Using Talmudic Techniques To Understand Free Software
👁 33
https://blenderdumbass.org/do_login : 👁 1
https://mastodon.online/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?author=on&text=blenderdumbass : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/ : 👁 4
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles : 👁 3
https://strangeminds.social/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/articles/using_talmudic_techniques_to_understand_free_software : 👁 1
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
by Blender Dumbass
Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
In the Wikipedia article about Talmud it says that: ↩ Reply
It records the teachings, opinions and disagreements of thousands of rabbis and Torah scholars.
↩ Reply
And if you know from books like Tanya which references the book of Nida on the first page, in the first paragraph, in the first sentence, you know that Talmud likes to link things Wikipedia style, and then argue those things, trying to find patterns. ↩ Reply
What could be the pattern in linking a Wikipedia article and then talking about Wikipedia in an article about using Talmudic Techniques to understand Free Software? Apart from the obvious thing that Wikipedia with its intensive linking resembles the intensive linking found in Talmud. c:0 ↩ Reply
Based on the Wikipedia article about the FSF's Free Software Awards the 2005 Social benefit award was given to Wikipedia itself. Yet if we look at the website of FSF themselves you would see that the Award was indeed given to Wikipedia, but not in 2005. It was given to Wikipedia on "Mar 29, 2006 12:00 AM". This is weird. And even weirder is the fact that the Wikipedia is not sighting anything to prove that it indeed got the Award. ↩ Reply
Then if you dig even deeper, the article about this specific award on FSF is not from 2005 and not from 2006 but instead is from 2011. Something here does not add up. ↩ Reply
For the sake of clarity, lets set this one conundrum aside for a little and focus on what seems to be a slightly more pressing issue. Which is the question of: why did Wikipedia even received a Free Software Award in the first place? ↩ Reply
The article about this award ( the one from 2011 ) states the following: ↩ Reply
This award is presented to the project or team responsible for applying free software, or the ideas of the free software movement, in a project that intentionally and significantly benefits society in other aspects of life.
↩ Reply
Does Wikipedia apply Free Software? Does Wikipedia apply the ideas of Free Software? And does Wikipedia intentionally and significantly benefits society? c:8 ↩ Reply
To answer this we need to first answer what Free Software even is. ↩ Reply
In the Wikipedia article about the Definition of Free Software it links to a GNU Bulletin Issue number 1 from which it references this piece of text: ↩ Reply
The word "free" in our name does not refer to price; it refers to freedom. First, the freedom to copy a program and redistribute it to your neighbors, so that they can use it as well as you. Second, the freedom to change a program, so that you can control it instead of it controlling you; for this, the source code must be made available to you.
↩ Reply
For this text to make sense we need an agreeable definition of what "freedom", "program" and "source code" mean. In the original bulletin the word "freedom" appears just 3 times and all of them in the same piece quoted by Wikipedia, which is also quoted above this paragraph by this article. This does define the "free" in "free software" to be more related to "freedom" and less related to the absence of price. But it does not define the word "freedom" itself. ↩ Reply
The word "program" appears 7 times. The first use is in the section about GNU Emacs, where it says: ↩ Reply
It is a fairly large program, around 525k on vaxes or 68000s, to which must be added space for the files you are editing, undo buffers, Lisp libraries loaded, and Lisp data such as recently killed text, etc.
↩ Reply
There appears to be no definition of what "vaxes" means, but it seems to be something related to size in kilobytes. Probably a way to store the program in Random Access Memory, since the paragraph later continues with: ↩ Reply
This is not really a problem on a timeshared machine because most of that 525k is shared, but on a personal computer there may be nobody to share with. Thus, GNU Emacs probably could not be used on an IBM PC clone for lack of memory, unless you want to implement virtual memory in software within Emacs itself. Perhaps on an 80286 with 1 meg of memory you can win using their memory management.
↩ Reply
Based on Wikipedia Time sharing means: c:1 ↩ Reply
In computing, time-sharing is the concurrent sharing of a computing resource among many tasks or users by giving each task or user a small slice of processing time. This quick switch between tasks or users gives the illusion of simultaneous execution. It enables multi-tasking by a single user or enables multiple-user sessions.
↩ Reply
I removed the references from this quote. Please refer to the original article for further references. c:2 ↩ Reply
So it seems like on an old type time-sharing mainframe computer ( which were the size of buildings, and offered terminals to the users ) Emacs would not be a problem. Since those computers had at least 525k bytes of random access memory at any given point. And all users were effectively using the same memory. But on more modern "micro-computers" which were smaller and had only 1 terminal, this could be a waste, unless you have something like a "1 meg" ( which probably means 1 megabyte of RAM ). ↩ Reply
Yet it seems like this discussion about the size of Emacs ( while interesting in the context of various people calling Emacs bloated ) is not helping us much with understanding the meaning of the word "program". Apart from maybe the fact that a program takes memory. ↩ Reply
Then we have the 2 uses of the word "program" that the Wikipedia article about the definition of Free Software quotes. We have another mention of a program being large with a C compiler, ( probably some early version of GCC ). Finally under the section titled "Some Arguments for Gnu's Goals ↩ Reply
" Richard M. Stallman writes this: ↩ Reply
Schools will be able to provide a much more educational environment by encouraging all students to study and improve the system code. Harvard's computer lab used to have the policy that no program could be installed on the system if its sources were not on public display, and upheld it by actually refusing to install certain programs.
