by Blender Dumbass Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".
I made 3 short films which amount to pretty much nothing in the end of the day. Apart of select few, nobody heard about any of them. And because I worked on them pretty much just by myself, alone, I did not get any useful connections. Which in the end of the day puts me in a weird position. I know I can make a movie. I know the shots and the lenses and the technical stuff. But nobody would ever believe me. Which means I'm at the same playing field as other beginner film-makers.
↩ Reply Yet somehow film-makers stop being nobodies and become somebodies. There is always the first film. There is always something that puts you under the spotlight, allowing you to make the movie you've always wanted to make. Let's look at those first films and how they got to be made. And analyze the patterns. And hopefully find a clue of what to do ourselves.
↩ Reply
The first film Steven Spielberg directed as a cinema picture was an extravagant chase film The Sugarland Express from 1974. It had thousands of extras, hundreds of police cars, and it looked and felt like a proper Spielbergian epic of the time.
↩ Reply Yet 1974 was not when Spielberg suddenly appeared out of nowhere in Hollywood.
↩ Reply The first documented case of Spielberg ever directing something ( according to wikipedia ) would be The Last Gun from 1959 ( 15 whole years before that ).
c:1↩ Reply And that is if we don't count multitudes of child-hood films he did as a very young little Steve. But The Last Gun or the child-hood little projects ( even though useful to build skill in film-making ) aren't much of a help when it comes to getting a 3 million dollar budget ( of 70s money ) to shoot an extravagant chase film.
↩ Reply In 1969 Steven Spielberg directed a part of a pilot episode of a TV show called Night Gallery which was produced by Universal. How the hell, a young 21 year old Jewish boy who made little funny videos with his sisters, suddenly directs a TV episode?
c:2↩ Reply There is a very noticeable gap in between those two things.
↩ Reply According to a lot of sources, what won him a contract with Universal was a little 1968 short film called Amblin written, directed and edited by Steven Spielberg. Yet produced by a little known producer called Denis C. Hoffman, who's friend provided 2/3 of the $15,000 budget used to shoot the short-film.
↩ Reply Hoffman was a beginner producer himself and saw potential in Spielberg. They made this movie to kick-start Spielberg. And signed a contract, where Spielberg agreed to direct at least one Hoffman's project sometime in the future. Which means that by the time of Amblin at least this small producer already saw Spielberg as a talented enough film-maker, to do such a thing.
↩ Reply How does one get from nobody to being recognized as talented enough for this sort of thing?
↩ Reply If we look back even further we could see a few little clues to how it all went about. First would be the 1967 unfinished short film by Spielberg called Splitstream. He ran out of money shooting this film. So it was never done. Yet... Even here we have a problem. One of the cast, presumably the main character, is played by Tony Bill a Hollywood actor, working in the industry since 1959. By that time Tony Bill already worked alongside Hollywood icons like Frank Sinatra and Steve McQueen. If he agreed to be in a small short film by Steven Spielberg, Steven Spielberg must have been good enough at at least something by that point.
↩ Reply If we look even further, we arrive the 1964 feature length movie Spielberg shot for just $500, with his childhood pals - Firelight. The producers for this film were his own parents. And the cast was comprised of students of the acting class in the school he went to.
↩ Reply Somehow between Firelight and Slipstream Steven Spielberg became known enough by the people in the industry, to try to make something.
↩ Reply In the biography of Steven Spielberg by Joseph MacBride we learn that Spielberg handed out the Universal lots a lot after his family moved to California. ( He shot Firelight in Arizona ). He was denied application to UCLA film-school. And so, out of desperation he would sneak into the Universal pictures and would try to find what he could do.
↩ Reply According to the biography he ended up volunteering for a lot of projects. And soon became somewhat of a recognizable face there. He probably had few chances here and there to show Firelight to people in Universal. Which ended up creating a reputation for Spielberg as a young aspiring talented film-maker lad. Which presumably lead to him making a short film with Tony Bill, and then another short film with Denis C. Hoffman. And which also explains why the first company that ended up actually hiring him for real was Universal.
