prepare our theorizing asses, because I will shit-out a theory and you can agree or disagree with it. Shall we?
↩ Reply
Yes. He is. Rick Dalton, one of the coolest actors in Hollywood lives with his stuntman, with which he doesn't even have sex. He doesn't have a girlfriend. And he seems to be psychologically unstable. And while Cliff is seen flirting with girls that could be adult. Rick has no interest in them and later awkwardly approaches a literal 8 year old. Calling her Pumpkin-Puss for fuck sake.
↩ Reply
Yet Trudi being an absolute legend kicks some sense into the motherfucker and makes him serious. Literally showing Rick that age is just a number, so to speak, by behaving more adult than even he is. And while it could be a terrible thing to do, with a normal person, on Rick it does something entirely different. He realizes that little girls or adult girls... all the same shit. And that opens in him some sexual realization that no longer needs to be suppressed. He can date a grown woman and it will be literally the same exact thing as dating a little girl. Because this 8 year old Trudi is literally the same as an adult and super serious gal. What happens next? Well, he goes to Italy to make spaghetti westerns, dates a few women and later even marries one of them, bringing her to his house in the USA.
↩ Reply
The funny thing is, his new wife Francesca Capucci is played by Lorenza Izzo who you may remember, played one of the psychopath girls in Eli Roth's film Knock Knock and who also was Eli Roth's wife. And if you remember, Knock Knock had the same thematic through-line.
↩ Reply
And now here is my final observation. Do with it whatever you want. I took all this shit so far out of my stupid ass. So... Quentin Tarantino, one of the hottest writers and directors of the last few decades. And he has no wife and no children for a very long time. Suddenly he makes Once Upon the Time... In Hollywood. He make a movie with a character of Trudi, where Trudi is played wonderfully by Julia Butters. Who probably kicks some sense into Quentin himself. One of the girls Rick Dalton is dating in Italy ( before Francesca Capucci ) is played by Daniella Pick, an Israeli model and singer. After the movie Tarantino marries Daniella Pick and they now have two children. The first one they call Leonardo.
c:0 ↩ Reply
Happy Hacking!!!
↩ Reply
0
Find this post on Mastodon
Is Idiocracy 2006 intentionally stupid?
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6b/Idiocracy_movie_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 11 ❤ 2 💬 2
We all know about absolute cinematic masterpieces like The Room by the legendary Tommy Wiseau. Films that were intended to be great works of cinema, but that failed so miserably at achieving their goal, that they spawn all the way around the scale and became great works of cinema, by mistake, anyway. But then there are films like The Grindhouse movies, or Black Dynamite, or Wiseau's sequel to Samurai Cop, who's goal was to be those intentionally terrible pieces of crap, from the get go. Is Idiocracy by Mike Judge from the first type of terrible movies, or from the second, intentional one? Is Idiocracy intentionally stupid?
#idiocracy #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Eden 2024 is very interesting in context
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ab/Eden_%282024_film%29.jpg/250px-Eden_%282024_film%29.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 19 💬 2
In the summer of 2025 Sydney Sweeney made a controversial, seemingly Nazi-propaganda advertisement for a Jeans brand that claims that she "has great Jeans" ( which is a pun for "genes" ). Being a blue-eyed sexy blond woman, made the "genes" pun quickly interpreted as a endorsement of eugenics. And a lot of people on the conservative side equated her "huge tits" to the "death of wokeness". While people on the left decided to attribute her success with her sex appeal, almost accusing Sweeney with sleeping with executives, to become famous. And yet despite all this, Ron Howard's 2024 thriller Eden ( which is starring Sweeney ) has Ana de Armas at a role of this super-hot lady that sleeps with men to get what she wants.
#eden #ronhoward #anadearmas #SydneySweeney #JudeLaw #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Alita: Battle Angel is Robert Rodriguez's Pearl Harbor
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ee/Alita_Battle_Angel_%282019_poster%29.png)
Blender Dumbass
👁 14 ❤ 2 💬 2
In my review of Michael Bay's Bad Boys II I brought up an interesting theory people have about the film. The amount of Bayhem! it holds in could be a direct response to the out-of-the-comfort-zone feel Bay must have had experienced making Pearl Harbor. Basically, the film was so different from what Bay usually does, he had to crank the next movie's Bayhem! up to 11, to make it feel right again. After Robert Rodriguez directed Alita: Battle Angel with an estimated budget of about $200 million, he had to come back to his comfort-zone too. And 3 months later ( that same year in 2019 ) he released Red 11. A micro-budgeted horror film made on almost exactly $7,000.