↩ Reply
This might be a clue to the whole definition of Free Software. And this also might be a clue to the definitions of "program" and "source code". For instance the fact that it says "no program could be installed on the system if its sources were not on public display" suggests that "sources" or "source code" ( which we know from the short discussion about memory, could mean the same things, one being a short version of another ), must be a quality, or something related to a "program". ↩ Reply
If instead we will look at the Wikipedia definition of a Computer Program we will find this description: ↩ Reply
A computer program is a sequence or set of instructions in a programming language for a computer to execute.
↩ Reply
As we know in the English language the word "sequence" is a fancy way to mean a list. We could argue that a "program" is a list of instructions. A check-list of sorts. And what a computer does, when running said program, is executing those instructions one by one in a sequence. But most importantly, a program is apparently implemented in a "programming language". ↩ Reply
If we look what Wikipedia has to say about "programming language" we find out that it is: ↩ Reply
an engineered language for expressing computer programs.
↩ Reply
And that it: ↩ Reply
typically allow software to be written in a human readable manner.
↩ Reply
"Typically", but apparently not always. If we look back at the article about Programming Languages we have a clue to try to describer it a bit more. ↩ Reply
Execution of a program requires an implementation. There are two main approaches for implementing a programming language – compilation, where programs are compiled ahead-of-time to machine code, and interpretation, where programs are directly executed.
↩ Reply
"Machine code", "Directly Executed"? So we have one way to make a program that requires "compilation" and another way that doesn't not require it. That apparently is "human readable" all the way through. ↩ Reply
If we look at the definition of "Source Code" specifically, because that is what we want to know, to define Free Software, on Wikipedia, we find this explanation: ↩ Reply
In computing, source code, or simply code or source, is human readable plain text that can eventually result in controlling the behavior of a computer.
↩ Reply
First of all this confirms the theory we had earlier about "source" being a shortened way to say "source code". Then we see something interesting. This source code is a "human readable" text. Presumably source code and the human readable program is the same thing. ↩ Reply
So is the following true: There are two types of software. Human Readable, source code, software, that is executed directly. And there is non-human readable machine code software. But how did machine code software was made if it isn't human readable? ↩ Reply
If we look at a definition of a Compiler which is linked to on Wikipedia, at the word "compilation". We find the following definition: ↩ Reply
In computing, a compiler is software that translates computer code written in one programming language (the source language) into another language (the target language). The name "compiler" is primarily used for programs that translate source code from a high-level programming language to a low-level programming language (e.g. assembly language, object code, or machine code) to create an executable program.
↩ Reply
So we can simplify it, and say that all machine code, at least when it comes to software made by humans, must have been compiled from human readable source code. The end result is this machine code that the computer can run, but that a human cannot read. That the human cannot understand. And that would be hard for the human to make changes to. But there is always this other form of the same program. Same list of instructions. The source form. The form with which this program was made. The one that the human can read. The one that the human can understand. And the one that the human can change. ↩ Reply
Let's use this new understanding of ours to decipher the meaning of the paragraph we looked at earlier: ↩ Reply
The word "free" in our name does not refer to price; it refers to freedom. First, the freedom to copy a program and redistribute it to your neighbors, so that they can use it as well as you. Second, the freedom to change a program, so that you can control it instead of it controlling you; for this, the source code must be made available to you.
↩ Reply
The idea here suddenly is much clearer. In order to have this "freedom" you must have the source code. Because without this source code you cannot see what the program does. You don't see the list of instructions. And you cannot edit said list of instructions so the program does what you want it to do. If you want to have freedom you must be able to "control it instead of it controlling you". From which we can also interpret a meaning of the word "freedom". ↩ Reply
Freedom is when you control yourself instead of somebody else ( or something else ) controlling you. ↩ Reply
From the same bulletin, this following quote seems to enforce this idea of freedom. And also clarify the idea of Free Software: ↩ Reply
Complete system sources will be available to everyone. As a result, a user who needs changes in the system will always be free to make them himself, or hire any available programmer or company to make them for him. Users will no longer be at the mercy of one programmer or company which owns the sources and is in sole position to make changes.
↩ Reply
If we look at the modern definition of Free Software on GNU's website we would see the following 4 requirements for the program to be free: ↩ Reply
- The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0). ↩ Reply
- The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this. ↩ Reply
- The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2). ↩ Reply
- The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this. ↩ Reply
Except not everything is clear. Some of those rules seem redundant. In the definition of Free Software on Wikipedia ( again ) we see this quote: ↩ Reply
A fourth freedom was later introduced to explicitly affirm the user's right to run the program. Because it was seen as more fundamental than the others, it was placed first. Since the existing freedoms were numbered one through three, this new one was designated "freedom zero".
↩ Reply
Okay. This explains why we count from zero. But why add this freedom in the first place? Isn't source code all you need to get the program under user's control? ↩ Reply
The mention of this on Wikipedia links to a footnote in the definition of Free Software on GNU's website. The one we took the list of the four freedoms from. Said footnote reads differently. c:5 ↩ Reply
The reason they are numbered 0, 1, 2 and 3 is historical. Around 1990 there were three freedoms, numbered 1, 2 and 3. Then we realized that the freedom to run the program needed to be mentioned explicitly. It was clearly more basic than the other three, so it properly should precede them. Rather than renumber the others, we made it freedom 0.
↩ Reply
Why did they need to mention it explicitly? ↩ Reply
If you dig through the definition on the GNU's website, it provides clarifications for all 4 freedoms on the list. The clarification for freedom zero is this: ↩ Reply
The freedom to run the program as you wish means that you are not forbidden or stopped from making it run. This has nothing to do with what functionality the program has, whether it is technically capable of functioning in any given environment, or whether it is useful for any particular computing activity.
