[icon ] blenderdumbass . org [icon star] Reviews
LIVE! Working on Dani's Race ( Road Rage ) | The Insane LibRe Open World RaGe Racing Game [icon peertube] Watch!

Minority Report

October 13, 2023

👁 61

https://yandex.ru/ : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews?page=9 : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/objects_in_the_rear_view_mirror_may_appear_closer_than_they_are_1994_makes_me_want_a_2_michael_bay_musical : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews?page=15 : 👁 1
https://blenderdumbass.org/search?text=Minority&title=on&author=on&post=on&description=on&comments=on&tags=on : 👁 1

[avatar]by Blender Dumbass

Aka: J.Y. Amihud. A Jewish by blood, multifaceted artist with experience in film-making, visual effects, programming, game development, music and more. A philosopher at heart. An activist for freedom and privacy. Anti-Paternalist. A user of Libre Software. Speaking at least 3 human languages. The writer and director of the 2023 film "Moria's Race" and the lead developer of it's game sequel "Dani's Race".


From 3 years ago.
Information or opinions might not be up to date.


16 Minute Read



I reviewed a lot of films on this website and in almost every review I mention the name of Steven Spielberg. It's not because every movie I review is made by Spielberg. But it seem like every director can be viewed on a scale of Spielbergness. And the higher you go on that scale the better. At the top there is Steven Spielberg himself. c:0 c:1 c:2 ↩ Reply

The 2002 movie Minority Report that he did starring Thomas Cruise Mapother IV, commonly known as Tom Cruise, is a very interesting movie. It's one of those rare Spielberg films where the main character is not an ordinary person, so to speak. While somebody like Roy from Close Encounters is not even connected to the main event of the movie, making the event seem larger than life. In this movie the hero is one of a key people of the event. Even though the event is still epic in scope. ↩ Reply

The story of this film was written originally by Philip K. Dick. And while somebody like Ridley Scott preferred to adopt his "Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?" into Blade Runner. Spielberg's interests were more aligned with his "The Minority Report". ↩ Reply

As we all know, Spielberg is a political man. He made a number of highly political films throughout his career. And most of them have rather similar messages. You can think of Spielberg as one of the hackers. A person similar to Richard Stallman. A person in pursuit of Freedom. Yes, Spielberg has an iPhone and makes most of his money from copyright. But perhaps he was never presented with a political aspects of movements like the Free Software Movement. So maybe we should all write to him or his agent darian.lanzetta@caa.com about Richard Stallman, in hopes that he will make a huge biopic about the man ( and maybe even release the movie under a Free license, who knows ). ↩ Reply

Spielberg's political movies are dramas for the most part. And even if the movie has some kind of violence or action, those movies do not try to be flashy about it because they tackle real life problems. Minority Report is different since it's pretty much a high energy action thriller, that is set in future. And the reason for this is that Minority Report acts in the same way something like Orwell's 1984 does. It's a story of potential future that is very bad and should not happen. But while Orwell describes the world in his book in such dark tones that you are obviously going to hate all of it. Minority Report is more subtle. c:3 ↩ Reply

Spielberg was a very good friend of Stanley Kubrick before Kubrick died. And Kubrick had a very interesting political movie that he made in the 70s called A Clockwork Orange where he did something very controversial, but something that was worth trying to do. The film is about how cruel the criminal-detention systems could be. And while other films already existed that already criticized those systems, Kubrick was not satisfied. Most of the stories of how the system could be cruel revolves around a like-able protagonist being mistaken for a criminal. He or she didn't commit the crime. Or if they did, they did it for a very good cause and they are very good people inside. Or something like this. And therefor you should question the system because... look: an good person is being badly treated. c:4 ↩ Reply

But if you think about it, this is not what the discussion is about. Criticizing criminal-detention systems is criticizing their treatment of all criminals. How ever terrible those criminals would be. And therefor in A Clockwork Orange Kubrick specifically chose the main character to be an awful human being. So that the moral question would be proper. It's about treatment of criminals. Not about treatment of innocent people mistaken to be criminals. ↩ Reply

