blenderdumbass . org
Reviews
by Troler
Free Software fundamentally misses the point. It fails on a practical, ideological, economic, and political level. Letβs examine precisely how (in a slightly different order for the purposes of presentation).
8 Minute Read
When the two words war and comedy are uttered, in the context of cinema, the icon of Stanley Kubrick rises above all. There's a reason for it to be the case. Both Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb and Full Metal Jacket portray warfare in a humorous matter. S. Kubrick was a comedy director during the Cold War, of course war was touched upon. Even Michael Bay, in some extent, is a military comedian. I would argue the reason is due the fact he wants to make chase scenes and the military is a great excuse for that. One of such cases is Pearl Harbor. To what extent it is a comedy, I'll leave up in the air. Even Steven Spielberg made a comedy about war β
c:0 β© Reply
1941. It is no surprise two of three mentioned directors (including M. Bay) worked on a comedy film set during World War 2. 'Tis the most recognizable war. Unlike what the name suggests, the world spanning conflicts of the war was much or less localized to to Europe and Asia. With two of the realms not crossing into each other until the tail-end of warring. The East battles would not be that well known in the West if not for the Pearl Harbor incident, featured in the aforementioned Michael Bay film. There existed a whole range of heroic and humorous battles in the mainland China. The movie Westward Desperado is just about one of them.
β© Reply
β© Reply
Kihachi Okamoto was a pilot in the Japanese Imperial army during the later stages of WW2. Seeing the horror and meaninglessness of war, his natural reaction was to frown and smile. Crying and laughter, fire and water, yin and yang. The man shifted from serious dramas to silly comedies. Westward Desperado is one of the comedic extremes. It is a spiritual sequel to the more well known 1959 Desperado Outpost. It is a sequel as much as Michael Bay's Bad Boys II is a sequel to Bad Boys. The tie is the same cast and topic. Besides that there is not much of a parallel. Watching the sequel first is not going to diminish the experience at all. I haven't seen Bad Boys, yet was able to follow along its sequel just same. Same applies to this movie.
β© Reply
Very much like the director, it flies through comedic episodes. There exists an overarching story, yet it is not that pronounced. Here episodic refers to ability to take scenes without context and be able to understand them without any confusion. The itself is a capture the flag comedy set in WW2. The scenario practically writes itself.
β© Reply
I am jumping the gun, the title still remains an enigma. What does Westward Desperado even mean? The desperado part is quite clear, it's just an antiquated term for a bold outlaw from southern portions of the Wild West. Which makes sense. The movie is a blend of military, comedy and Western films. The director Kihachi Okamoto is known for being obsessed with Westerns. From these Westerns and directors experience as a pilot comes a blend of moral righteousness and tragedy of warfare. According to Aki240 Westward part comes from episode 14 of Ultra Seven titled The Ultra Guard Goes West. That episode was released in 1968. It would be a totally sound claim if not for the fact Westward Desperado was released in 1960. Unless K. Okamoto had a time machine, I don't believe he would've been able to reference that particular episode. While IntakeCinema notes that the word Desperado in Japanese is Dokuritsu Gurentai, which means independent brigade. One interpretation I've read, which now I can't find, lets assume I heard it in a dream, said the westward part is a play with meaning. As the independent brigade searches for the flag, it splits up. The split members go east, following the sun. As the sun rises, they go the other direction, thus walking in circles. In tongue-and-cheek fashion, it can be said, the sun rises from West and goes to East.
β© Reply
β© Reply
The comedic overtones are likely due to the first movie being misunderstood. Desperado Outpost spoke about the same problems, Westward Desperado does. Abdul Alhazred argues that the audience interpreted the movie as an anti-Chinese propaganda film. There was no possibility to make the movie extremely obscene and violent to a point of becoming comedic, say for instance The House That Jack Built. As @BlenderDumbass mentions, that movie is not a comedy. Comedies don't traumatize people, well they shouldn't. It is a comedy in the sense people laughed to avoid having to take in the graphic footage. Comedies are scenarios where actions don't have long-lasting consequences, think of Bugs Bunny and Charles Chaplin. By raising the stakes of consequences, it loses more and more of the comedic innocence. A man falling from a banana peel turns into a life-long trauma and amnesia. As the consequences keep increasing in scale, they end up being too absurd to be real. A man slips from a banana peel and drops down on a switch activating a nuclear bomb launch.