↩ Reply
From this statement alone, we can reason that not all programs allow the user to run the program as the user wishes. Not all programs allow the user to execute the list of instructions it has for the computer, for any purpose the user wants to execute these instructions? This sounds silly... Why would this be true? ↩ Reply
If we look further, under the title "Legal considerations" we find the following text: ↩ Reply
In order for these freedoms to be real, they must be permanent and irrevocable as long as you do nothing wrong; if the developer of the software has the power to revoke the license, or retroactively add restrictions to its terms, without your doing anything wrong to give cause, the software is not free.
↩ Reply
Okay. Now we need a definition of the word "License". On Wikipedia the article for License states: ↩ Reply
A license is granted by a party (licensor) to another party (licensee) as an element of an agreement between those parties.
↩ Reply
So a license is a fancy way to say "agreement" or "consent". ↩ Reply
Under "Mass licensing of software" in the same article, the following text clarifies the use of licenses when it comes to software ( computer programs ) in particular: ↩ Reply
Mass distributed software is used by individuals on personal computers under license from the developer of that software. Such license is typically included in a more extensive end-user license agreement (EULA) entered into upon the installation of that software on a computer. Typically, a license is associated with a unique code, that when approved grants the end user access to the software in question.
↩ Reply
From this whole thing we can deduce that the software is not "accessible" to the user, apparently even if the user had a copy, automatically. And that the user, legally speaking, must have the consent of the developer to use the program. ↩ Reply
If look at the designated article on Wikipedia about software licenses. We see that: ↩ Reply
Since the 1970s, software copyright has been recognized in the United States. Despite the copyright being recognized, most companies prefer to sell licenses rather than copies of the software because it enables them to enforce stricter terms on redistribution.
↩ Reply
Let's quickly define "copyright" to understand it correctly. In the Wikipedia article about copyright we can read this: c:6 ↩ Reply
A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the exclusive legal right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time.
↩ Reply
So, if software has copyright, the author of the software, the developer who holds the copyright, has the exclusive legal right to do anything meaningful with this program. Including running it. Which means that the developer is the one in control and therefor the developer controls the user. So the user has no freedom, unless the developer gives up his control over the software. Which is done by consenting to giving it up. Or in other words, by licensing the software such that it grants the 4 freedoms to the user legally. ↩ Reply
From this we learn that "Free Software" is not just a practical matter. It is both practical and legal matter. For the practical matter you must have source code. So you could practically, meaningfully control your software. And for the legal matter you have to have a good license that comes with the software, so when you are controlling your software, when you are exercising your freedom, you would not be punishable by law. ↩ Reply
This, by the way, explains why on GNU's website in the article called Words to avoid they pledge people to avoid saying "Intellectual Property": ↩ Reply
The term “intellectual property” carries a hidden assumption—that the way to think about all these disparate issues is based on an analogy with physical objects, and our conception of them as physical property.
↩ Reply
If people think of copyright as "freedom" because copyright gives the authors the control over the work they made, as if to say, this work is author's property of some kind, it by default defeats the whole idea of being able to control your software. If the software developer's control comes over the control of the user, we concentrate power at the developer level and practically have no freedom at the user level. ↩ Reply
Having power over somebody is distinct, in this case from having freedom. Freedom is when you control your copy. Power is when you control other people's copy. Therefor thinking of copyright as "freedom" does not make sense. Thinking of work as "intellectual property" does not make sense. Those are not instruments for freedom. Those are instruments for power. And instruments for power need to be defeated in order to have freedom. In a way thinking about a license as "consent" here does not make sense either. The consent should be the other way around. Using a piece of software without source code and a proper Free Software license should require a consent by the user, because that's who's freedom is at stake here. Not providing source code and a Free Software license to a user that does not consent to be restricted like this, is therefor a form on an injustice. c:7 ↩ Reply
That in my opinion gives us a satisfactory idea of the meaning of Free Software. So now we can finally answer the question from the beginning of this article. ↩ Reply
Does Wikipedia apply Free Software? Does Wikipedia apply the ideas of Free Software? And does Wikipedia intentionally and significantly benefits society? c:8 ↩ Reply
Based on how much we can learn from just Wikipedia ( and things it links to ) about complex topics such as Free Software ( as exemplified by this very article ) we can conclude that it indeed significantly benefits society. ↩ Reply
Based on the fact that every article on Wikipedia is under a proper Free Software license we can conclude that it does apply the ideas of Free Software. ↩ Reply
And based upon the fact that Wikipedia runs on MediaWiki software that has its source code available and that includes a Free Software license with it ( making the software Free ), we can conclude that Wikipedia applies Free Software as well. c:9 ↩ Reply
All 3 categories are checked in. Granting Wikipedia the Free Software Award. ↩ Reply
But because Wikipedia is so Talmudic at its core ( as you probably realized by now ), and because it it Talmudic probably by applying the ideas of Free Software. We can suggest a theory: ↩ Reply
Richard Stallman is not thorough because of some neuro-divergence or syndrome. Richard Stallman is thorough because he is Jewish. c:11 ↩ Reply
Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply
Find this post on Mastodon
![[avatar]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/55NKGQKE7IRKMLHV.png)
Troler
c:0 March 07, 2026 What could be the pattern in linking a Wikipedia article and then talking about Wikipedia in an article about using Talmudic Techniques to understand Free Software? Apart from the obvious thing that Wikipedia with its intensive linking resembles the intensive linking found in Talmud.
⤴ ViewWas that a rhetorical question? If so, then why did you half answer it?