Minority Report does the same trick. There is this system of futuristic police that makes all murders almost impossible. And it's done by looking into the future. The police has precogs, people with an ability to predict murders. And the police stops those murders before they even take place. A "good idea" on the surface. But with a lot of human rights implications. The police in the movie literally arrests people that didn't commit any crimes. Because the police is able to arrest them right before they do so. But the movie doesn't make it sound like some kind of a terrible idea. Even though it is a criticism of the idea and throughout the film you learn a lot about why it's bad. The movie still shows precrime actually working and doing good things. So you are properly conflicted about the subject as an audience member. ↩ Reply

In the beginning of the film it's presented in such a way that you would start to agree with precrime, then the movie questions the integrity of the system. It question the morality of the system. It goes into various ways to either rig the system against those who people in charge do not like. Or for people in charge to hack it, so they could still commit murders. And so on. It's unfolding as a good political thesis. ↩ Reply

On top of that, the movie also tackles themes like problems with back doors in self driving cars and mass surveillance. The film famously has tech on every corner where ads are being shown to people on the street based on who they are. Similar to what we have today with various surveillance online and in our phones. Which also allows the law enforcement to track the movement of every person everywhere. In the film it's bit different than the current reality. They use eye scanners there. So there is also different privacy techniques that people need to use to avoid surveillance. In the real world there is Tor or other types of electronic security. In the world of Minority Report there are surgeons that can swap your eyes to new ones, which will fool the scanners. c:5 ↩ Reply

Films like Kimi tackle similar types of political views. But Kimi is more of a part of the Snowden Effect. Minority Report was released in 2002. A decade before Snowden said anything to the press. Which a lot of people think has something to do with the 9/11 attack instead. After the attack the amount of mass surveillance in the US skyrocketed. And some people claim that the film is trying to address those issues. But, if you really look at the dates, the film was finished filming before 9/11. And the project was developed through the entire decade before that. Meaning Spielberg already had views on mass surveillance, even before it became a real problem. It kind of reminds me Richard Stallman again. Because he was fighting against surveillance and other digital mistreatment way before Snowden and way before 9/11. And he had a very good time, probably, saying "Told you" when Snowden revealed everything to the press. Would be interesting to see a movie about Stallman from Spielberg. You know: darian.lanzetta@caa.com is a good place to mail this idea to. c:6 ↩ Reply

Okay let's focus on the movie itself. The writing in Minority Report is beyond awesome. Spielberg likes to not write anything himself. He probably knows how cheesy his dialogue sometimes could be. So he hires often multiple writers for different qualities in them. He might hire the main writer to do most of the script. And then hire a few people that are good with, say, specific type of humor, or good with writing expositional dialogue. And use all of them as "brushes" on his story canvas. And this makes extremely good scripts. Even reading the final script for Minority Report is awesome and interesting. c:7 ↩ Reply

There are a lot of little details in the movie that Spielberg glosses over in just the right way, to make the movie so much more re-watchable. I saw this film countless times. And every time I see it I notice more details that I haven't noticed before. How do you make something like this? ↩ Reply

Directing-vise it is one of the best directed movies ever. The shots! Oh my god! The shots! The camera work is fucking fantastic! The flow! Oh my god! The flow! The editing and the way the movie was shot for the editing is flawless. A lot of people say that the best cut in the film history is in Lawrence Of Arabia, or something. No! The best cut is in Minority Report. I would not spoil it too much. But it's towards the end, when it cuts to Agatha, played by Samantha Morton being lowered back to the precog bed, by Wally, played by Daniel London. It's so good. This one cut made me realize that directing is not only about basic coverage of the scene. But every little move matters. c:8 ↩ Reply

Spielberg likes to dirty up the frame a lot. So do not expect it to look pretty in the normal terms. The world is bleak both thematically and visually. There is a funny quote from Wikipedia on this subject: ↩ Reply

Cinematographer Janusz Kamiński shot with high-speed film in Super 35 format (which requires an additional enlarging process) to increase the overall grain, having been told by Spielberg to create "the ugliest, dirtiest movie" he'd ever shot.
c:9 ↩ Reply

Another thing that you can notice about the movie is that it has this blue filter on it. And it is not digital. It's not color corrected. It was done using chemicals on the film itself. They really got wild with making this movie as dirty as possible. Not only that, but the film also has sequences of visions of the precogs. And those are even dirtier than the rest of the film. Which is just wild. But the whole thing works so well. There is nothing to complain about. In some strange way, this dirtiness made the movie look awesome. c:10 c:11 ↩ Reply

