No wonder The Fabelmens takes place in the desert
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/0SUX9D9NIS9XH9EH.jpg)
Troler
👁 7 ❤ 3 🔄 1 💬 4
In the year 2022
Steven Spielberg directed a film about his own life, in a little known feature
The Fabelmans. Although not a full documentary, it's semi-fictional nature was still education. The movie was teaching the audience how to make movies, how a single spark of
The Greatest Show on Earth inspired Spielberg to become a director.
#TheFabelmans #MichelleWilliams #PaulDano #SethRogen #WarOfTheWorlds #TomCruise #DakotaFanning #StevenSpielberg #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Gladiator 2000 is Ridley Scott's turn at mimicking Michael Bay
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Gladiator_%282000_film_poster%29.png/250px-Gladiator_%282000_film_poster%29.png)
Blender Dumbass
👁 8 💬 1
There are quite some differences between the Scott brothers ( Ridley and Tony ) and the Maximus himself
Michael Bay. You can read
Troler's observations and then my rant in the comments to see why they aren't quite the same. But specifically
Tony Scott films sometimes feels almost like Michael Bay movies. Especially early Tony Scott and early Michael Bay, before both of them knew how similar they are and before they started trying to develop each other into opposite directions. Which happened roughly in time with the 21st century. And yet with all this the
Ridley Scott epic
Gladiator which was shot at 20st century and released at 21st, bluntly steals one of the shots Michael Bay is known for.
#Gladiator #RidleyScott #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Déjà Vu 2006 is Tony Scott's Minority Report
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cf/DejaVuBigPoster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 11 💬 2
Tony Scott famously didn't care about the time travel plot of
Déjà Vu which freaked out the writers of the film. As they said, he cared more about the action and surveillance aspects of the movie. He famously cared a lot about surveillance, as visible from his previous
Jerry Bruckheimer collaboration
Enemy of the State. And that means, that a sort of sci-fi surveillance movie, marks
Déjà Vu as the closest thing Tony Scott did to
Steven Spielberg's
Minority Report.
#dejavu #tonyscott #DenzelWashington #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Black Hawk Down ( 2001 ) tries hard to beat Saving Private Ryan
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/0c/Black_hawk_down_ver1.jpg/250px-Black_hawk_down_ver1.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 7 💬 2
In 1998
Steven Spielberg shocked the cinematic frontier with his film
Saving Private Ryan which had one of the most brutal depictions of warfare, with its opening battle-scene. This caused a small shift in the ways Hollywood was trying to cinematically portray war. And who's better than
Ridley Scott, to attempt at beating Spielberg at war footage. Which he tried to do with his 2001 film
Black Hawk Down.
#blackhawkdown #ridleyscott #film #review #movies #cinemastodon
Domino 2005 is Tony-Scott-hem!
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Dominoposter.jpg/250px-Dominoposter.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 10 💬 1
Tony Scott appeared to be trying to outgrow
Michael Bay in the 2000s. In 2001 he does
Spy Game which is a kind of slightly bayhem-ish movie. Where Tony Scott is no longer trying to make pretty pictures, but is trying to go for ultimate intensity. His
Enemy of the State before that, is still more of a classic Tony Scott. While making
Spy Game his brother
Ridley Scott was making
Black Hawk Down while Michael Bay was making
Pearl Harbor. While
Pearl Harbor has the Bay's explosions and stuff, the colors of the film still look relatively normal. Only his next film ( 2003
Bay Boys II ) go crazy with colors.
Spy Game, while being more energetic in directing and editing department, than even
Enemy of the State still looks like a normal movie, albeit it is a little desaturated. But
Black Hawk Down ( probably in attempt of messing with
Spielberg's
Saving Private Ryan ) is super moody, with extreme contrast and intense colors. A thing that Michael Bay tries to replicate right away for
Bad Boys II and then Tony Scott also replicated for
Man on Fire in 2004. And then on
Domino in 2005, Tony Scott goes even harder with the style. While Bay is doing roughly the same thing in his own way in
The Island.
#Domino #TonyScott #MichaelBay #movies #film #review #cinemastodon
Piranha II 1982 taught James Cameron how not to make sequels
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f1/Piranha_II_-_The_Spawning_%28movie_poster%29.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 18 💬 1
We all know that
James Cameron is a master when it comes to making sequels. His films like
Terminator 2,
Avatar 2 and
Aliens are extremely good examples of how to make a sequel right. Unlike
Steven Spielberg that avoids sequels. Steven avoided doing the second
Jaws movie. James Cameron goes for it and wins. Speaking of Steven Spielberg's
Jaws, not only sequels from that film were produced. Rip-offs, like the 1978
Piranha by
Joe Dante also were produced. Those were parody material B-movie exploitation films. And so writer / director James Cameron decided to take the project of making a sequel to that
Jaws rip-off, with his 1982
Piranha II: The Spawning.
#Piranha2 #JamesCameron #horror #movies #review #film #cinemastodon
Super 8
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/74/Super_8_Poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 41 ❤ 1 💬 2
People accuse me of many bad things for making
a movie where kids go against their parents into dangerous situations. Apparently they never seen
Super 8. One criticism I hear often about
Super 8 is that the kids in this film are way too brave! No wonder
Steven Spielberg is attached to this project. He made and produced a fair share of anti-ageism films in his career.
A.I. Artificial Intelligence is the best film ever
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e6/AI_Poster.jpg/220px-AI_Poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 68 💬 2
This was the first time I've ever cried from a film. And that experience made me addicted, both to Steven Spielberg and
A.I. and also to watching films seriously. Taking in what the directors is trying to do. Letting the film overwhelm you. Letting it break you. And perhaps made me a better
filmmaker myself.