β© Reply
The cast are as absurd as to be expected. The acting, typical of Japanese cinema, isn't exactly subtle. That comes out more of cultural differences. In a comedy like this, subtle twitches of the hand or eyes are not exactly needed. They exist when Western elements come to play, such as soldiers staking to grab a gun. Subtlety is especially lacking in the Chinese general (Tatsuyoshi Ehara). The character is so over-top silly and absurd, it is hard to not consider it being the radical shift K. Okamoto took in order to subdue the criticism for his former film being too nationalistic. How can a general be taken seriously, when he talks about swinging hammers in the past and thinking about running marathons to the enemy? These Mickey's Clubhouse members are not reserved to the enemy brigade. The commander of the 463 regiment is a parody of the men who value shiny medals over lives of humans. Getting the flag is just a pompous way to show how low some would stoop to get what they need. Few serious characters ground the otherwise silly and off the wash. Were the movie absurd all the time, the humor would be less pronounced. Like a delicately produced gourmet meal, the acting, together with the story adds up to an entertaining cinema.
c:1 β© Reply
Naturally, it is not purely comedic. Slivers of tragedy sneak through. As it comes apparent later on, the director views war as tragedy. The comedic overtone works as an amplifier of the vanity of war. There is an interesting tie in with Stanley Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. Both of the films cover a singing march, while contrasting the context. In S. Kubrick's case it's soldier walking through a city they razed and scorched to the ground while singing Hey! there, Hi! there, Ho! there \ You're as welcome as can be \ M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E. In the movie, the young men are turned into cold and heartless killing machines. Let pronounced but still visible is the case in Westward Desperado. The men, tired after retrieving a burned flag, go onto another mission whole singing: 1, 2, 3, 4 \ 1, 2, 3, 4 \ 1, 2, 1, 2, yay, yay, yay, yay \ Where to next? \ West. East. South. North. \ Any damn which way The singing being energetic, explosive and melody-wise lighthearted. Both of the movies end with the scene of the characters walking away while singing. In both cases they summarize the entire meaning of the movie β war is meaningless.
β© Reply
Fin.
β© Reply
1
Find this post on Mastodon
Westward Desperado Set the Standard of War Comedies
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/9AGEW7R8A90GS0IY.jpg)
Troler
π 15 β€ 1 π¬ 5
It could be said war and comedies don't work well together. How can anything humorous be said about the matters. Those who do must have lost their minds from the war! Cracking jokes and grinning while speaking of most horrific events in human history like it were a regular Friday night, is one of the best ways to come with the trauma. The trauma which never heals, always stays where-ever the eyes turn. Telling a story really helps get the pain off the chest. In a way, Westward Desperado is exactly just that.
#WestwardDesperado #KihachiOkamoto #MakotoSato #TatsuyoshiEhara #AkiraKubo #Japan #film #cinemastodon #movies #review
Man on Fire 2004 is Tony Scott's Leon: The Professional
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e8/Man_on_fireposter.jpg/250px-Man_on_fireposter.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
π 22 π¬ 1
Critics gave negative reviews to 2004 Tony Scott's film Man on Fire because of "grim story that gets harder to take the longer it goes on". Are you fucking serious? How then Lars Von Trier movies get good reviews? Something isn't quite right here. To be frank, the film is very ultra-cinematic. Which could rub some critics the wrong way. Scott doesn't just direct the shit out of it. He also edits the shit out of it. Making one of the coolest directed films in existence. Which if you think about it, isn't particularly what critics find as a serious picture. And yes, the film is grim. At times it feel like a horror film. Not just a thriller. But the film is a rather satisfactory experience.
#manonfire #tonyscott #dakotafanning #DenzelWashington #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Guy Ritchie's Revolver 2005 explains Luc Besson
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b6/Revolver2005.jpg/250px-Revolver2005.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
π 34 π¬ 1
I don't remember when was the last time I had watched a movie so strong that my mind literally cannot stop obsessing over it. Being on a Luc Besson marathon I discovered that there is a misunderstood film which Besson wrote together with Guy Ritchie, which was directed by Ritchie, which is called Revolver. The 13% score on Rotten Tomatoes, in my opinion is there just because the critics were literally too dumb, or too insecure, for this movie. Or because this is something the Ritchie and Besson literally wanted to achieve. If the film became a hit, or was well received critically, the message of the film would not have worked as well as it does.
#Revolver #GuyRitchie #LucBesson #Jewdaism #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Domino 2005 is Tony-Scott-hem!
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Dominoposter.jpg/250px-Dominoposter.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
π 15 π¬ 1
Tony Scott appeared to be trying to outgrow Michael Bay in the 2000s. In 2001 he does Spy Game which is a kind of slightly bayhem-ish movie. Where Tony Scott is no longer trying to make pretty pictures, but is trying to go for ultimate intensity. His Enemy of the State before that, is still more of a classic Tony Scott. While making Spy Game his brother Ridley Scott was making Black Hawk Down while Michael Bay was making Pearl Harbor. While Pearl Harbor has the Bay's explosions and stuff, the colors of the film still look relatively normal. Only his next film ( 2003 Bay Boys II ) go crazy with colors. Spy Game, while being more energetic in directing and editing department, than even Enemy of the State still looks like a normal movie, albeit it is a little desaturated. But Black Hawk Down ( probably in attempt of messing with Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan ) is super moody, with extreme contrast and intense colors. A thing that Michael Bay tries to replicate right away for Bad Boys II and then Tony Scott also replicated for Man on Fire in 2004. And then on Domino in 2005, Tony Scott goes even harder with the style. While Bay is doing roughly the same thing in his own way in The Island.
#Domino #TonyScott #MichaelBay #movies #film #review #cinemastodon
Powered with BDServer
Plugins
Themes
Analytics
Contact
Mastodon