↩ Reply Then through a lot of very good TV work on Night Galery ( 1969 ), Columbo and Duel ( 1971 ), Something Evil ( 1972 ), Savage ( 1973 ) and a lot of stuff in between, he proved himself to be a very talented guy worth betting something like 3 million dollars on. That is how The Sugarland Express was born. And then the next thing he did was fucking Jaws.
↩ Reply So let's condense it. What did Spielberg do?
↩ Reply He made a lot of movies as a kid. That lead him to know what to do when making Firelight. Then he proved to be a useful guy by sneaking to Universal and helping who he could. Until he could show them his Firelight movie. Which in turn made him able to meet and work with some of the people from the industry. Even if on small projects without much commercial potential. Those projects ( because they were tangentially connected to the industry ) were enough to prove industry people that they could take chance on him, in small TV related situations. And through doing good work in that regard, he proved that he could be bet on to make a cinema picture. The rest is history.
↩ Reply
Everybody knows the inspirational story of the first James Cameron film The Terminator. How he had the best script in the world. How he pitched this script to everybody. And how everybody rejected the script when he insisted on being the director. Everybody knows of a small producer that took a bet on Cameron and bought the rights to the script for $1. But not a lot of people know that Cameron's first cinema film was not in fact The Terminator. It was fucking Piranha II from 1982.
↩ Reply
↩ Reply But even before Piranha II James Cameron was already in the industry for some time. Mainly he worked in effects. For example he painted some of the Matt-Paintings for John Carpenter's 1981 film Escape From New York.
↩ Reply So by the time he made Piranha II and by the time he and his Terminator script were rejected by everyone, he already was a part of the industry. But how the hell did he got there in the first place?
↩ Reply It seems like the story, when it comes to James Cameron, starts with Xenogenesis. A small short film he co-directed with a buddy of his Randall Frakes, that they made on $20,000 in 1978.
↩ Reply The story goes something like this. Cameron read anything he could read on film-making in the library. Learning about how cameras and optical printers worked. Then ( when George Lucas made StarWars ) Cameron was able to get a bunch of dentists, seeking a tax write-off, to give him and his buddy $20,000. And using this they made a movie called Xenogenesis.
↩ Reply Somehow ( which is unclear ) Roger Corman ( a big B-movie producer ) got to see Xenogenesis and was impressed enough to hire James Cameron.
↩ Reply How? How and why did Roger Corman saw Xenogenesis? Well, perhaps it was because Corman was constantly on the lookout for anybody who could work cheaply and produce something of B-Movie quality for him. Being a small, unknown, nobody, with a pretty impressive film on a technical side, was something Roger Corman would probably be looking for anyway.
↩ Reply And so he hires James Cameron as a model maker and then a full art director for his Star-Wars knock-off picture Battle Beyond The Stars 1980.
↩ Reply But if you look at the Wikipedia entry for Battle Beyond the Stars under "Visual effects and art direction" you will see the following quote:
↩ Reply
He was recommended by long-time working partner and future wife Gale Anne Hurd, who was at the time working for Corman.
↩ Reply So Cameron knew Gale Anne Hurd personally in 1978? And she happened to know Roger Corman? And ( if you know anything about The Terminator ) she ended up being the one that bought the script ( for The Terminator ) for $1.
In a way, James Cameron happened to know the right people at the right time. He made his Xenogenesis at the moment right after Star Wars because he could bullshit a bunch of dentists that he might be able to make a knock-off Star Wars movie.
↩ Reply This was then used by Gale Anne Hurd to pitch Cameron to Corman, for his own knock-off Star Wars movie.
↩ Reply Obviously if Cameron didn't have any talent, this whole intrusion operation would not have worked. But it wasn't just Cameron who made James Cameron. It wasn't just that he wrote a banger script and got to make it right away. There was a complicated multi-year strategy to the whole ordeal between Cameron, Hurd and whoever else that helped them pull this off.
↩ Reply
The first theatrical motion picture by the legendary director Michael Bay was the 1995 buddy-cop comedy Bad Boys. But as you already guessed by this article, he didn't just make Bad Boys out of nowhere.
