![[icon articles]](/icon/scene)
GPL doesn't make the program libre
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/KHYF0Z71AGCAID4L.png)
![[avatar]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/55NKGQKE7IRKMLHV.png)
TrolerI don't consider freedom binary, for me some things are inherently more free than others. Here I define freedom as the capacity to do a task unhindered. With such definition, it comes to be clear, what I mean by freedom not being binary and existing on an axis. For instance, repairing a standard PC is easier than the newest model of iPhone. This ease of repairability exists on a gradient, with the PC and iPhone being on different sides. The same applies to the actual binary, software world as well. It is easier to modify a program written in Python than the same one written in C. In Python there is no need to keep recompiling and seeing the changes, all alterations can be done on the fly.
"Open Source" vs "Free Software" the disagreement on Paternalism - take 2
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/freedom_vs_security.png)
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
Blender DumbassThere are two types of people. One type of people is following the ideas called "Open Source" and another one follows the ideas of "Free Software". There is a third concept that I will hope to explain in this article, called "Paternalism", that in my opinion is the dividing force between the two camps of people.
"Open Source" vs "Free Software" the disagreement on Paternalism
Blender DumbassBoth "open source" and "free software" mean, in terms of software itself, largely the same thing. The source code is published. The project is developed by a community of people. The project is forkable. Many pieces of software are both "free software" and "open source" in the same time. But when you dig into the details of their definitions, you start to see differences.
The Psycho-Sexual analysis of Blender Dumbass
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/me_insane.jpg)
Blender DumbassPeople change. People change! People grow. People adopt. People change their minds about things. People learn new things everyday. People form opinions. People change. And so have I. I notice something rather strange about people that come into contact with me without prior knowledge of what I do and how I think. I remember the other day on mastodon being bombarded with hate for seemingly no reason what so ever. I either said something good about Richard Stallman, or said something slightly too vague about one thing or another. I know I held opinions that I'm not proud of today. I know I probably have opinions right now that I will change in the future. People change.
Therefor I decided that it would be a good idea, both for the sake of my mental health and just as an example of said change, to talk to you about myself. To psycho-sexually analyze what I stand for. What I believe in. And most importantly: how I got to this point. How I changed to be where I am today. Yet, in a strange kind of way I am slightly afraid of strangers when it comes to my psychology. It is my private life, after all. And I don't want to reveal everybody everything about me. The good, the bad and the ugly. And then the ugly, the bad and the good. I don't want to give haters the platform to hate. So I suppose this is the perfect excuse to use the fediverse gimmick I came up with, the other day. Basically you have to be at least somewhat of a fan of me and / or my work, in order for me to feel okay with sharing with you all this private, highly emotional, stuff. Don't worry about it. If you are a fan, this is going to be a piece of cake for you. The website will just check that you are, and everything is going to be okay. For everybody else, perhaps, this article isn't for you.
A Thought Expeiment to Understand Sexual Abuse
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/become_adult.jpg)
Blender DumbassToday I have an interesting thought experiment for you about specifically the hot topic of 2025-2026: Child Sexual Abuse.
![[icon videos]](/icon/video)
PeerTube | Age Verification and Chat Controll are FUCKING STUPID!!!
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/ae71eb39-a0d7-4c82-abd7-046ce2b582f0.jpg)
Blender DumbassA rant about Age Verification and Chat control and Stuff.
Why Age Verification cannot work even for its intended use?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/same_age.jpg)
Blender DumbassShort answer People are stupid. But seriously, even though we have a lot of talk about why Age Verification laws are bad ( for human rights ) and how we can fight against them ( EFF just made a comprehensive guide on the issue ) nobody seems to realize the underlying logical fallacy, or multitudes of them, that even brought us to this point to begin with.
The Fractal of Consent
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/fractal_consent.jpg)
Blender Dumbass"Consent" is a word thrown around willy-nilly these days. And yet it feels like people don't really understand it. Some assume one thing while there is a different thing. Some assume another thing, while there is the one thing. And so on and so forth. Consent forms on websites and inside of apps. Sexual Consent. What the fuck is consent? Is it even real?
The Paradox of Tolerance is Real, Look at Israel
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/israel_tolerance.jpg)
Blender DumbassPeople like to pretend that everything is simple. That every problem has a straight forward, easy solution. That the paradox of tolerance is not real, because you could simply look at it a bit differently and it magically disappears, or something. People claim a soothing claim that all you need to do to make the paradox go away is to think of it as a "social contract". If you are not willing to tolerate, you are not tolerated. But I happened to live in Israel...
Humans are all fucking stupid
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/humans_dumb.jpg)
Blender DumbassNobody knows everything. The top scientists don't know everything. The science is incomplete. The Gödel's incompleteness theorems show that even something as basic as math ( which we rely on to understand the rest of the world ) is incomplete. And probably logically dubious as well. We can't know everything.
Don't Say "Illegal" When You Mean Wrong
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/illegal.png)
Blender DumbassI find a lot of articles and news sources today that word themselves very strangely. They point out something that is wrong with some political system or other, but they use the word "illegal" to mean wrong.
It's Better to Want It Than to Need It
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/want_it_dont_need_it.png)
Blender DumbassA lot of people claim that they need to use proprietary software, either for work or something else. And the question is. Do they consent to it, or the existence of a need makes it some sort of a power dynamic?
PeerTube | I fixed the Curbs | Exercise in Pointlessness | Dani's Race GTA Clone | UPBGE Blender 3D on GNU / Linux
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/6a7b9485-6740-4938-9834-782f3bc719c1.jpg)
Blender DumbassI'm punishing myself for being tired by doing a pointless work ( which ended up being only partially pointless ) on my GTA clone Dani's Race.
The Copyright Mentality
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/copyright_mentality.png)
Blender DumbassA large majority of people confuse privacy with data protection. And lately I'm noticing an uproar of ideologies that claim to be pro-freedom in one way or another, but which threaten freedom as a whole. I think there is a certain copyright mentality to them. Certain misunderstanding of ownership which makes fighting for freedom more complex.
Equal Rights to Kids
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/equal_rights_to_kids.png)
Blender DumbassThe main issue with freeing the kids, is that kids cannot vote. This is not un-doable. With slaves, slaves could not vote. But there were enough non-slaves that agreed that slaves should be freed. So it passed through. With women rights until some point in time women couldn't vote too. But there were enough men, who agreed with women. And now women can vote. Something like this has to happen with children's rights too.