There is a lot of very good tension in the movie. It is as if the movie never stops throwing at the audiences something interesting. And not just interesting, but also tension inducing. Which makes the movie a blast to watch, since at no point you feel like anything is over. You know in the movies, there is often an action scene and then it ends. And then you get some plot development in between. This movie has two completely original action scenes with a lot of humor and tension and interesting ideas in them happen one right after the other. You have this feeling that an action scene is done and you relax yourself. Just for the other one to start immediately after. Which ends in such a weirdly unexpected way, that you can't help yourself but smile. c:12 ↩ Reply

The movie has a very iconic car design that doesn't make much sense in the world of the film, unless you look at it from the perspective of this car being somewhat of a super-car. There are a lot of vertical roads in the movie and most cars have their middle sections rotate, so the people inside could still sit comfortably while the car goes up and down the roads. But there is a Lexus that the main character gets in the middle of the movie and it is just a normal car with 4 wheels. Maybe those are two different forms of transportation. Or maybe since it's a super-car, it is different. By the way, the car is actually real and is really made by Lexus as a concept car specifically for the movie. And it is called Lexus Minority. It also appears briefly in a movie by Michael Bay called The Island, which Spielberg produced. ↩ Reply

The movie has also a very interesting type of user interface on computers. The film starts with Tom Cruise looking over images produced by precogs to investigate where will the murder happen. The script of the film simply states that it is a computer display of some kind. In the movie you see something else. It's this curved glass surface which is operated entirely by gestures. Today in smartphones and tablets we have something similar. And a lot of people who developed the early touch gestures often said that they were inspired by the interface in Minority Report. Given that Spielberg's father Arnold was a computer scientist that has invented a lot of technology to make computers what they are today. It's interesting that touch swipes and other gesture controls in modern computers were inspired also by a Spielberg. Which makes me believe that Spielberg is more than capable of comprehending a topic of Free Software. So he could be a good director for a biopic on Richard Stallman. You know: darian.lanzetta@caa.com
  • this is the email of his agent. I guess we all should spam it with messages about Richard. But let's not have any prepared scripts. Or I fear the emails will end up in Spam. ↩ Reply
There is a lot of dark humor in the movie. In one scene Tom Cruise's character chases his own eyes as they are rolling down a corridor. Then there are a lot of funny criminal type characters. The two best are played by Jason Antoon and Peter Stormare. In both cases the humor comes from some derange characteristic of the character. Making for very funny, but also very dark jokes. There is an expositional scene with an elderly woman played by Lois Smith in which they talk about some truly terrible things some of which are political. But the scene is hilarious. And it has one of the most weird character moments in the entire Spielberg's filmography. I'm not gonna spoil it. But I'm pretty sure you will notice it. c:13 ↩ Reply

The movie is heavy on visual effects since it's a movie about future. But even though the movie is from 2002, the effects hold up very well. There is slight fakeness to some of it. Like the shots where you see the futuristic roads go in weird directions. But it's not like it doesn't look convincing. It's just today with path-tracing, rending something like this would give you a better result. There is also a scene with little robotic spiders crawling everywhere. And they look very convincing. And if you think about it, they look like miniature versions of robotic spidery things from another movie Spielberg did with Cruise. I wonder if one influenced the other in some way. c:14 ↩ Reply

Also this film has probably one of the best soundtracks from the legendary John Williams. Not the best. But one of the best. There are a lot of good compositions in this films that I like to listen to even just for fun. Some of which are very emotional. While others are very tension inducing. One, titled "Eye-Dentiscan" is just so hilarious. It's a proper showcase of musical humor. And combined with the scene it is just pure movie magic. It is beaten only perhaps by another composition by Williams that he did for Spielberg. And it is "Presenting Bianca Castefiore" from the Tintin movie. c:15 ↩ Reply

So to end this review I want to remind you of one email address. This one: darian.lanzetta@caa.com. And the name: Richard Stallman. And a genre: Biopic. Please do something with this information. ↩ Reply

Happy Hacking!!! ↩ Reply


[icon unlike] 1
[icon left]
[icon right]
[icon terminal]
[icon markdown]

Find this post on Mastodon

[avatar]  Troler c:0 March 17, 2026


I reviewed a lot of films on this website
⤴ View

Says BlenderDumbass 2 years ago, when he reviewed only a fraction of films he did in 2 years after that.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:1 March 17, 2026


almost every review I mention the name of Steven Spielberg
⤴ View

And in every review you mention Michael Bay

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:2 March 17, 2026


But it seem like every director can be viewed on a scale of Spielbergness
⤴ View

And literally every movie can be viewed on a scale of BAYHEM!!!!!!!!!