↩ Reply Before Bad Boys for half a decade, Michael Bay was working for the Propaganda Films studio, producing music videos and commercials alongside other film-makers like: Zack Snyder, David Fincher, Michel Gondry, Spike Jonze, Dominic Sena, Simon West and Gore Verbinski, just to name a few.
↩ Reply Pretty much every single one of those directors owes their Hollywood carriers to Propaganda Films. Like Roger Corman in the 70s, Propaganda Films in the 90s, was a stepping stone, for young film-makers right out of the film-school. But instead of doing cheap B-Movies, they made A-material for the same low budget: Music videos and commercials. This gave the ability for the film-makers to experiment on their craft, and ultimately transition from short-form to long-form motion pictures.
↩ Reply In a way, Michael Bay went the safest route toward becoming a film-maker. He worked for a bit as an intern for a Hollywood company in the 1980s. Doing boring, uninteresting, but valuable jobs ( like filing storyboards ). Which then lead to him being accepted into a film-school. And from there he was pretty much directly hired by the producers at Propaganda Films.
↩ Reply
It is widely known that the first picture made by Quentin Tarantino was Reservoir Dogs 1992 that he made from his own script for less than $3 million.
↩ Reply Similarly to people like James Cameron and Steven Spielberg, Quentin Tarantino did not go to a proper film-school. And instead made short films on his own money with friends. One of which My Best Friend's Birthday is partially survived. But that doesn't mean that he didn't do any professional film learning either.
c:4↩ Reply In the 80s, Tarantino spent some time learning how to act in James Best Theatre Company where he met many of the co-stars of his short-films. About the same time he and another film-maker Roger Avary ( who co-wrote Pulp Fiction with Tarantino ) worked at a movie rental store called Video Archives.
↩ Reply By 1988 he already had small roles on TV, like at one point he played an Elvis impersonator. Which got him access to some people in the industry.
↩ Reply Based on his own testimonials in various interviews he did over the years, via different channels ( some of which were customers of Video Archive and some of which he met through the TV gigs ) he ended up script-doctoring, making alterations to movie scripts, to make them better, for actual produced films.
↩ Reply This lead him to write Natural Born Killers and True Romance in hopes of directing one of those films. But he couldn't sell the scripts if he would be a director. Natural Born Killers was later directed by Oliver Stone ( who hired somebody else to do a re-write, making Tarantino angry ). And True Romance was subsequently directed by Tony Scott.
↩ Reply At one point he met with a young producer Lawrence Bender to whom he mentioned an idea for a dialogue based, ultra-cheap, heist film, that later became Reservoir Dogs.
↩ Reply As you can see, Tarantino didn't just write a banger script and was magically handed $3 million to prove himself. He had a long journey from Video Archives, through the acting classes and self-funded short films, through small TV roles and script-doctoring and multiple failed movie projects, until he got to a point where an ultra-cheap idea of his was something that could be risked on by the producers.
↩ Reply By chance he was also fucking Quentin Tarantino, so his script did become something that people wanted to do. With or without him. And after Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction there was absolutely no way you could stop the shier force that is Quentin Tarantino.
↩ Reply
If there is anything you can learn from those examples, is that, people don't just trust other people out of the blue. You submit a spec-script. Chances are you will be over-looked, or utterly dismissed, and most-likely dismissed outright. Most companies don't even want to read unsolicited work.
↩ Reply The only chance you have in the industry is to become solicited. If they don't need a writer, they might need an actor. If they don't need an actor, they might need an extra. If they don't need an extra they might need a technician, or at worst a janitor, or something.
↩ Reply Just being a janitor on set, though, does not help you. You cannot just say that you want to do something. You should be able to show the people that you already did something. Being on set is having conversations with staff, with heads of departments, occasionally with directors and producers. And if the moment is right and you can show them your Firelight you may get a chance to do something a bit bigger. You wont immediately jump to the super-stardom. But you will pave your way towards it.
↩ Reply Happy Hacking!!!↩ Reply
The first documented case of Spielberg ever directing something ( according to wikipedia ) would be The Last Gun from 1959 ( 15 whole years before that ).
