Melancholia is the best Science Fiction Film Ever
👁 65
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/the_copyright_mentality : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/ : 👁 2
https://mastodon.social/ : 👁 3
https://mastodon.online/ : 👁 1
https://mastodeck.com/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews : 👁 3
https://mastodon.uno/ : 👁 1
https://toot.community/ : 👁 1
https://www.google.com/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=Melancholia&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
Information or opinions might not be up to date.
I don't think you think of Science Fiction often when thinking about Lars Von Trier. Yet, his 2011 masterpiece Melancholia is one of, if not the best, science fiction film(s) ever. c:0 ↩ Reply
The sci-fi premise is very simple: A rouge planet from outside of the solar system, flies by the planet Earth. And the main tension of the movie is whether it will collide with Earth or not. ↩ Reply
Yet Lars Von Trier spoilers the ending ( the collision with the planet Earth ) in the opening sequence. Which he himself described as a technique he used to force himself to make a better movie. If the audience already knows that everybody will die by the end, how does one still make the movie interesting? This is the question Lars Von Trier wanted to tackle with this movie. ↩ Reply
The film is structured in 2 chapters, about 2 different types of depression, or Melancholia, of 2 sisters: Justine, played by Kirsten Dunst and Claire played by Charlotte Gainsbourg. ↩ Reply
The first chapter is about Justine who suffers from what seems to be some sort of bi-polar disorder. And just so happened that depression part of it happened exactly on her wedding with Michael played by Alexander Skarsgård. Not to be confused with Stellan Skarsgård ( who is Alexander's father in real life ), who plays Justine's awful boss from work. And yes, Brady Corbet, the director of The Brutalist is playing the dumb nephew of said boss. That is the same Brady Corbet. Also Von Trier didn't forget to include John Hurt ( known for the Chestburster scene from the original Alien , and a good screen adaptation of 1984 ). Here he plays Justine's "stupid dad", that very likes young girls who's name is Betty. ↩ Reply
The first half of the movie could be looked at as a kind of sick black comedy from Von Trier. It plants the seeds for the sci-fi stuff. But it only mentions them in a very minimal way. Instead the film is portraying a wedding going very wrong very fast. From the absurd gag of a limousine being too long to fit into the driveway. To everything going absolutely sideways. Making, as a result, Justine's depression harder and harder on every next turn. ↩ Reply
Then Lars switches the sides. Suddenly it is Claire's turn to be emotionally devastated. Suddenly the sci-fi elements are at full swing. While in the same time, being closer and closer to apocalypse, Justine seems to be more and more at home. As if the depression made her be able to cope with apocalypse so much better than "normal" people. ↩ Reply
The sci-fi is also very tastefully done. On paper it's something like the infamous 2022 disaster by Roland Emmerich called Moonfall. But the execution is so much more thought through. Lars Von Trier does not leave the house setting. There are no scenes of the government deciding what to do. There are no Michael Bay heroes going to Nuke the asteroid. There is this presence in the sky. And it does things on Earth. c:1 ↩ Reply
At first it simply hides stars. Then it becomes a second moon in the night sky. Glowing bright blue. Then when it gets closer, it sucks some of the air, so the characters have trouble breathing. And in none of those scenes Von Trier forgets about the characters. All of it is about the characters. About their experience with the event. About their different view points. And ultimately about different ways they cope with the reality of it colliding with earth, pretty damn soon. ↩ Reply
While in the first half of the film, Von Trier showcases a weird sense of humor, while also showing great understanding of depression ( which he personally suffers from ). In the second half, Von Trier shows mastery of suspense. And a very great understanding of what makes science fiction work on some visceral level. ↩ Reply
Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply
Find this post on Mastodon
![[avatar]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/55NKGQKE7IRKMLHV.png)
Troler
c:0 April 17, 2026 I don't think you think of Science Fiction often when thinking about Lars Von Trier. Yet, his 2011 masterpiece Melancholia is one of, if not the best, science fiction film(s) ever.
⤴ ViewWas The Fifth Element in that list.
Troler
c:1 April 17, 2026 The sci-fi is also very tastefully done. On paper it's something like the infamous 2022 disaster by Roland Emmerich called Moonfall. But the execution is so much more thought through. Lars Von Trier does not leave the house setting. There are no scenes of the government deciding what to do. There are no Michael Bay heroes going to Nuke the asteroid. There is this presence in the sky. And it does things on Earth.
⤴ ViewBasically going the Lovecraft way.
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3a/Family_plot_movie_poster.jpg/250px-Family_plot_movie_poster.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f1/Piranha_II_-_The_Spawning_%28movie_poster%29.jpg)