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:3 March 17, 2026


It's a story of potential future that is very bad and should not happen
⤴ View

I'd prefer to live in Minority Report world than this. I do think it's slightly better, at least the surveillance accounts for something tangible.

But I am here and I must do what I can to improve it.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:4 March 17, 2026


Spielberg was a very good friend of Stanley Kubrick before Kubrick died
⤴ View

So when a person dies, does that mean a friendship ends. If I die, does BlenderDumbass going to stop being my friend? That's sad :'(

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:5 March 17, 2026


In the world of Minority Report there are surgeons that can swap your eyes to new ones, which will fool the scanners.
⤴ View

You still need it in this world, since eye scanners do exist. They're called phones.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:6 March 17, 2026


You know: darian.lanzetta@caa.com is a good place to mail this idea to.
⤴ View

If you want a really good movie about 8 year old homocide, mail this guy: blenderdumbass@gmail.com
He's kind of a big deal director

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:7 March 17, 2026


Spielberg likes to not write anything himself
⤴ View

The Fabelmans does not exist to you?

Oh wait, you wrote write anything himself, not write anything 'bout himself

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:8 March 17, 2026


Oh my god!
⤴ View

Oh my G-d

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:9 March 17, 2026


shot with high-speed film in Super 35 format (which requires an additional enlarging process) to increase the overall grain, having been told by Spielberg to create "the ugliest, dirtiest movie" he'd ever shot.
⤴ View

Is this a Lars von Trier film or something? At least he didn't tell the actors to act and record them live.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:10 March 17, 2026


film also has sequences of visions of the precogs. And those are even dirtier than the rest of the film
⤴ View

Tony Scottish Spielberg

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:11 March 17, 2026


There is nothing to complain about
⤴ View

There is always something to complain about. Such as the sentence you wrote. I am complaining about it right now.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:12 March 17, 2026


This movie has two completely original action scenes with a lot of humor and tension and interesting ideas in them happen one right after the other
⤴ View

Basically Michael Bay

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:13 March 17, 2026


. I'm not gonna spoil it. But I'm pretty sure you will notice it.
⤴ View

Richard Stallman to the power of -1

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:14 March 17, 2026


The movie is heavy on visual effects since it's a movie about future
⤴ View

Tis possible to do a sci-fi movie without special effects.

[icon reply]
[avatar]  Troler c:15 March 17, 2026


Also this film has probably one of the best soundtracks from the legendary John Williams. Not the best. But one of the best
⤴ View

The best is the sound-track of Superman 1978

[icon reply]
[icon question]











[icon reviews]Footnote 2011 is a suprisingly good Israeli film

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 12 ❤ 1 💬 4



Footnote originally הערת שוליים is an Israeli film written and directed by Joseph Cedar. The film is about a very strange dramatic bureaucratic situation, where two professors, a father and a son, are in the same field, and one of them gets a honorary award for his achievements. But the bureaucrats made a mistake and told about the award to the wrong one of them.


#footnote #הערתשוליים #JosephCedar #LiorAshkenazi #Israel #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #jews


[icon reviews]Flight Risk 2025 is Mel Gibson failing to be Robert Rodriguez

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 5



The first shot of the 2025 thriller directed by Mel Gibson called Flight Risk is an establishing shot of a location you might see on television, which already says a lot about the movie. But that's not all of it. The shot is also very much computer-generated. I wouldn't say it's Ai ( but anything's possible ). It looks more like a 2D composition using various elements. A modern matte-painting of sorts. It's hard to point out specifically what's wrong with it, but it looks obviously fake. And obviously put together on a computer. And then the rest of the film doesn't really shake off this fakeness.