Troler
c:1 March 07, 2026 Based on Wikipedia Time sharing means:
⤴ ViewAre you talking about software freedom, Emacs or Time Sharing?
... replies ( 2 )
Blender Dumbass
c:3 March 07, 2026@Troler This is a Talmudic technique. I must try to understand everything to get to the ultimate truth.
Troler
c:2 March 07, 2026 I removed the references from this quote. Please refer to the original article for further references.
⤴ ViewI would you to actually go this rabbit hole ad nauseam
Blender Dumbass
c:3 March 07, 2026... c:1
@Troler This is a Talmudic technique. I must try to understand everything to get to the ultimate truth.
Troler
c:5 March 07, 2026 The mention of this on Wikipedia links to a footnote in the definition of Free Software on GNU's website. The one we took the list of the four freedoms from. Said footnote reads differently.
⤴ ViewYou say Footnote?!
Troler
c:6 March 07, 2026 Let's quickly define "copyright" to understand it correctly. In the Wikipedia article about copyright we can read this:
⤴ ViewMy head is spinning, it feels like I am reading a law where the most rudimentary words are defined.
Troler
c:7 March 07, 2026 Freedom is when you control your copy. Power is when you control other people's copy
⤴ ViewAll freedom is related to property. I have freedom to do what I want with my body, my corporeal property. No one has the right to sexual property without my consent -- rape. No one has the right to take anyone's property of life -- murder.
Troler
c:8 March 07, 2026 Does Wikipedia apply Free Software? Does Wikipedia apply the ideas of Free Software? And does Wikipedia intentionally and significantly benefits society?
⤴ ViewWait... the whole article was about whether Wikipedia utilized principles of Free Software? I seemed to have blacked out by reading all those definitions of words I know.
Troler
c:9 March 07, 2026 And based upon the fact that Wikipedia runs on MediaWiki software that has its source code available and that includes a Free Software license with it ( making the software Free ), we can conclude that Wikipedia applies Free Software as well.
⤴ ViewAnd anyone can fork and modify all Wikipedia articles
- some are restricted, to prevent vandalism.
Troler
c:11 March 07, 2026 Richard Stallman is not thorough because of some neuro-divergence or syndrome. Richard Stallman is thorough because he is Jewish.
⤴ ViewHe is an autistic Jew.
Cinnamon chair paper harbor bridge doormat blanket? Nectarine window barnacle bridge blanket turnip lantern barnacle!
...a random musing...
spicy opinion
Nectarine freckle pebble hazelnut branch chair? Goblet cupboard carpet branch freckle carpet corridor river lamp sparrow. Bucket nectarine sparrow lamp quince basket chair barnacle!
- river teaspoon blanket- thimble parsnip feather
- bridge feather quince
Cinnamon goblet cupboard lagoon river! Stone harbor corridor garden carpet feather river kettle.
saffron branch bridge doormat copper
Moustache pillow nectarine sparrow nectarine pebble bridge paper mountain. Marmalade kettle goblet garden saffron acorn cinnamon! Forest lamp feather moustache lagoon bridge walnut! Acorn mountain forest moustache pillow goblet freckle parsnip. Mountain carpet velvet garden cushion.
Forest meadow lantern copper cushion turnip mountain lantern harbor river. Parsnip river apple engine acorn carpet attic orchid. Copper carpet forest cupboard carpet nectarine umbrella moustache blanket blanket. Blanket quince mountain marmalade.
basket porridge bridge stone
Trousers teaspoon feather nectarine parsnip kettle forest river river eyelid? Bucket nectarine quince porridge marmalade candle turnip apple stone barnacle. Mountain candle river doormat quince carpet. Stone orchid goblet lamp lagoon engine freckle feather carpet walnut. Copper sparrow cellar carpet porridge feather?
- moustache cupboard pebble- porridge forest cushion
- shadow basket window- moustache blanket lantern
Lagoon feather corridor cushion corridor saffron meadow freckle curtain. Mountain teaspoon quince river walnut doormat cellar goblet hazelnut. Hazelnut cabbage cushion river basket meadow quince.
- velvet walnut thimble- copper marmalade paper
- porridge radish pebble
Branch cloud corridor goblet radish window walnut quince cushion! Garden parsnip goblet harbor umbrella. Cellar lantern barnacle radish carpet harbor! Barnacle pillow lamp forest bucket.
basket garden corridor parsnip river
food talk
Stone lamp acorn goblet moustache cloud! Bridge river goblet feather blanket feather teaspoon. Turnip carpet pillow umbrella bucket nectarine turnip! Nectarine stone basket umbrella marmalade thimble cellar nectarine. Harbor copper orchid bucket forest walnut lagoon blanket?
long post
Quince hazelnut feather hazelnut pillow radish quince cupboard copper bridge! Barnacle feather meadow stone meadow garden blanket quince cupboard bucket. Copper blanket paper porridge turnip candle lamp lagoon! Cinnamon saffron carpet copper mountain garden saffron lamp copper. Porridge kettle cinnamon river cloud harbor corridor orchid.
link 85
spicy opinion
Cabbage parsnip orchid bridge branch bucket trousers candle freckle goblet. Lagoon curtain walnut river kettle copper! Hazelnut lantern goblet porridge! Apple harbor paper barnacle radish walnut. Turnip umbrella carpet velvet.
barnacle bucket saffron turnip
long post
Cupboard lagoon turnip curtain cupboard copper parsnip corridor. Parsnip pebble corridor stone forest attic goblet meadow lantern marmalade. Copper sparrow cushion harbor engine!
meadow freckle lagoon hazelnut eyelid
Garden moustache bridge engine blanket copper harbor garden barnacle! Cinnamon marmalade trousers bridge saffron.