In 1969 Steven Spielberg directed a part of a pilot episode of a TV show called Night Gallery which was produced by Universal. How the hell, a young 21 year old Jewish boy who made little funny videos with his sisters, suddenly directs a TV episode?
Similarly to people like James Cameron and Steven Spielberg, Quentin Tarantino did not go to a proper film-school. And instead made short films on his own money with friends. One of which My Best Friend's Birthday is partially survived. But that doesn't mean that he didn't do any professional film learning either.
3 times in a raw I self-financed a movie. All 3 I'm Not Even Human, The Package, The Car & The Time Is Running Out and Moria's Race were made on, what I consider to be, zero budget. It's a lie. Nothing costs zero. It's just it costed me small enough amount that I didn't even needed to calculate it. But now with my next movie project slowly moving into "Development Hell" I need to take budgeting seriously.
Somehow film-makers stop being nobodies and become somebodies. There is always the first film. There is always something that puts you under the spotlight, allowing you to make the movie you've always wanted to make. Let's look at those first films and how they got to be made. And analyze the patterns. And hopefully find a clue of what to do ourselves.
Quentin Tarantino stated that a quality of a film is measured in how well it corrupts the audience, showing as an example the 1971 Don Siegel film Dirty Harry where the main character ( a cop ) is trying to catch a psychopathic serial killer, which leads him into breaking the rules, because of the nature of the threat. He basically throws the civil liberties out of the window to catch the motherfucker, because otherwise the motherfucker is uncatchable. Which makes the audience for a moment, share that idea, and have a reason all of a sudden to not give basic human rights to bad people. Some people called this movie a "Nazi Propaganda Piece" but it is undeniable, the movie succeeded at corrupting its audience and therefore it is a picture of a great quality.
Listen, I do not know how describe the movie. Besides the obvious fact that it is the most Spielberg Spielberg can ever Spielberg. It starts off with people in the boxing ring, from the first perspective. Which is quite queer to me, since in school there was a special event, when...
A lot of people know James Cameron as the director that makes the best films. But a lot of those people don't realize that his films aren't actually the best. I would always consider Steven Spielberg a far better director. And people like Aaron Sorkin or Quentin Tarantino far better writers, than James Cameron. His movies are not even the hardest out there. Just take Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo, for example. But, that said, a lot of people still have this elevated idea of James Cameron. An idea that makes him a lot of money. So how does he do that?
In December of 2025, my neighbor, Quentin Tarantino finally released Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair. The film that was originally meant to be, but that was unfortunately cut into two volumes upon its original release, 2 decades ago. Therefore for this review I will be treating Volume 1 and Volume 2 as one film, even though it has a rather substantial intermission in its not-directors-cut version. Re-experiencing the story of the Bride and her revenge, for this review, filled me with some rather profound questions. Questions that I believe I started asking in my review of Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood. Questions as to: what is the meaning of Kill Bill?
Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary at some point in their early film-maker lives came up with a bunch of tiny little stories that they wanted to develop into movies. And one day a stroke of genius struck these two. Those little stories could be told together as one film, with interconnected characters. Quentin took off with the concept and wrote the final script. And then took off with said final script and made the movie itself. A movie that a lot of people consider to be one of the greatest masterpieces ever made. Yet, with that, re-watching it for this review, it struck me how amateurish the movie feels, despite its greatness.
One of things that slightly annoyed me on this re-watch...
In my review of Michael Bay's Bad Boys II I brought up an interesting theory people have about the film. The amount of Bayhem! it holds in could be a direct response to the out-of-the-comfort-zone feel Bay must have had experienced making Pearl Harbor. Basically, the film was so different from what Bay usually does, he had to crank the next movie's Bayhem! up to 11, to make it feel right again. After Robert Rodriguez directed Alita: Battle Angel with an estimated budget of about $200 million, he had to come back to his comfort-zone too. And 3 months later ( that same year in 2019 ) he released Red 11. A micro-budgeted horror film made on almost exactly $7,000.