![[icon articles]](/icon/scene)
Where do you draw the line? ( of Software User Freedom )
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/where_you_draw_line.jpg)
![[avatar]](/pictures/favicon.png)
Blender DumbassAn article by Troler about Libre Software made me remember an email conversation I had with Richard Stallman the other day. I suggested to have a sort of freedom ladder analogue, to encourage non-libre software developers to, at least, move closer towards user-freedom. I thought ranking software based on how close they are at achieving user-freedom. How close they are to being Libre. If they have source code published, but no license. This is still better than having no source code published at all. Stallman firmly stood his ground against my idea, claiming that anything less than Libre, anything less than software that grants all 4 essential freedoms to the user, is automatically not good enough. But then in that article by @Troler I saw something interesting. Maybe merely granting the 4 essential freedoms, might be not good enough, either.
I bled for this Blender 3D Model
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/building_108.jpg)
Blender DumbassTelling a story of the difficulties I went through to model this one building in Blender. The cringe, and the trauma and all of the bleeding in between.
GPL doesn't make the program libre
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/KHYF0Z71AGCAID4L.png)
![[avatar]](/pictures/user_upload/Troler/55NKGQKE7IRKMLHV.png)
TrolerI don't consider freedom binary, for me some things are inherently more free than others. Here I define freedom as the capacity to do a task unhindered. With such definition, it comes to be clear, what I mean by freedom not being binary and existing on an axis. For instance, repairing a standard PC is easier than the newest model of iPhone. This ease of repairability exists on a gradient, with the PC and iPhone being on different sides. The same applies to the actual binary, software world as well. It is easier to modify a program written in Python than the same one written in C. In Python there is no need to keep recompiling and seeing the changes, all alterations can be done on the fly.
"Open Source" vs "Free Software" the disagreement on Paternalism - take 2
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/freedom_vs_security.png)
Blender DumbassThere are two types of people. One type of people is following the ideas called "Open Source" and another one follows the ideas of "Free Software". There is a third concept that I will hope to explain in this article, called "Paternalism", that in my opinion is the dividing force between the two camps of people.
"Open Source" vs "Free Software" the disagreement on Paternalism
Blender DumbassBoth "open source" and "free software" mean, in terms of software itself, largely the same thing. The source code is published. The project is developed by a community of people. The project is forkable. Many pieces of software are both "free software" and "open source" in the same time. But when you dig into the details of their definitions, you start to see differences.
Anthony Zone ( Fireside Fedi ) is avoiding to interview Richard Stallman out of fear
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/tony_scared_stallman.png)
Blender DumbassDespite having all of the opportunities to interview Richard Stallman himself, Anthony Zone, known as Ozoned, tiptoed around him.
So Did Avatar 3 Use AI?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/avatar_ai.jpg){kind=avatar}
Blender DumbassWhile James Cameron has denied that Avatar 3: Fire and Ash used any generative AI. On January 24, 2026 Joe Letteri ( the visual effect supervisor from Weta Digital ) sat with the Corridor Crew for their weekly show of VFX Artists React where he said that the facial animation for the hero characters for both Avatar 2 and 3 involved a neural network. A neural network? Isn't that a fancy way to say "AI"?
The Psycho-Sexual analysis of Blender Dumbass
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/me_insane.jpg)
Blender DumbassPeople change. People change! People grow. People adopt. People change their minds about things. People learn new things everyday. People form opinions. People change. And so have I. I notice something rather strange about people that come into contact with me without prior knowledge of what I do and how I think. I remember the other day on mastodon being bombarded with hate for seemingly no reason what so ever. I either said something good about Richard Stallman, or said something slightly too vague about one thing or another. I know I held opinions that I'm not proud of today. I know I probably have opinions right now that I will change in the future. People change.
Therefor I decided that it would be a good idea, both for the sake of my mental health and just as an example of said change, to talk to you about myself. To psycho-sexually analyze what I stand for. What I believe in. And most importantly: how I got to this point. How I changed to be where I am today. Yet, in a strange kind of way I am slightly afraid of strangers when it comes to my psychology. It is my private life, after all. And I don't want to reveal everybody everything about me. The good, the bad and the ugly. And then the ugly, the bad and the good. I don't want to give haters the platform to hate. So I suppose this is the perfect excuse to use the fediverse gimmick I came up with, the other day. Basically you have to be at least somewhat of a fan of me and / or my work, in order for me to feel okay with sharing with you all this private, highly emotional, stuff. Don't worry about it. If you are a fan, this is going to be a piece of cake for you. The website will just check that you are, and everything is going to be okay. For everybody else, perhaps, this article isn't for you.
Introducing the Fediverse Fandomhood Gimmick
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/get_access_fedi.jpg)
Blender DumbassAn article or so ago I wrote about a gimmick I had in mind to gamify the Fediverse a little bit. I wanted to encourage people to like / boost and comment things on the fedi.
Today this gimmick is already fully implemented.
Did Petitions Fail? How AI ruined it? A new Fediverse gimmick?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/fa.jpg)
Blender DumbassTalking about why Petitions failed. And thinking up a new idea of how to gamify engagement on the Fediverse.
Is clarity in action a bad thing?
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/CGI_cars_michael_bay.jpg)
Blender DumbassI often hear how good action film-making is always clear and easy to follow. Camera isn't shaking like crazy and editing isn't filled with ADHD mania. Yet the more I think about it the less this makes sense.
A Thought Expeiment to Understand Sexual Abuse
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/become_adult.jpg)
Blender DumbassToday I have an interesting thought experiment for you about specifically the hot topic of 2025-2026: Child Sexual Abuse.
We need to start Forking Software more!
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/fork.png)
Blender DumbassAs pointed out in my last article, the developers of UPBGE ( a game engine I use for my game ) decided to include slop-code into the software. And starting with version 0.5 it is "tainted by Ai". After that post I found a small repository on codeberg, which lists various other programs that are also sloppy. At first I sunk in with the feeling of dread and a desire to give up. Even the Linux Kernel was mentioned.
But then...
UPBGE ( the blender game engine ) is now AI slop
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/upbge_ai.png)
Blender DumbassUPBGE 0.5 release notes state that Ai was used to write the code.
Part 3: Developing a Way to do Action Scenes Without Money
![[thumbnail]](/pictures/thumbs/cgi_vfx_part3.png)
Blender DumbassSince the last post in this series the project I've been working on became way more ambitious. The original problem I was trying to solve, was figuring out how to use computer graphics ( mainly Blender ) to cut costs for an action scene in a movie I'm developing. It has cars, so the idea was to try to render some CG cars into real life footage. You can go read Part 2 to see my attempts at this sort of thing.