...a random musing...
silly humor
River umbrella apple mountain curtain lagoon pebble branch. Candle radish blanket blanket orchid lamp copper curtain? Meadow river paper engine chair porridge sparrow moustache goblet. Trousers pebble kettle doormat trousers velvet eyelid corridor basket quince.
...a random musing...
Copper copper pebble pillow barnacle sparrow! Blanket curtain harbor umbrella pillow teaspoon cinnamon lagoon freckle orchid! Cupboard moustache lamp walnut orchid bucket. Teaspoon pillow saffron teaspoon stone porridge! Shadow barnacle attic cellar?
thimble apple mountain doormat
Nectarine goblet copper radish. Branch acorn hazelnut forest meadow chair goblet? Curtain garden kettle cellar. Quince curtain attic lantern candle umbrella cabbage hazelnut quince. Cinnamon marmalade lantern chair cupboard trousers cellar.
mild rant
Teaspoon stone cinnamon feather harbor kettle? Marmalade lantern shadow orchid forest. Paper lantern candle nectarine nectarine attic apple saffron freckle harbor?
- basket velvet nectarine- mountain hazelnut hazelnut
tangent
Marmalade mountain eyelid river. Cloud walnut lagoon cabbage.
thimble forest turnip copper branch
Lantern saffron cinnamon eyelid barnacle. Nectarine trousers copper basket pillow attic lantern paper stone! Carpet thimble basket turnip. Bucket sparrow engine shadow bucket garden bridge teaspoon doormat basket. Thimble cabbage carpet marmalade goblet feather orchid.
...a random musing...
Barnacle harbor engine cabbage orchid. Feather moustache saffron harbor harbor cushion candle pillow cloud moustache. Hazelnut cupboard cloud cellar lantern cushion blanket harbor chair stone.
random noise
Blanket turnip saffron corridor freckle cupboard cabbage? Garden bridge parsnip quince. Quince kettle radish apple cupboard!
goblet saffron parsnip cellar
Orchid acorn river trousers corridor marmalade window cinnamon! Hazelnut goblet cloud quince cinnamon parsnip apple mountain branch. Lamp lagoon acorn acorn cabbage basket carpet shadow! Branch garden quince saffron lantern lamp turnip walnut window.
- freckle chair eyelid- porridge carpet eyelid
- orchid thimble attic- nectarine window bridge
Forest turnip harbor goblet meadow! Window acorn branch velvet.
attic basket cupboard corridor hazelnut
Bridge corridor lagoon hazelnut walnut marmalade pillow stone bridge. Garden cushion meadow curtain umbrella river corridor velvet orchid carpet. Mountain moustache velvet pillow barnacle cinnamon curtain hazelnut?
...a random musing...
Turnip apple orchid corridor attic. Attic cushion marmalade blanket branch? Engine moustache meadow copper stone corridor mountain basket acorn hazelnut? Kettle forest cloud stone attic barnacle. Turnip trousers branch mountain chair paper mountain eyelid.
meadow pillow eyelid basket velvet
Lagoon candle feather moustache pebble turnip. Doormat window cabbage walnut copper shadow engine garden corridor. Corridor window turnip saffron river. Marmalade shadow trousers barnacle?
freckle marmalade attic attic
Velvet pillow umbrella goblet lantern nectarine lantern pillow cabbage! Mountain acorn blanket shadow stone cellar bridge eyelid branch marmalade. Parsnip lantern river river! Lagoon velvet cupboard parsnip paper engine feather moustache kettle. Cinnamon pebble forest bucket carpet window eyelid!
Barnacle parsnip mountain teaspoon kettle umbrella barnacle saffron. Sparrow doormat cushion stone attic attic curtain cabbage lamp marmalade. Forest pillow cellar umbrella. Goblet candle orchid trousers. Blanket corridor barnacle marmalade attic quince velvet moustache copper?
link 83
Meadow teaspoon cinnamon freckle velvet goblet stone kettle? Blanket curtain parsnip chair eyelid forest candle lamp? Saffron marmalade forest copper kettle.
...a random musing...
Attic marmalade window freckle cellar window forest cabbage saffron. Window pebble moustache kettle cellar blanket? Lantern shadow blanket eyelid forest window curtain window cloud?
- harbor turnip kettle- hazelnut nectarine acorn
- copper chair quince
Cinnamon bucket shadow lagoon trousers freckle cabbage. Walnut curtain thimble thimble blanket mountain velvet. Goblet teaspoon moustache freckle copper engine orchid mountain stone?
Stone cupboard goblet blanket cabbage. Pebble teaspoon attic cinnamon? Pebble goblet engine cellar acorn garden bucket stone bucket?
random noise
Nectarine curtain branch bridge cellar branch quince parsnip lamp freckle. Hazelnut cabbage moustache apple lagoon eyelid copper apple lamp? Meadow shadow meadow lamp!
window basket orchid quince moustache
Cabbage cloud corridor thimble branch orchid lantern shadow sparrow meadow. Cloud shadow saffron window teaspoon feather moustache? Eyelid meadow parsnip carpet cushion walnut cabbage. Attic meadow lagoon cushion garden parsnip porridge bridge porridge!
cellar harbor thimble blanket window
long post
Sparrow turnip saffron forest nectarine freckle. Candle teaspoon pebble thimble cellar. Velvet nectarine eyelid lagoon. Bridge shadow quince walnut walnut nectarine eyelid! Freckle copper mountain cellar lantern garden.