#flightrisk #melgibson #markwahlberg #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Is Hancock 2008 about the tragedy of rejection?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 7 ❤ 2 💬 1



Mary Embrey, the blonde woman played by Charlize Theron in the 2008 Peter Berg film Hancock, is surprisingly good looking. For the few people who read through the psycho-sexual analysis of me, you may know that for me in general, the name Mary, or the Latin version of it Maria, or the Russian version of it Masha, especially connected to a blonde, good looking woman, is very important. And yet, back when I saw Hancock for the first time. I didn't quite realize how important it is.


#hancock #peterberg #willsmith #charlizetheron #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Black Swan 2010 is Aronofsky trying to outcompete Charlie Kaufman

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 6



2002 Spike Jonze film Adaptation ( written by Charlie Kaufman ) is a story about a guy named Charlie Kaufman who is tasked with adapting an article about flowers into a Hollywood picture. And the best he can do is to make a meta-adaptation, where the movie you are watching is the story of writing the movie you are watching. 2010 Darren Aronofsky film Black Swan is a similar kind of meta-adaptation, this time of a Swan Lake ( Лебединое озеро ) by Tchaikovsky. While in the same time being a movie about adopting Swan Lake.


#blackswan #swanlake #natalieportman #darrenaronofsky #film #movies #review #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Blue Steel 1990 is the seed that grew into the reason Avatar didn't win best picture

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 11 ❤ 3 🔄 1 💬 2



So it's 1990 and Kathryn Bigelow writes and directs an action thriller about a police officer. The police officer is female and the movie almost refuses to sexualize her. Bigelow casts a nice half-Jewish girl Jamie Lee Curtis. And pretty much the whole movie, not a single shot of her emphasizes or admires her body ( apart from one sex scene where we see a very erotic closeup of her stomach ). Making that movie technically feminist. Few years later, in 1994, as James Cameron ( who was married to Bigelow between 1989 and 1991 ) is trying to find the actor to play the wife in his film True Lies. He is reminded of Blue Steel by Bigelow. And decides to cast Jamie Lee Curtis in his film. Giving us that very strange, almost pornographic scene where she does a very erotic strip-tease scene with Arnold Schwarzenegger. More than a decade later, in 2009, both Bigelow and Cameron make a movie. And both of those movies are nominated for the best picture. Yet Bigelow takes home the price. Did Cameron lose due to his pussy curse?


#bluesteel #KathrynBigelow #JamieLeeCurtis #film #review #movies #cinemastodon #michaelbay


[icon articles]We have to solve the money problem!

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 704 💬 7



On the Fireside Fedi interview with Jerry ( the admin of Infosec.Exchange Mastodon instance ) a scary truth was suddenly revealed ( on 34:11 ): Just to keep the instance up and running he needs to spend up to $5000 a month, pretty much out of his pocket. Donations to the instance barely cover any of that. And if he will ask people to pay to use it, they will, rightfully so, switch to a different instance.


#freedom #fediverse #freesoftware #finance #money #mastodon #webdev #programming #libreculture #libresoftware #opensource


[icon reviews]Why Hitchock's "Family Plot" 1976 is so kosher?

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 10 💬 1



Alfred Hitchcock is known to be a hell of a filmmaker at the time of the code. When everybody were required to be kosher, Hitch found every loophole in the rule book to get us exciting stuff. He was able to make sexy and violent psycho-sexual thrillers when sex and violence were not allowed. His final film, 1976 Family Plot was already shot during the MPAA rating system. Other filmmakers like Brian De Palma took the thrown the master of the macabre. So what does Hitch do? He does the safest, most PG movie of his career.


#FamilyPlot #AlfredHitchcock #movies #film #review #cinemastodon


[icon reviews]Predator 2 ( 1990 ) is a Predator, Alien and Lethal Weapon sequel all at once

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 16






#predator #alien #horror #action #film #review #movies #cinemastodon


[icon articles]The Nightmare Of Paying Online

[thumbnail]

[avatar]  Blender Dumbass

👁 102 💬 2



Cryptocurrency should have been the savior of the world from over-reaching control of governments and banks. But while on paper it could have worked. The reality is way worse. There was a store next to where I live that until a few years ago advertised that they can be paid with Bitcoin. The notice is now removed, probably due to the bursting of the crypto bubble, which lead to a rapid decrease of value of many cryptocurrencies.


[icon codeberg] Powered with BDServer [icon python] Plugins [icon theme] Themes [icon analytics] Analytics [icon email] Contact [icon mastodon] Mastodon
[icon unlock]