#alita #alitabattleangel #robertrodriguez #jamescameron #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Avatar: Fire and Ash 2025 is very horny WTF
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/95/Avatar_Fire_and_Ash_poster.jpeg/250px-Avatar_Fire_and_Ash_poster.jpeg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 71 ❤ 3 🔄 2 💬 5
Avatar: Fire and Ash adds a new villain to the Avatar universe, in a form of Varang ( Oona Chaplin, a grand-daughter of Charlie Chaplin ), an evil Na'vi lady with a tribe of fire-hungry psychopaths, traumatized by the shier insanity of human destruction. As she says in the film, when she was little she witnessed a huge fire ( probably caused by human machines ) that destroyed a lot of the forest. There was no Eywa to save them, or provide for them, so she turned to the "dark side", so to speak. So how the writer and director James Cameron show that she is evil? Well, she rapes people.
#avatar #jamescameron #fireandash #avatarfireandash #movies #review #film #cinemastodon
Final Destination 3 is a return to form
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b2/Final_Destination_3.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 10 💬 1
Final Destination 3 is yet again directed by James Wong who is a very needed return. The second movie in the franchise seemed almost like the parody of the genre. With the third film, came back the suspense and the good acting and most importantly, the movie suddenly hits again.
#finaldestination #jameswong #film #movies #review #cinemastodon
Angel's egg boils my heart
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/Y1NOR6V3VL1PHG3L.png)
Troler
👁 18 ❤ 1 💬 3
It is far too easy to drown in the flow of information we have to endure. Most with to take a break from it by rejecting it all together. I say, one ought to train themselves by entertaining to a slow dance. It can be a book, or... a movie. One of such movies is Angel's Egg
#Angel's Egg #angelsegg #Mamoru Oshii #YoshitakaAmano #YoshihiroKanno #GKIDS #Little Amélie or the Character of Rain #AmélieNothomb #MaïlysVallade #bible #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
She Rides Shotgun 2025 is a hidden gem of near perfection
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7d/She_Rides_Shotgun_poster.jpg/250px-She_Rides_Shotgun_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 17 ❤ 1 💬 22
I'm furious! How the fuck nobody knows about the 2025 Nick Rowland film She Rides Shotgun starring Ana Sophia Heger and Taron Egerton? What the fuck is this? This movie is so good, yet because studio-heads apparently didn't get it, there was no advertising for it. And only a limited theatrical run. Which resulted in very little people seeing the damn film in the cinema. This fucking film! Are you fucking kidding me? They have fucking best picture Oscar material, and yet they try to hide it from everybody? What the fuck is wrong with you, Lionsgate? Fuck!
#SheRidesShotgun #AnaSophiaHeger #TaronEgerton #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
How didn't I know about Les Aventures extraordinaires d'Adèle Blanc-Sec?
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/da/Adele_Blanc-sec_Louise_Bourgoin_Luc_Besson.jpg/250px-Adele_Blanc-sec_Louise_Bourgoin_Luc_Besson.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 25 💬 2
D'une manière ou d'une autre, je ne connaissais pas le film de Luc Besson 2010 Les Aventures extraordinaires d'Adèle Blanc-Sec. Excusez mon français. I will continue in English now. I just had a pleasure of listening to people speak French for 2 hours straight, because I just learned about the existence of a movie that for some reason passed my radar. As you know I'm a big enough Luc Besson fan that sometimes I take his personal life blunders personally. I knew about his more obscure Arthur films. And I am anticipating his upcoming 2 films, that nobody seem to know nothing about. But somehow only now I heard about the 2010 Luc Besson film The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec.
#adeleblancsec #lucbesson #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Backdraft 1991 is a HOT film
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a1/Backdraft_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 7 💬 2
Ron Howard is a hell of a director. He knows how to get the image that he wants. And he knows how to do it so that it will hold up practically forever. His 1991 fire-fighters movie Backdraft is not an exception. The fire sequences are so real and so visceral in this film, despite being done 3 decades ago, that perhaps this film is even better when it comes to planning shots that hold up than his Apollo 13 movie ( where he used real weightlessness to shoot the space scenes ).
#backdraft #firemen #firefighters #fire #movies #cinema #ronhoward #film #review #cinemastodon
The Driver 1978 is not quite the original Drive from 2011
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a1/TheDriverPoster.jpg/250px-TheDriverPoster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 27 💬 6
A lot of people say that Nicolas Winding Refn's 2011 film Drive is a remake of 1978 film The Driver by Walter Hill. And to some extent it is true. Both are about a getaway driver. And both drivers are these tough, melancholic characters played by a guy who's first name is Ryan. But that seems to be about it.
#theDriver #WalterHill #action #film #movies #review #cinemastodon
Powered with BDServer
Plugins
Themes
Analytics
Contact
Mastodon