Shadow meadow pillow pebble lagoon cellar branch. Freckle barnacle stone paper kettle apple sparrow harbor. Meadow cabbage cellar basket? Branch quince freckle stone shadow! Quince cinnamon cinnamon cabbage branch saffron shadow velvet window!
- parsnip goblet cellar- mountain cushion mountain
- quince lagoon carpet
Lantern pebble mountain lamp walnut basket attic marmalade bridge hazelnut. Turnip acorn turnip branch radish goblet!
link 95
Saffron forest freckle forest. Cellar cushion attic acorn turnip carpet chair. Basket kettle turnip garden.
apple attic lagoon copper
Orchid barnacle sparrow river velvet goblet. Acorn branch lamp marmalade.
cabbage cupboard bridge sparrow
Basket sparrow cellar moustache river moustache forest hazelnut. Barnacle chair garden garden branch sparrow teaspoon shadow! Barnacle meadow cupboard turnip feather branch bucket copper copper. Blanket cellar lamp saffron feather goblet? Basket lamp umbrella quince bridge acorn thimble turnip paper!
- bucket goblet goblet- barnacle trousers corridor
- teaspoon corridor quince- umbrella window doormat
food talk
Paper bucket copper marmalade walnut acorn copper corridor? Walnut acorn river bucket cabbage sparrow? Pillow walnut river cabbage cushion.
- velvet carpet apple- sparrow lantern nectarine
- cupboard lagoon attic
musing
Walnut umbrella umbrella umbrella corridor basket thimble velvet. Doormat barnacle goblet walnut turnip turnip eyelid engine apple. Curtain window pebble moustache kettle!
mountain branch hazelnut nectarine
Saffron garden freckle porridge river marmalade. Radish velvet corridor candle.
link 67
Lantern engine mountain cloud cellar mountain! Garden cushion forest marmalade pillow walnut quince. Paper radish kettle attic branch teaspoon saffron engine. Thimble window shadow hazelnut lagoon cellar lagoon copper mountain.
marmalade cushion copper saffron
Lagoon walnut teaspoon acorn meadow orchid cabbage branch! Garden meadow goblet kettle. Forest goblet trousers cushion cinnamon pebble.
forest river turnip meadow
Nectarine marmalade lamp cloud harbor umbrella shadow meadow? Kettle radish lagoon barnacle carpet? Garden branch mountain window nectarine. Carpet sparrow cabbage candle corridor forest curtain. Doormat kettle sparrow quince harbor porridge cabbage!
Mountain eyelid pillow branch pillow attic nectarine? Copper candle orchid marmalade candle pebble. Cupboard goblet carpet moustache forest. Barnacle porridge freckle umbrella blanket lamp umbrella marmalade blanket candle. Blanket sparrow lantern goblet cupboard bridge trousers mountain.
feather pillow thimble bridge teaspoon
Moustache parsnip cinnamon cabbage branch bucket sparrow turnip cloud velvet. River apple eyelid parsnip carpet garden. Sparrow basket cellar basket branch copper umbrella engine? Candle engine pillow kettle blanket shadow. Bridge hazelnut garden river teaspoon?
- copper barnacle river- bridge candle cushion
- stone feather window- attic trousers cloud
Cabbage corridor copper quince cushion pillow window stone porridge freckle? Apple marmalade curtain pebble cloud chair lamp river. Stone acorn forest bridge parsnip basket sparrow!
...a random musing...
Cushion parsnip forest lamp nectarine orchid cupboard umbrella! Bucket attic candle pebble umbrella? Mountain engine lantern kettle cabbage porridge! Bucket hazelnut barnacle velvet.
- shadow corridor orchid- lagoon nectarine candle
- cupboard apple apple
Cushion acorn engine apple? Basket candle stone mountain? Blanket cellar marmalade velvet? Parsnip corridor pillow sparrow moustache radish basket stone. Chair copper hazelnut corridor.
musing
Cushion mountain cloud velvet engine acorn forest cloud moustache! Hazelnut engine basket attic eyelid cinnamon harbor bridge teaspoon! Chair engine nectarine basket copper.
link 73
Cinnamon cushion meadow parsnip walnut attic apple? Moustache barnacle bucket corridor. Lamp kettle copper doormat orchid sparrow eyelid feather.
link 19
Engine turnip goblet lagoon basket garden. Feather garden orchid walnut stone corridor.
Carpet feather meadow cabbage quince copper sparrow parsnip. Chair quince moustache eyelid quince walnut chair! Cloud barnacle doormat thimble! Acorn cabbage quince corridor trousers. Cupboard marmalade cushion engine river attic umbrella lamp.
link 26
Walnut goblet cellar kettle saffron apple. Cinnamon hazelnut lantern garden pillow paper bridge.
Thimble radish saffron cellar parsnip pebble branch! Pillow garden feather umbrella velvet marmalade teaspoon sparrow stone bucket! Quince lamp cabbage lamp. Doormat teaspoon nectarine walnut basket. Goblet shadow marmalade hazelnut lantern blanket?
random noise
Mountain lantern pebble pebble eyelid attic cupboard chair teaspoon? Paper copper parsnip orchid trousers! Nectarine orchid freckle lamp orchid orchid apple engine turnip. Goblet cinnamon eyelid lagoon.
Mountain sparrow bucket apple lagoon feather copper nectarine. Window pebble paper chair mountain turnip goblet bucket river cloud!
saffron cabbage copper freckle cushion
Bridge cupboard curtain attic? Apple attic corridor cloud harbor eyelid harbor corridor blanket?
food talk
Cabbage copper lamp bucket moustache sparrow. Mountain moustache porridge saffron. Apple pillow engine nectarine? Trousers meadow apple attic orchid feather thimble quince copper.