#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #StevenSpielberg #StanleyKubrick #Film #Review #Movies #Cinemastodon
Babylon
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/db/Babylon_2022_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 57
I would say that
Babylon, the 2022 film directed by
Damien Chazelle is Damien Chazelle's 1941. I wrote an article describing how
1941 is the ultimate Steven Spielberg movie and how there is a certain type of over the top insanity you can expect from a good filmmaker going completely unhinged. 1941 wasn't received well. People in the cinema were reportedly closing their ears from the shier amount of loud explosions that happened in the movie.
Babylon is the lowest rated movie from Damien Chazelle. But it doesn't mean that the movie is dull, or badly made. Both 1941 and
Babylon are explosive insanity-fests showcasing the ability of a good director to maintain focus in an absolute chaos. Both films are incredibly well directed. There are complex shots and interesting cuts all through out. But perhaps they had injected so much energy into the movies that the movies overdosed the audience. And therefor received worse reviews.
An American Pickle
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/54/An_American_Pickle_poster.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 64
Seth Rogen is an interesting filmmaker. Sometimes I feel like he is a manifestation of me when I will be older. But to be honest it's just wishful thinking. Wait for my review on The Fablemans to understand why. Seth Rogen is Jewish. He looks kind of big. Sometimes directs movies. He has Ukrainian ancestry. And he is a fighter for Freedom. Basically me. No... Wishful thinking. I don't think I will get anywhere near as popular. Basically
Spielberg. Yeah that's better.
The Psycho-Sexual analysis of Blender Dumbass
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/me_insane.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
🔐 3 👁 46 ❤ 5 🔄 2 💬 5
People change. People change! People grow. People adopt. People change their minds about things. People learn new things everyday. People form opinions. People change. And so have I. I notice something rather strange about people that come into contact with me without prior knowledge of what I do and how I think. I remember the other day on mastodon being bombarded with hate for seemingly no reason what so ever. I either said something good about Richard Stallman, or said something slightly too vague about one thing or another. I know I held opinions that I'm not proud of today. I know I probably have opinions right now that I will change in the future. People change.
Therefor I decided that it would be a good idea, both for the sake of my mental health and just as an example of said change, to talk to you about myself. To psycho-sexually analyze what I stand for. What I believe in. And most importantly: how I got to this point. How I changed to be where I am today. Yet, in a strange kind of way I am slightly afraid of strangers when it comes to my psychology. It is my private life, after all. And I don't want to reveal everybody everything about me. The good, the bad and the ugly. And then the ugly, the bad and the good. I don't want to give haters the platform to hate. So I suppose this is the perfect excuse to use the
fediverse gimmick I came up with, the other day. Basically you have to be at least somewhat of a fan of me and / or my work, in order for me to feel okay with sharing with you all this private, highly emotional, stuff. Don't worry about it. If you are a fan, this is going to be a piece of cake for you. The website will just check that you are, and everything is going to be okay. For everybody else, perhaps, this article isn't for you.
#biography #psychology #philosophy #story #sexuality #love #gnu #linux #computers #blender3d
The Inherent Instability Of Euphemisms
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/poop.png)
Blender Dumbass
👁 57
Often it is required of a storyteller to say less in order to say more. Steven Spielberg had to censor the most gruesome parts of the holocaust in order to make a movie that was actually watchable, and his intuition was arguably right. The movie ended up being a hit, exposing millions upon millions of people to the the holocaust. But it wasn't the horror. It was a watered down version, made so people would not be too upset watching it. The reality of the situation was so much worse that Spielberg didn't even think a movie showing the actual truth was possible. Nobody would be brave or masochistic enough, he thought, to actually see it. A similar story happened to Dunkirk, another World War II movie, this time by Christopher Nolan, who deliberately avoided the worst aspects of a war film to make a film which the audience could watch without taking their eyes from the screen, and as a result, a film that is arguably scarier because of that. Nolan's masterful management of tension is so good that the movie doesn't need violence and blood to be visceral. And yet, to some extent the movie is a watered down version of what war supposed to be. And some argue it is a lesser film because of it.
Carrie 1976 ... the psycho-sexual analysis
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d7/Carrieposter.jpg/250px-Carrieposter.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 40 💬 2
The 1970s are an interesting time when it comes to cinema history. It is the time after
the code was changed into the MPAA rating system ( allowing more violence, nudity and harsh language on the screen ) and yet before new blog-baster Hollywood was born. 1976's
Carrie by
Brian De Palma was already released after the 1974
Steven Spielberg sensation
Jaws. But still before
George Lucas broke the planet with his
Star Wars. Everybody knew the movies were intense at that time. Some of the most depressing shit came out at the 1970s. And with it, there was also
Carrie. A psycho-sexual revenge-tale about child-abuse.
#Carrie #BrianDePalma #StephenKing #film #review #horror #cinemastodon
Something Evil
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3a/Something_Evil.jpg)
Blender Dumbass
👁 83
Conceptually the film is very much like
Stanley Kubrick's "The Shinning". It deals with a parent going slowly insane and becoming a threat to the children. Both movies suggest a possibility of a supernatural explanation of the insanity. But the movies are made in such a smart way where there is enough doubt in those supernatural occurrences that you can read it as psychological deterioration only. Which is a very interesting challenge to a filmmaker. And young Spielberg pulled it off.