- sparrow mountain cupboard- shadow marmalade umbrella
- walnut acorn sparrow- copper trousers cupboard
Feather bucket apple cushion feather river apple cupboard window radish. Hazelnut lagoon sparrow eyelid cabbage curtain apple meadow pebble. Quince quince thimble blanket garden window meadow cushion branch!
bucket cabbage orchid freckle bucket
Saffron paper freckle curtain apple candle corridor curtain thimble paper. Branch forest pebble porridge copper curtain. Parsnip velvet freckle engine corridor candle cabbage harbor cellar. Quince blanket branch hazelnut window eyelid porridge mountain! Goblet quince apple teaspoon lagoon cellar paper candle.
Attic cinnamon eyelid harbor velvet sparrow. Window freckle kettle cabbage doormat kettle forest? Orchid feather cushion mountain pillow! Corridor moustache turnip hazelnut chair blanket!
cloud lamp parsnip acorn lamp
Acorn thimble radish basket mountain cabbage doormat nectarine cloud attic. Stone stone paper saffron freckle. Goblet barnacle lagoon walnut kettle curtain meadow bucket cupboard. Eyelid river copper velvet trousers cupboard attic blanket harbor. Carpet attic branch bucket cushion apple window walnut freckle pebble.
...a random musing...
musing
Porridge candle attic marmalade cinnamon candle copper cushion. Blanket teaspoon freckle branch?
link 9
tangent
Candle lamp branch cupboard marmalade harbor. Paper forest cloud curtain curtain carpet lantern acorn. Chair parsnip thimble window?
- velvet bucket moustache- nectarine parsnip lantern
Umbrella quince cupboard teaspoon walnut kettle shadow. Freckle cloud lantern corridor?
garden bridge freckle branch
Nectarine branch forest engine moustache acorn moustache chair. Mountain bridge cabbage cushion harbor cabbage teaspoon goblet attic engine. Attic lagoon branch pillow. Kettle candle moustache cabbage feather carpet? Moustache kettle hazelnut window cinnamon parsnip river paper!
lamp branch radish saffron
Cushion walnut mountain barnacle feather pebble river. Barnacle carpet garden window trousers cushion radish porridge sparrow teaspoon? Feather cloud marmalade basket porridge thimble trousers. Trousers cupboard pebble lantern carpet copper hazelnut. Quince curtain kettle doormat meadow?
orchid harbor copper acorn trousers
Pillow acorn hazelnut branch pillow cloud chair branch branch? Meadow feather blanket apple pillow cushion. Walnut garden shadow velvet cushion. Barnacle quince basket hazelnut acorn branch bridge orchid. Chair feather engine blanket chair umbrella pillow cellar!
- sparrow marmalade bucket- umbrella nectarine thimble
Copper nectarine sparrow cushion cabbage cinnamon! Freckle forest forest sparrow stone thimble carpet cupboard! Sparrow feather cinnamon candle window copper cupboard freckle?
Meadow candle moustache cloud pillow shadow branch eyelid doormat pillow! Parsnip basket meadow bucket paper lamp bucket mountain velvet! Corridor sparrow barnacle harbor cloud. Teaspoon orchid copper freckle. Freckle lamp forest sparrow apple lamp trousers shadow!
acorn marmalade hazelnut teaspoon
Forest thimble attic thimble! Mountain lagoon acorn radish nectarine goblet river? Parsnip kettle doormat lamp porridge lamp cushion candle turnip corridor.
moustache shadow attic nectarine
Cushion radish doormat bucket feather acorn nectarine paper! Moustache garden porridge corridor marmalade! Attic cinnamon window cupboard lantern. Pebble trousers cinnamon feather kettle moustache stone cloud branch!
link 63
Meadow teaspoon attic shadow paper eyelid stone mountain? Bridge bucket mountain candle! Branch turnip freckle blanket. Pillow doormat meadow freckle harbor hazelnut!
- chair lantern eyelid- meadow cellar meadow
Lamp umbrella saffron hazelnut cinnamon! Curtain shadow apple mountain garden? Parsnip marmalade saffron sparrow. Garden forest quince shadow orchid eyelid feather doormat. Walnut harbor saffron garden teaspoon turnip window trousers copper kettle?
- paper lantern candle- nectarine cabbage basket
Shadow forest stone orchid saffron engine. Sparrow pebble cellar river lantern bucket!
...a random musing...
Orchid curtain river pebble teaspoon attic carpet window window saffron? Kettle feather pebble meadow engine basket orchid candle doormat cushion.
- cabbage acorn corridor- moustache window basket
- attic walnut bridge
Thimble walnut porridge bucket parsnip shadow marmalade! Quince doormat orchid saffron eyelid hazelnut? Window bridge lantern orchid radish cinnamon lantern copper lagoon orchid? Parsnip doormat attic carpet cabbage bucket marmalade radish moustache saffron? Curtain turnip cellar cupboard acorn garden engine paper.
...a random musing...
Copper hazelnut candle kettle basket cellar teaspoon! Chair cushion cloud cupboard meadow doormat cabbage stone cloud.
Marmalade bucket apple bucket pillow blanket! Stone freckle parsnip bucket pillow goblet shadow moustache.
radish meadow chair barnacle
Turnip quince curtain freckle porridge apple lamp garden corridor. Cellar basket candle parsnip curtain bridge garden lantern thimble.
thimble moustache nectarine cabbage
Garden cloud kettle chair goblet cupboard moustache? Moustache cellar trousers carpet mountain forest? Chair cushion walnut corridor radish orchid blanket! Candle harbor lantern paper bucket pebble? Basket lamp engine cellar engine doormat teaspoon cellar lagoon?
Radish basket attic freckle radish candle meadow window curtain. Pillow bucket blanket nectarine meadow. Lamp cushion trousers window radish cushion engine doormat. Lantern meadow branch acorn teaspoon feather forest pillow forest goblet? Goblet sparrow freckle pebble shadow forest saffron radish.
trousers acorn porridge walnut mountain
tangent
Harbor cloud lamp mountain quince harbor teaspoon basket. Radish velvet chair umbrella hazelnut lantern pillow! Paper parsnip marmalade window branch?
Saffron freckle nectarine basket nectarine curtain moustache! Trousers curtain bridge doormat sparrow curtain umbrella freckle thimble pebble. Lamp quince cushion pillow engine hazelnut lamp goblet apple chair. Acorn cloud sparrow lagoon moustache radish window feather stone. Cupboard copper hazelnut parsnip bucket carpet.
- velvet sparrow bridge- trousers thimble chair
- engine lamp stone- doormat attic blanket
random noise
Orchid nectarine barnacle velvet feather marmalade forest! Freckle teaspoon orchid chair. Thimble barnacle velvet bridge bridge.
- basket moustache cabbage- pillow river turnip
- blanket trousers nectarine- cabbage shadow pillow
Engine kettle trousers lantern lagoon? Stone attic cinnamon pebble velvet lagoon garden paper stone? Curtain harbor trousers bridge candle cushion parsnip thimble lantern turnip. Lamp basket stone cloud saffron. Cushion quince marmalade cushion meadow cloud paper!
Nectarine shadow moustache meadow nectarine window. Lagoon apple carpet barnacle.
branch lagoon basket cupboard garden
Saffron radish cabbage mountain? Moustache velvet lagoon engine chair window doormat apple goblet. Eyelid velvet doormat corridor basket paper barnacle cushion candle chair!
bucket carpet engine barnacle branch
Stone saffron saffron river blanket branch cloud carpet harbor. Orchid lamp cloud sparrow acorn cellar copper attic basket cellar? Corridor orchid doormat carpet marmalade thimble copper! Trousers feather curtain pillow window nectarine garden saffron?
...a random musing...
Blanket walnut stone barnacle quince umbrella curtain barnacle basket turnip! Cloud bridge meadow bucket? Sparrow feather porridge feather doormat river freckle.
velvet engine radish saffron
Engine lamp cushion cloud pillow engine. Teaspoon curtain meadow lamp harbor. River pebble marmalade velvet! Pebble sparrow kettle moustache goblet!
cinnamon branch lamp eyelid marmalade
Blanket saffron kettle orchid chair. Umbrella meadow lantern bucket window barnacle attic walnut! Radish trousers moustache apple garden candle!
link 61
Cloud pebble kettle cupboard lamp curtain attic? Harbor moustache quince lantern acorn trousers thimble acorn saffron pebble.
link 88
Freckle saffron bridge nectarine radish chair harbor stone velvet branch? Branch shadow feather cloud candle basket. Hazelnut kettle carpet meadow engine. Blanket paper shadow velvet bridge doormat stone!
velvet corridor lagoon stone
Copper moustache carpet porridge feather. Feather lantern cushion barnacle harbor cabbage apple!
link 33
Orchid cupboard orchid radish. Basket candle doormat moustache cupboard kettle pillow. Mountain thimble basket velvet walnut freckle pillow blanket pillow doormat. Mountain corridor engine chair freckle carpet goblet. Lamp garden window doormat velvet engine.
goblet river velvet eyelid meadow
Lantern bucket barnacle goblet branch attic? Attic carpet shadow apple moustache? Meadow window saffron stone. Parsnip eyelid freckle trousers barnacle meadow radish velvet?
link 76
Nectarine blanket lantern quince turnip saffron radish cushion parsnip. Blanket cinnamon window engine garden cinnamon saffron doormat. Apple cushion cushion teaspoon freckle turnip kettle cupboard harbor? Window cushion forest moustache lagoon.
Basket acorn velvet walnut parsnip branch. Acorn paper umbrella cupboard river corridor moustache. Teaspoon harbor cupboard bridge mountain!
freckle harbor bucket branch
Quince freckle attic doormat. Thimble pebble bucket engine feather bridge candle. Paper goblet eyelid corridor.
food talk
Acorn candle meadow apple. Nectarine copper sparrow umbrella bucket.
...a random musing...
Candle carpet shadow engine cellar bridge. Blanket nectarine velvet blanket!
link 59
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/e0d0e17f-84bb-4d51-b44f-b113b97c517f.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/where_you_draw_line.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/minifree_gaming.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/c07756b1-ce79-4c8a-ab26-056704c77915.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/hope.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/6a7b9485-6740-4938-9834-782f3bc719c1.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/freedom_vs_security.png)
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/663d6dec-4e70-4e78-b513-a8f29526964e.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/btfree.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/windows_lock.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/get_access_fedi.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/danisrace_2024-09-25_released.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/money_stats.png)
![[thumbnail]](https://peer.madiator.cloud/lazy-static/thumbnails/38a01a44-7857-4664-80bd-f076dd4e6142.jpg)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/KHYF0Z71AGCAID4L.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/jerry_interview.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/money_problem.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/rms_too_extreme.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/fork.png)
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/danisrace/2026-06-15/banner.jpg)